Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Hi Guys,

 

Is there a way to merge two triangular mesh faces within a pre-defined angle tolerance? I am trying to get rid of any extra triangles in my mesh.

 

How could I measure the angle between mesh faces? That could be a good start :)

 

Looking forward to your suggestions,

Many thanks,

 

Arthur

Views: 5765

Replies to This Discussion

This is something I am finding that there are severe bottle necks with GH when I convert the faces of a mesh to a surface using teh vertices of the face to define each surface. The reason I did this is that I wanted to offset and manipulate the facesof the mesh and it seemed that surfaces have a lot more geoemtrical methods available to one for workign with geometry.

 

Is there any reason for large bottlenecks when converting a mesh to individual surfaces? Is there a MeshToNurbs component that might improve performance? May be we need more mesh geometrical components?

Hi RubberDuck,

 

I guess this is mainly due to Rhino being a NURBS modelling tool initially? I agree with the "MeshToNurb" Component which would be so useful and also if possible a "MeshAngle" one which would give all the angles between mesh faces.

 

Actually the mesh split is also giving me a hard time by not always working but this is more related to Rhino than GH I would imagine...

 

Cheers,

 

Arthur

I had these issues with Rhino 5 32 bit. May be 64 bit Rhino 5 will be better?

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service