s. (Go to RCE Tabs)
Normaly a compoment is disable.
Fill the 3 parameters: name, e-mail and company.
Enable the component with the right mouse button on the component and enable.
A file is created here:
C:\RhinoDeveloppements\RhinoCivilEngineering\license\licence_a_envoyer.txt
Send it to this address:
rhinodeveloppements@gmail.com
You will receive your license within 24 hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pour procéder à la requête de licence, merci de suivre ces étapes.
1. Installer RhinoCivil Engineering
2.Charger Rhinoceros et Grasshoper
3.Glisser Déposer le composant RCE Protection sur le canevas de Grasshopper.(Sur le panneau RCE)
Normalement le composant est désactiver.
4. Remplir les 3 paramètres: Nom, Adresse mail et société.
Activer le composant avec un clic droit sur le composant et "enable"
Un fichier est alors créer ici:
C:\RhinoDeveloppements\RhinoCivilEngineering\license\licence_a_envoyer.txt
Envoyer le à cette adresse:
rhinodeveloppements@gmail.com
Vous recevrez votre licence dans les 24 heures.…
uce 2 curves that run across the surface =
and then with simple definition I rearrange my closest grid points to snap onto the new curves and let the rest of the points to adjust so that it has even distribution distance between points =
(notice that I don't want to have the UV to follow the curve direction. so I can get different numbers of point in-between those 2 curves). so far so good, but....
the problem comes when I try to rebuild the cell, each cell border will have this skewed look =
this problem can be solved by manually readjusting the numbers of UV grid and by sliding the grid along UV line, so I think it is time to use the galapagos, so I introduce 4 genomes pool to start with =
a) genome: numbers of Srf division in U direction (slider)
b) genome: numbers of Srf division in V direction (Slider)
c) genome: Graph Mapper to slide edges along U direction (custom GraphMapper)
d) genome: Graph Mapper to slide edges along V direction (custom GraphMapper)
I tried to then run the galapagos solver, I basically run 2 test.
the first one is by enabling all the genome except the number of UV Grid.Galapagos only allows edges to slides along the Surface, however the result is not as I expected, it is still a "skewed" grid =
and the 2nd test which enabling Galapagos to control the number of points in UV grid as well as letting the edges slide along the surface.the result is still not right =
maybe there is something wrong with the way I try to define the fitness value, just for comparison,this is the result I adjust it myself (manually dragging the sliders), it is not the best but at least the cell grid is more "tidy"=
If it is possible for you guys to give me a little insight, maybe you have a better logic to define the fitness value? I want to have 2 option for galapagos to solve =
1. rearrange the grid, however the grid should be almost square.
2. rearrange the grid, allows the grid to be either square or rectangle.
how to define this logic? because I think my current logic for fitness value does not work.
I was thinking of doing it with kangaroo but I want the grid to still follows the original surface. If I do mesh relaxation in kangaroo, the Grid would be detached from original surface and probably will have creases near the 2 curves.
thank you very much for reading this long post. I hope you can help me out :)…
and where the decimal place should be.
The reason it only shows the first 5 numbers that make up 1,000,000 is because anything smaller than 100 is considered insignificant when talking about 1 million. Think of it like this if 1 million represents an Olympic size swimming pool then 10 would represent the volume of a full tank of petrol for an average family car. You would have to stand there for an extremely long time to fill up the pool from a petrol pump.
It's important to know that these insignificant digits are still there for the purpose of calculations but are just not being displayed.
There are times when you may want to display these numbers in a format that makes more sense, for these occasions we can use the Format() function.
Format() Function
For versions BEFORE 0.9.0001 the VB Format Function is available through the Expression Components found on the Math Tab > Script Panel
Either by using the F input* or the Expressions Editor found on the Context Menu you can apply a format mask to the x input.
* except FxN
Anatomy of the formatting function above:
Format(..............................) <-- VB function
Format("........................."....) <-- Display String
Format("{0....................}"....) <-- Place Holder for first variable
Format("{0:0.000000000}"...) <-- Format Mask for 9 decimal places
Format("{0:0.000000000}", x) <-- Variable
This can be applied to points and their components:
For versions AFTER 0.9.0001 there is a dedicated Format Component or you can use the Expressions Components successor Evaluate.
For more information on the tags used in the Format Function see these links.
Standard formatting tags Custom formatting tags
WARNING:
If you format a number to be displayed in this way it becomes a string and will no longer have the complete Real number available for calculations. Always use the input to the format function for further requirements in calculations.…
you working on a PV system which will power a domestic hot water boiler?
