Search Results - 广东11选5体育彩票开奖结累查询-『8TBH·COM』下载青蛙彩票网--2023年3月19日6时33分12秒.H5c2a3.rynzzgon4-cc

Topic: parametric architecture competition script needed (the swarm and the hive mind): n due at the end of march. i am hoping to see if i can do this as a sort of "HIVE MIND" experiment with one or two or more posters to the forum. i have uploaded two files to http://www.formpig.com/nine_bar-FAR and I have the following goals: 1. To "kinematically iterate" various formal building envelopes based upon a 50' x 100' lot that "conform" to the nine bar linkage geometry. 2. This lot would have "setbacks" consisting of two 5' side setbacks, a 10' rear yard setback and a 25' front yard setback. max height on the structure is 32' and the allowable overhangs into the setbacks are 2'. I would like to find a way to use the "nine bar geometry" to construct a series of iterations for "floors", "walls" and "ceilings", which would then be tied to a volumetric (cubic volume), or a total square footage (perhaps based upon two horizontal section cuts) which was based upon a given number that I will provide per local building code. 3. Laid on top of this we would also have "mcmansion ordinance" requirements based upon the pdf enclosed. i expect to have this "tent restriction" data in digital form to upload to ftp shortly. It would be up to you individually or collectively to determine how best to position this "in the real world" based upon the lot, setbacks, zoning requirements etc. For instance, perhaps the nine bar configuration has its vertices coplanar with the 50' x 100' x 32' envelope restrictions and then the chosen volume is "trimmed' by the setback requirements. Or perhaps the nine-bar configuration is generated completely within the setbacks, or perhaps it is generated 2' outside of the setbacks so as to take advantage of the 2' overhang allowance on the setbacks, etc. * Given an opportunity to develop the work in a second phase we would have an opportunity to tie this into various efficiencies such as Bill of Materials (wall floor and ceiling square foot calculations), envelope to volume calculations, solar panel efficiencies (solar orientation and envelope geometry) etc, etc (love to get suggestions for this). * I've become /really/ convinced that this would be a /really/ interesting entry based upon my just finishing up Kas Oosterhuis' Towards a New Kind of Building: A Designer's Guide for Non-Standard Architecture". In an ideal world I was hoping that it would be possible to hash this out discussion-wise and then literally passing it around on the list after someone eventually made the first move by tossing out a rough ghx script. My expectation would be to finalize it rapidly in the next two weeks. Something of a contemporary version of a design charette. However, I realize this may not be workable so if you have experience in this arena and particularly if you think this is a brief that is straighforward enough to be almost literally implemented in Grasshopper, please contact me for any wage and/or contract fee requirements. I'm getting a bit of a late jump on this but my hope is that with the right participant(s) that I can thrash it together quick enough for the first round. info@formpig.com…; Added by Jonathan Chertok at 2:18pm on March 5, 2012

Topic: Kangaroo matters (relaxing "shapes" to nurbs): case for sure (started by Giorgio a couple of days before). Ive got involved because I exploit ways to "relax" shapes on nurbs (say patterns created by Lunchbox or "manually) without using any kind of mesh (more explanations soon). Here's 5 test cases (SDK appears that doesn't have some "thicken surface" thing ... thus the algo that finds the "whole" shapes is rather naive) VS 2 Kangaroo "methods" and the why bother (he he) option as well. If the goal is to "fit" these shapes within the nurbs ... does it work so far? No I'm afraid (appears that "springs" used are not the proper ones - or [Kangaroo1 option] the lines that pull should been originated from valance 2 points only) Tricky points: 1. Internalize appears having a variety of serious issues (see Input inside definition) - Load Rhino file first (but even so ...). 2. Pull to surface is deactivated - this is not the issue here (and it's very slow). 3. Since Starling/WB alter the "curves - points" related order the issue here (Pull points to curves) is to correspond apples to apples: and that's what Anemone does: From chaos : to order: this means that prior activating Kangaroo you should double click to the Anemone start component in order to "sort" properly the curves. But .. fact is that results are pathetic: more soon best, Peter…; Added by peter fotiadis at 12:03pm on July 31, 2014

