ror "nighttime"
how could that be - must be in the weather file i assume - is there anyway to fix this ?
suncalc.net gives me the following
00:00—02:17 — night
02:17—03:43 — astronomical twilight03:43—04:39 — nautical twilight04:39—05:19 — civil twilight05:19—05:23 — sunrise05:23—21:11 — daylight21:11—21:15 — sunset21:15—21:55 — civil twilight21:55—22:51 — nautical twilight22:51—00:17 — astronomical twilight00:17—00:00 — night
plz help - thank you !!!
…
lowest of all the points. Obviously if there is only one point.... easy, but its when I don't know how many points to expect that things get hard!
Best wishes to all for the holidays and for 2016!
Tom.…
) / 2*cos(theta). This equation can be simplified to (1-cos(theta))/2 and SVF is simply cos(theta). So why he complicated the thing? or I'm missing something here! any comments or ideas.
Many thanks in advance,
M. Najjar…
erature is measured i.e tempMeasureHeight on Dragonfly_Reference EPW Parameters component.
As for calculating the Reference height, where are you getting the "common sizing rule of 'twice the top building height'"? I can't find that rule anywhere... I think keeping the default value of 150m as the component advises would be better.
Something that helped me a lot, and I think will be of interest to you is this thesis:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/99251?show=full. Specifically, chapter 4 has a set of sensitivity analysis for UWG input parameters, which shows you the % impact of varying the various parameters in terms of heating/cooling energy, and temperature change. In general, it found that varying the meteorological parameters (like the boundary layer inputs) deviated simulated temperature less then 0.5 K, for less then 43 hours of the year from the original empirical measurement. Which is why the study concludes its safe to keep the meterological inputs to default values.
An important caveat here is that the Reference height, is a slight exception to this as it had an effect on Boston temperatures beyond that limit (pg 43). That being said, I spent some time trying to figure out how the 150m value was calculated, and as far as I can tell, its based on an atmospheric simulation model, referenced in Bueno's thesis. So unless you have access to your own vertical temperature dataset, I think keeping the meterological values as they are is a good rule of thumb.
S…
e aquí!
Course Description:This course is for design professionals who are looking to efficiently learn concepts and features of Grasshopper at an accelerated pace in an instructor-led online environment. The online course will meet for a total of four sessions. We will have a short orientation to cover the GoToTraining module. The Grasshopper training sessions will be split into three half-day sessions. Details...
Horario:Introducción – Febrero 22, 2016De: 9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. (EST) Clases – Febrero 23 al 25, 2016Curso: 9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. (EST)Break: 10:30 a.m. – 10:45 am (EST)Curso: 10:45 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. (EST)Q&A (Preguntas y tarea) de 1:00 p.m. – 1:35 pm (EST)Para Registrarse:correo electrónico: Jackie Nasserteléfono: 305 513 4445http://mcneelmiami.com/online___espanol/m/1/15/2016…
ated in all editions of Architektura Parametryczna Workshops!Architektura Parametryczna Workshops Optimization Warsaw 2016 FAQWHEN?21-22nd May 2016 (Saturday-Sunday)HOW LONG DO THE WORKHSOPS LAST?The workshops last in total 16 hours.Saturday 10AM -7PM (with lunch break), Sunday 10AM -7PM (with lunch break)WHAT WILL I LEARN?On Saturday the optimization processes with solar, views and structural analysis will be explored. We will be discovering optimal solutions with the help of plug-ins such as Galapagos, Silvereye, Octopus, Karamba and Ladybug. In the Sunday morning we will learn how to present the results of the optimization: creating catalogues of solutions and printing the optimization graphs. In the afternoon participants will have time for the development of the personal project. HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?The workshops cost 600 PLN (or 160€) for Early Bird payments and 700 PLN (or 190€) for the regular payments. The 3-person group - 1500 PLN (or 440€ )EARLY BIRD?For those who are certain that they will attend the workshops, we have a special Early Bird offer till 30th of April 2016.HOW CAN I SIGN UP?Send an email to info@architekturaparametryczna.pl with the title: “OPTI WAW 16”.HOW MANY PLACES ARE AVAILABLE?We have only 11 places!WORKSHOPS: Level: intermediate – advancePerquisites: the basic knowledge of Rhino and Grasshopper3D. Plug-ins: Silvereye, Octopus, Ladybug, Karamba. Weaverbird. Python GHThe main aim of the 16-hour workshops is to give the participants the understanding of how the optimization process can be used in practice and how it can help in solving everyday design problems. The practical exercise will be supported with the short lectures explaining the theoretical background of the optimization algorithms. The general program of the Optimization Warsaw 2016 Workshops*:1. Optimization of the facade geometry with solar analysis.2. Optimization of the roof structures with Karamba.3. Finding the optimal configuration of the space frame structures with Karamba.4. Discovering the best location or/and geometry of the building in accordance to the best views from the plot.5. Presentation of the discovered solutions. *Some of the exercises might be changed.…
diseño, construcción y entendimiento de nuestro entorno.