To answer your questions:1) Each grasshopper component (ghpython being one of those too) is using grasshopper's data matching algorithm. This algorithm takes care of complex issues which may arise from combining lists with single items, data trees with different number of items per branch and so on.I think there is a way of introducing a call to other processor's threads per each inputted surface, but this will be a very difficult job, as it will require writing a custom data matching algorithm. I do not think I am up to that task.Instead I tried to introduce the multithread only to the final part of the PVsurface component and one of its time consuming parts: calculation of sun angles, solar radiation and ac/dc power output.I attached the test file below, but sadly it didn't go well: the multithreaded version mostly runs at the same time as the regular version.I do not think I am qualified enough to answer why is that so, but I think that it may have something to do with the type of the function that the multithreading is applied to: the code is suppose to run few separate functions a couple of thousand times, and work with a couple of lists. From my experience, the multithreading works the best when a single list or two are supplied to a single function. I may be wrong on this.I am very sorry to say that I can not implement this feature.2) I am not familiar if open source PV modules database has been released.But one can always download the data for specific modules from producers websites. It can then easily be transferred to a .csv file or other text file.Ladybug Photovoltaics are based on NREL's PVWatts model.In comparison with other commercial software applications, PVWatts offers a more generalized system model, with some of the values and characteristics being assumed or embedded.The Fuentes empirical thermal model we are currently using follows the same logic: it generalizes the Module characteristics. The following characteristics are only editable: module efficiency, temperature coefficient and module mount type.It may be possible to replace Fuentes with some other, less generalized 5 parameter thermal model. But as an architect, I would definitively need help on this.
Sorry if my reply did not fulfill your expectations, and thank you for the kind words!…
ndard length elements without any cutting, and using only simple connections, such as cable ties or scaffold swivel couplers.
To summarize the approach I present here:
Design an initial shape
Remesh this form so that the edges are all roughly the length of the tubes we will use to build the structure
Rotate and extend the edges of this mesh to create the crossings
Apply a relaxation to optimize the positions of the tubes for tangency
demo_reciprocal_structures.gh
Initial form
In this example I show how to apply this system to a simple sphere. You can replace this with any arbitrary shape. It can be open or closed, and have any topology.
Remeshing
The new ReMesher component takes an input mesh, and a target edge length, and iteratively flips/splits/collapses edges in order to achieve a triangulated mesh of roughly equal edge lengths.
Press the Reset button to initialize, then hold down the F5 key on your keyboard to run several iterations until it has stabilized. (F5 just recomputes the solution, and this can be a quick alternative to using a timer)
Once the remeshing is complete, bake the result into Rhino and reference it into the next part of the definition (I recommend doing this rather than connecting it directly, so that you don't accidentally alter the mesh and recompute everything downstream later).
Alternatively you can create your mesh manually, or using other techniques.
Rotate and Extend
We generate the crossings using an approach similar to that described by Tomohiro Tachi for tensegrity structures here:
http://www.tsg.ne.jp/TT/cg/FreeformTensegrityTachiAAG2012.pdf
Using the 'Reciprocal' component found in the Kangaroo mesh tab, each edge is rotated about an axis through its midpoint and normal to the surface, then extended slightly so that they cross over.
By changing the angle you can change whether the fans are triangular or hexagonal, and clockwise or counter-clockwise.
Choose values for the angle and scaling so that the lines extend beyond where they cross, but not so far that they clash with the other edges.
Note that each rod has 4 crossings with its surrounding rods.
There are multiple possibilities for the over/under pattern at each 'fan', and which one is used affects the curvature:
A nice effect of creating the pre-optimization geometry by rotating and extending mesh edges in this way is that the correct over/under pattern for each fan gets generated automatically.
Optimization for tangency
We now have an approximate reciprocal structure, where the lines are the centrelines of our rods, but the distances between them where they cross vary, so we would not actually be able to easily connect the rods in this configuration.
To attach the rods to form a structure, we want them to be tangent to one another. A pair of cylinders is tangent if the shortest line between their centrelines is equal to the sum of their radii:
Achieving tangency between all crossed rods in the structure is a tricky problem - if we move any one pair of rods to be tangent, we usually break the tangency between other pairs, and because there are many closed loops, we cannot simply start with one and solve them in order.
Therefore we use a dynamic relaxation approach, where forces are used to solve all the tangency constraints simultaneously, and over a number of iterations it converges to a solution where they are all met. The latest Kangaroo includes a line-line force, which can be used to pull and push pairs of lines so that they are a certain distance apart. Each rod is treated as a rigid body, so forces applied along its length will cause it to move and rotate.
The reciprocal component uses Plankton to find the indices of which lines in the list cross, which are then fed into the force for Kangaroo. We also use springs to keep each line the same length.
If the input is good, when we run the relaxation (by double clicking Kangaroo and pressing play), the rods should move only a little. We can see whether tangency has been achieved by looking at the shortest distance between the centerlines of the crossing rods. When this is twice the rod radius, they are tangent. Wait for it to solve to the desired degree of accuracy (there's no need to wait for 1000ths of a millimeter), and then press pause on the Kangaroo controller and bake the result.
