Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

BUGS with commands "Sweep 1, 2 rails", "Rail revolve" with closed curves.

Explain to me please, what is wrong with that?

Views: 4660

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

Hi,
Just for test Fl ipa curve A with a reference curve B.
Or maybe use loft compoment
Flip a curve A With référence curve B is à goog works

No. In this easy example no one rearrangement variants and flip curves and lines do not produce results.

I understand that the loft in this example will work fine. But if the curve will be a different number of points, the loft can already give the wrong result, and then I will need a Sweep 2 rails.

Rail revolve

Attachments:

In this case, I can not understand what the problem is just do...

Really, only at me these commands, provided the use of closed curves as a rail, do not give results?

Sweep 1 rail

Attachments:

Sweep 1 rail open rail

Attachments:

I once had the problem where I had to have the Curve Seam of the rail lined up with the profile curve.  Doing this fixed the issue.  Maybe that will work for you.  It isn't always reliable though.

Hi all,
Are you sure your curves are same direction ?

If yes Flip two curve of if no when attribute same direction at the curve...

Bye

Try it yourself, the files I attached.
Once again, I focus your attention on that issue in open and closed (Periodicity) rails lines.

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service