Topic: What to Do If Your AC Blows Air but Doesn’t Cool the Room?: t the cooling just wasn’t happening. At first, I assumed the unit was broken beyond repair. But after checking the manual, I found out that this is one of the most common AC issues, and in many cases, it can be fixed with simple troubleshooting. Common Reasons Why an AC Doesn’t Cool Dirty air filter – Blocks airflow and reduces cooling efficiency. Low refrigerant level – If there’s a leak, the system won’t cool properly. Blocked condenser coils – Dust and debris prevent heat exchange. Wrong thermostat settings – The AC may be set to “fan only” mode. Poor insulation – Cold air escapes while hot air enters. Step-by-Step Troubleshooting 1. Check the Thermostat Settings The manual recommends verifying that the unit is set to “cool” mode and the temperature is lower than the room’s current temperature. Once, I had it set to “fan,” which explained why it wasn’t cooling. 2. Clean or Replace the Air Filter According to the manual, a clogged filter is the most frequent cause of weak cooling. I replaced mine, and airflow improved instantly. 3. Inspect and Clean Condenser Coils The manual explains that outdoor condenser coils should be free of dirt. I carefully cleaned mine with a soft brush, and the cooling power came back. 4. Check for Refrigerant Leaks The manual notes that low refrigerant levels require a professional. I noticed frost on the lines, which was a sign of a leak. After repair and refill, the AC worked perfectly again. 5. Improve Room Insulation Sometimes the AC isn’t the problem. The manual advises closing windows, doors, and blinds to keep cool air inside. Doing this made a noticeable difference. My Experience At first, I thought I needed a brand-new AC. But by following the manual — cleaning filters, checking settings, and maintaining the condenser — I solved the problem without expensive repairs. Since then, I clean the filters monthly and keep an eye on coil cleanliness. FAQ Why does my AC blow air but not cool? – Most often because of clogged filters, dirty coils, or low refrigerant. Can I fix this at home? – Yes, by following the manual: check thermostat settings, clean filters, and ensure proper airflow. When should I call a technician? – If the refrigerant is low or the AC still doesn’t cool after basic fixes.…; Added by Karl Mozaik to GeometryBin at 4:12am on September 27, 2025

Comment on: Topic 'Butterfly Error - Cannot satisfy memory request': d not work. The block mesh would stop halfway and my snappyhexmesh would not work as well. Block Mesh stopping halfway: SET DOCKER_TLS_VERIFY=1&SET DOCKER_HOST=tcp://192.168.99.100:2376&SET DOCKER_CERT_PATH=C:\Users\akiwya\.docker\machine\machines\default&SET DOCKER_MACHINE_NAME=default&docker exec -i 4c9bb2f7444b pgrep snappyHexMeshdocker-machine envSET DOCKER_TLS_VERIFY=1&SET DOCKER_HOST=tcp://192.168.99.100:2376&SET DOCKER_CERT_PATH=C:\Users\akiwya\.docker\machine\machines\default&SET DOCKER_MACHINE_NAME=default&docker exec -i 4c9bb2f7444b pgrep snappyHexMeshdocker-machine envButterfly is running blockMesh. PID: None/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\| ========= | || \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox || \\ / O peration | Version: v1612+ || \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com || \\/ M anipulation | |\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/Build : v1612+Exec : blockMeshDate : May 23 2017Time : 06:45:55Host : "default"PID : 1412Case : /home/ofuser/workingDir/butterfly/outdoor_airflownProcs : 1sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE).fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 10)allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //Create time Creating block mesh from "/home/ofuser/workingDir/butterfly/outdoor_airflow/system/blockMeshDict"Creating block edgesNo non-planar block faces definedCreating topology blocksCreating topology patches Creating block mesh topology Check topology Basic statistics Number of internal faces : 0 Number of boundary faces : 6 Number of defined boundary faces : 6 Number of undefined boundary faces : 0 Checking patch -> block consistency Creating block offsetsCreating merge list . Creating polyMesh from blockMeshCreating patchesCreating cellsCreating points with scale 1 Block 0 cell size : i : 4.992714 .. 4.992714 j : 4.989322 .. 29.93593 k : 2.137405 .. 5 Snappyhexmesh error: SnappyHexMeshDict.snap is changed from "true" to "false".saving the new snappyHexMeshDict.SET DOCKER_TLS_VERIFY=1&SET DOCKER_HOST=tcp://192.168.99.100:2376&SET DOCKER_CERT_PATH=C:\Users\akiwya\.docker\machine\machines\default&SET DOCKER_MACHINE_NAME=default&docker exec -i 4c9bb2f7444b pgrep snappyHexMeshdocker-machine envSET DOCKER_TLS_VERIFY=1&SET DOCKER_HOST=tcp://192.168.99.100:2376&SET DOCKER_CERT_PATH=C:\Users\akiwya\.docker\machine\machines\default&SET DOCKER_MACHINE_NAME=default&docker exec -i 4c9bb2f7444b pgrep snappyHexMeshdocker-machine envSET DOCKER_TLS_VERIFY=1&SET DOCKER_HOST=tcp://192.168.99.100:2376&SET DOCKER_CERT_PATH=C:\Users\akiwya\.docker\machine\machines\default&SET DOCKER_MACHINE_NAME=default&docker exec -i 4c9bb2f7444b pgrep snappyHexMeshdocker-machine envSET DOCKER_TLS_VERIFY=1&SET DOCKER_HOST=tcp://192.168.99.100:2376&SET DOCKER_CERT_PATH=C:\Users\akiwya\.docker\machine\machines\default&SET DOCKER_MACHINE_NAME=default&docker exec -i 4c9bb2f7444b pgrep snappyHexMeshdocker-machine envButterfly is running snappyHexMesh. PID: None/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\| ========= | || \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox || \\ / O peration | Version: v1612+ || \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com || \\/ M anipulation | |\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/Build : v1612+Exec : snappyHexMeshDate : May 23 2017Time : 06:47:44Host : "default"PID : 1643Case : /home/ofuser/workingDir/butterfly/outdoor_airflownProcs : 1sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE).fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 10)allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //Create time Create mesh for time = 0--> FOAM FATAL ERROR: Cannot find file "points" in directory "polyMesh" in times 0 down to constant From function Foam::word Foam::Time::findInstance(const Foam::fileName&, const Foam::word&, Foam::IOobject::readOption, const Foam::word&) const in file db/Time/findInstance.C at line 202. FOAM exitingRuntime error (PythonException): --> snappyHexMesh Failed!--> FOAM FATAL ERROR: Cannot find file "points" in directory "polyMesh" in times 0 down to constant From function Foam::word Foam::Time::findInstance(const Foam::fileName&, const Foam::word&, Foam::IOobject::readOption, const Foam::word&) const in file db/Time/findInstance.C at line 202. FOAM exitingTraceback: line 110, in script Heres an updated file…; Added by Annie Wu to Ladybug Tools at 12:52am on May 23, 2017

Topic: Ladybug Solar Water Heating components released !: option, after downloading check if .ghuser files are blocked (right click -> "Properties" and select "Unblock"). Then paste them in File->Special Folders->User Object Folder. You can download the example files from here. They act in similar way, Ladybug Photovoltaics components do: we pick a surface, and get an answer to a question: "How much thermal energy, for a certain number of persons can my roof, building facade... generate if I would populate them with Solar Water Heating collectors"? This information can then be used to cover domestic hot water, space heating or space cooling loads: Components enable setting specific details of the system, or using simplified ones. They cover analysis of domestic