The radius you choose for the pipes, curvature of the form and length of the edges all affect the result, and at this stage you may need to tweak these input values to get a final result you are happy with. If you find the rods are not reaching a stable solution but are sliding completely off each other, you might want to try adding weak AnchorSprings to the endpoints of the lines, to keep them from drifting too far from their original positions.
For previewing the geometry during relaxation I have used the handy Mesh Pipe component from Mateusz Zwierzycki, as it is much faster than using actual surface pipes.
To actually build this, you then need to extract the distances along each rod at which the crossings occur, and whether it crosses over or under, mark the rods accordingly, and assemble (If there is interest I will also clean up and post the definition for extracting this information). While this technique doesn't require much equipment, it does need good coordination and numbering!
There is also a ReciprocalStructure user object component that can be found in the Kangaroo utilities tab, which attempts to apply steps 3 and 4 automatically. However, by using the full definition you have more control and possibility to troubleshoot if any part isn't working.
The approach described here was first tested and refined at the 2013 Salerno Structural Geometry workshop, lead by Gennaro Senatore and myself, where we built a small pavilion using this technique with PVC tubes and cable ties. Big thanks to all the participants!
Finally - this is all very experimental work, and there are still many unanswered questions, and a lot of scope for further development of such structures. I think in particular - which of the relative degrees of freedom between pairs of rods are constrained by the connection (sliding along their length, bending, and twisting) and how this affects the structural behaviour would be interesting to examine further.
Steps 3 and 4 of the approach presented above would also work with quad meshes, which would have different stability characteristics.
There is also the issue of deformation of the rods - as the procedure described here solves only the geometric question of how to make perfectly rigid straight cylinders tangent. The approach could potentially be extended to adjust for, or make use of the flexibility of the rods.
I hope this is useful to somebody. Please let me know if you do have a go at building something using this.
Any further discussion on these topics is welcome!
Further reading on reciprocal structures:
http://vbn.aau.dk/files/65339229/Three_dimensional_Reciprocal_Structures_Morphology_Concepts_Generative_Rules.pdf
http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/cwfu/papers/recipframe/
http://albertopugnale.wordpress.com/2013/04/05/form-finding-of-reciprocal-structures-with-grasshopper-and-galapagos/
…
he field of digital design, fabrication, emerging technology and makers. the experts spend two weeks in bratislava, developing their research project and at the end of their residency we invite eager and interested people – fellows – to form a think-tank and take part in the pinnacle of the project.the event will be highly experimental and no specific result is guaranteed. the event will be accessible also to people who want to observe and learn, however the purpose of the gathering is not to teach, but rather to experiment, consult, make and network. the rese arch lab is not a tutorial workshop, it’s a platform for common development.
download a pdf
research project
the project questions the current condition of the large scale 3d printing capabilities. while small scale, desktop 3d printers emerge each day with better and better quality of the output, large scale printing is based mostly on low fidelity concrete printing, or in few cases not-so-high-quality metal printing.we will try to develop new solutions for large scale, rapid 3d printing by merging different technologies. those will constitute the main structure of the designed output, while the 3d printing will be seen only as the solidifying agent.we will utilize the kuka robot with an attached abs/pla extruder as the main production tool.
call for fellows
the fellows will join the last 4 days of the research, consult the current state, come up with new ideas and help verify and test the outputs. the fellows are being called for through a portfolio and cv selection process. the exceptional individuals who can both, benefit from and contribute to the project will be selected by mateusz zwierzycki and jan pernecky. no specific number of open positions are available and it is possible that no one will be chosen.
call for trainees
it will be possible to attend the rese arch lab to the people with no expertise or previous experience. they will take a role of observers or trainees. it has to be explicitly stated though, that the event is not meant to teach any specific software or skills and the experiments can fail in achieving an output.
application
to apply send an email at lab@rese-arch.org. the deadline for the submissions is monday, 6 april 2015 at noon 12pm.
costs
the participation fee is fixed 150€ for the fellows and 200€ for the trainees. this covers only the participation at the rese arch lab event. the traveling expenses and accommodation costs need to be covered by the participants themselves.
equipment
various equipment will be available – including 3d printers, 3d scanners, milling machines, laser cutters, vinyl cutters.most of all, rese arch and partners have to their full disposal a robotic arm kuka kr15/2.
the requirements
if you find yourself proficient in: parametric design (viewed as aesthetics), 3d printing, robotics, scripting, architectural geometry, cam technologies or woodworking then the event will be surely interesting for you. at the same time we seek for people with exceptional sense for aesthetics, as the final output will be designed together (not just by the project leader).on the hardware/software side, we need you to bring your own laptop. we will work mainly with rhino/grasshopper.…
pproach that will hopefully work. There's still the last part of putting it all together, but I figured I'd post my progress so you could play around with it if you wanted. This is kind of a lucky situation since its only single face breps and simple trims that are being worked with.