BIM está poniendo a disposición de los diseñadores y gestores auténticas bases de datos que pueden generarse, conectarse y editarse de forma paramétrica, proporcionando una sólida capa de realidad a los ejercicios de diseño generativo y computación que son objeto de estudio en Algomad, el seminario que busca popularizar la programación y la parametrización en el diseño y en la experiencia de nuestro entorno construido.
Tras un paréntesis en 2015, Algomad vuelve con el objetivo de demostrar cómo una visión computacional del BIM es una oportunidad para mejorar la forma de trabajar de ingenieros, arquitectos, constructoras y operadores de edificios e infraestructuras, tendiendo un puente entre las técnicas de diseño digital más avanzadas y la realidad de la construcción.
Algomad 2016 tendrá lugar en el centro de Madrid, en IE School of Architecture and Design, IE University, los días 3, 4 y 5 de Noviembre de 2016 y comprenderá 4 talleres así como ponencias a cargo de expertos de primer nivel.
Estructura de Algomad 2016
Algomad 2016 se estructura en torno a tres áreas temáticas principales:
BIM, como la metodología total específica para el sector de la construcción.
Computación, englobando las aplicaciones de programación y parametrización al diseño de edificios e infraestructuras.
Realidad, como marco de trabajo, buscando siempre resolver problemas reales a través de los dos puntos anteriores.
Público objetivo
Arquitectos, arquitectos técnicos, ingenieros y en general académicos, estudiantes de últimos cursos y profesionales del mundo inmobiliario y de la construcción que compartan un interés por la digitalización de nuestro sector. Se espera un nivel mínimo en el uso de herramientas BIM y de parametrización. Algomad proporcionará formación adicional y gratuita en las herramientas básicas a emplear en los talleres para asegurar un correcto desempeño.…
trators rights, or blocked port.As for your second problem:
"0. Runtime error (MissingMemberException): 'LightException' object has no attribute 'components'1. Traceback:line 43, in script"
It is caused by an old ghpython component. You need to have at least version 0.6.0.3. Download it from here.…
Added by djordje to Gismo at 10:30am on April 24, 2019
simple tricks become incomprehensible because of the disorder...)
I've just done [total lenght (unrolled) of the tape] / [the tape width] , this, to found the maximum possible size of the circles.
But then I "rounded" that number to make it uneven , to make circles "avoid" each-others.
like this > { [round.floor(x/2)] *2 } +1
Now that you make me think of it, it works also with more than 2 full-loops. I don't really understand WHY it works... probably it's something similar to a Venier Scale... (or more simply i'm going mad... )
That mess in the top of the definition is to make "smooth" the start-end of the tape, added some sections at 1/2 and 1/4 of the first-last sectors.... maybe also a 1/8 more could be cool...
Maybe i'm explaining myself bad, 1:43 here...
Goodnight!…