Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Capping (3 edge surfaces) out of a triangular network of lines

Hi everybody,

I made a short GH definition to get 3 edge surfaces out of a triangular network of lines.

My problem is that I don't know how to automatically iterate the process to get 100% of surfaces at the same time.

Any suggestions?

 

THANK YOU !!!

 

Matteo C.

 

 

by the way:

I know that sometimes my definition produces duplicate surfaces, but cleaning after baking into Rhino isn't a trouble.

Views: 1242

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

My approach would be to use the Delaunay Mesh Component to get the faces to work with.

see attached

Attachments:

Hi Danny,

your solution is smart and "elegant" but it doesn't work properly with complex geometries.

See my example.

Attachments:

Hi Matteo,

If a plugin solution is acceptable, StructDrawRhino has some curve network traversal routines.  Can create a mesh or planar faces as desired.

Installation instructions are at http://www.geometrygym.com/installing  I'm happy to advise further.

Attachments:

You could remove faces that don't meet your criteria with the cull pattern component.

Hi Danny,

I already know your plugin, but I'm struggling to find a solution that's 100% made with standard GH components.

Hi Matteo,

That's why I posted, I think you're going to find it really difficult to do with native grasshopper components.  The iterative traversal doesn't lend itself easily to a native solution from my experience.  Best of luck with finding a solution, I wish I could help more.

Hi Danny,

it seems that sometimes most of surfaces don't meet this criteria! Furthermore empty cells must be filled one by one in Rhino.

I see the problem now.

Try this method with your example.

Attachments:

Scratch that it doesn't work in 3D

Just as a matter of completeness. I've overcome the 3D issue with this next version. But it won't work for cases where the you have a sphere etc as it projects to a plane.

Attachments:

Hm...your previous release was better.

I've improved my definition...now with autobake (from LunchBox tools) it's a little bit easier to manage hundred of panels.

If I could only manage a "timer" for automatical number generation (from 0 to X)..... in a couple of minutes my 3D frame would be completely meshed...while I'm drinking coffee !!!

Attachments:

I've just noticed a little bug...now it works definitely better!

Attachments:

RSS

About

Translate

Search

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service