I've attached 3 definitions to this post. The first is my reorganization of your original definition, which creates the surfaces from the point grid and culls out any surfaces that are not "on" the surface so that we don't have to deal with them later down the line. This is done through a small VB component which determines whether any of the corner points lie on the surface. If it does it keeps the surface, if not, then it doesn't. The only issue with this is that in your example file, there are some surfaces which the corner points do not lie on the surface, yet the surface that they create spans the underlying surface. At this point I'm not worrying about those. You mentioned that you only want the surfaces that lie at the edge...this can be done by testing whether all 4 corner points lie on the trimmed surface or not.
The second definition is a coded version of the project function. In the example it will project to all the breps supplied, yet in the final version this probably won't be desired. Also, the direction (z axis) is hard code...this could be swapped out if desired.
The third definition is an shot at trimming a surface with an input curve (that curve happens to be projected). I tried this many ways, but found that the function RhinoCutUpSurface seamed to work alright. The other attempts at doing this directly with through functions available for OnBrep were unsuccessful and very complex. Luckily because the underlying brep is an single, untrimmed surface this function works well for us, but in situations where we have a trimmed or multiface brep we'd be up a creek with out a paddle. The function creates an array of breps, but in our case it will create essentially the same surface split by our curve and joined together as a single brep with two (possibly more) faces. All we have to do is find out which face we want to keep and duplicate that into a separate brep and pass it out of the component. In the example file I'm determining which on to keep based off of the distance from a test point to the centroid of each face.
The other option here, which would trump the need for projection or trimming, would be to extrude the edge curves through the surface in question, and use the BrepSplit function which requires two breps. There would still be the need to sort out what to keep, but if this approach were used, all the split pieces would be separate breps.
So, all the pieces are pretty much working separately, all that I have left to do is put them all together in the base definition. The only thing that is really the hump with that is determining exactly which face to keep. My idea at the moment is to find out which corner of the surface does not like on the base surface and use that to determine which face will be thrown out. This might be one of the easier ways, but will not be rock solid. The other option is to pull a test point that's on one of the faces to the base surface and the other face, then use the distance from test point to the point on the base surface and the distance to the pulled point on the other face to the base surface to figure out which one to keep.
As to sectioning off parts of the solution, you could do this in a number of ways, but here's two simple ones. In a scripting component just add a boolean value to the inputs and put the whole script inside of an if statement that looks at that boolean value. With components just add a boolean gate or a null pattern componet anywhere you want in the stream. Again, hook in a boolean toggle value, and that will stop the info from going to components that are downstream.…
.
as you can see I devided it into 3 parts.
part1: when I try to connect the new shape to the rest of your definition,the plan z,which gives the panels individually when baked(so I can work them individually)doesn't work,apparently there is something missing when I want to explode it.
that is why I connected it to the definition that I already had(part2)( the only cool part about that one is the attractor point)well it kind works,but not really(if you zoom in you can see that there are some parts overlapped and really not looking good).however I much rather your definition because of the option it gives me to work with individual panels when baked(planz).
however it's around 4 am. and I have decided to make some major changes in design (to prepare some closed and open space,I'm talking about part3 that works with the fibonacci like shape,I know it doesnt look really good,but seriously 4am.!).the major problem is that I tried to make a form like that with kangaroo so the shape would be smoother but I wasnt really able to make it with kangaroo,that's why I made it manually in rhino.I was wondering if you can help me make something like this ( not exacly like this) with kangaroo or (if impossible to be made with kangaroo)even helping me optimizing it so it doesnt look as bad,as you can see when I try to work the grasshopper definition on this shape,it gives me different panel sizes for each surface and all of them are to small compared with the overall size of the so-called pavillion(give it 200-500 sq feet (20-50 sq.m).and any suggestions about the shape would be appreciated,please forgive my basic knowledge of rhino and grasshopper,and let's say I wanted to make a shape like these(don't laugh please!)
u promised not to laugh!!!
please help me find the right way!
…
ed to do:
FOA_Bundle_Tower.pdf
The tower height is a variable
The degrees of symmetry in plan is variable from 2 to 10 (2 bundles up to 10 bundles; the actual project has 4 bundles made from 8 individual towers or tubes).
The overall radius or diameter of the circle on which each tower is located is a variable
The tower should match the overall topology of the Bundle Tower: each tube should alternate between touching its neighboring tube on the left and right twice.
The number of floors is a variable
Overall tower height: 500m- Floor to floor height: 4.5m (I recommend that you increase this to 10m while testing)- Each tube's plan roughly has an area of 1000m2
this is what i have got so far:
foa tower.ghx
I just need guidance because i am soo lost. thank you
…