hot water load, final performance of the SWH system, its embodied energy, energy value, consumption, emissions... And finding optimal system and storage size. By Dr. Chengchu Yan and Djordje Spasic, with invaluable support of Dr. Willian Beckman, Dr. Jason M. Keith, Jeff Maguire, Nicolas DiOrio, Niraj Palsule, Sargon George Ishaya and Craig Christensen. Hope you will enjoy using the components! References: 1) Calculation of delivered energy: Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, John Wiley and Sons, J. Duffie, W. Beckman, 4th ed., 2013. Technical Manual for the SAM Solar Water Heating Model, NREL, N. DiOrio, C. Christensen, J. Burch, A. Dobos, 2014. A simplified method for optimal design of solar water heating systems based on life-cycle energy analysis, Renewable Energy journal, Yan, Wang, Ma, Shi, Vol 74, Feb 2015 2) Domestic hot water load: Modeling patterns of hot water use in households, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Lutz, Liu, McMahon, Dunham, Shown, McGrue; Nov 1996. ASHRAE 2003 Applications Handbook (SI), Chapter 49, Service water heating 3) Mains water temperature Residential alternative calculation method reference manual, California energy commission, June 2013. Development of an Energy Savings Benchmark for All Residential End-Uses, NREL, August 2004. Solar water heating project analysis chapter, Minister of Natural Resources Canada, 2004. 4) Pipe diameters and pump power: Planning & Installing Solar Thermal Systems, Earthscan, 2nd edition 5) Sun postion and POA irradiance, the same as for Ladybug Photovoltaics (Michalsky (1988), diffuse irradiance by Perez (1990), ground reflected irradiance by Liu, Jordan (1963)) 6) Optimal system and storage tank size: A simplified method for optimal design of solar water heating systems based on life-cycle energy analysis, Renewable Energy journal, Yan, Wang, Ma, Shi, Vol 74, Feb 2015.…; Added by djordje to Ladybug Tools at 8:05am on December 8, 2015

Comment on: Topic '3d printing a GH gyroid': h tubes are redundant so surfaces overlap instead of interpenetrate, so it is not a good system. Cocoon is the best answer these days unless you can get Exowire/Exoskelton to work. If you want more control over shape, feed your uncapped tubes into Cocoon as meta-surfaces and delete any and all of the inner meshes to just keep the outer single closed one, but this is just duplicate-culled lines used as meta-lines: Turn down the CS input to 0.005 for this result, from 0.02 used for faster preview. In fact bake the lines and only test Cocoon on a few of them in order to get the result you want before doing the whole thing. Whole thing at 0.005 cell size takes 5 minutes for Cocoon and 2 minutes for refinement to a smooth and even mesh. Actually, seems like 0.005 is way too fine, giving a 600MB STL file. So, 0.01 cell size at less than a minute total: 159MB STL which is still a bit too big for places like Shapeways. Wow. OK then 0.02 cell size, but I have to increase diameter or my two smoothing steps in refine collapse things too much, an in fact I set it to no smoothing, getting more volume and a reasonable 46MB STL file: Alas, now it's more frail and overly organic rather than mechanical. Increasing diameter just merges it into perforated plates too much. File size is simply an issue with this complexity level, so different 3D printing services will have different file size limits. Exowire/Exoskeleton would work but your original mesh hasn't been MeshMachine remeshed to be regular, so short segments ruin it. Here is just a corner: I think that's why more wires fails, at least. Pretty temperamental component. Switching to MeshMachine is needed, I guess, instead of Cocoon refine, to remesh away so many small triangles along the boring tubes. Crucial for good remeshing was to set Flip to 0 or I failed to get a rough enough mesh. It's an adaptive mesh so I can retain good detail while roughing out the tubes. MeshMachine is terribly slow for this whole thing, like 6 minutes, and blows up for this overly rough setting, 20 steps, so less rough, ugh, I'm out of time. I think free Autocad Meshmixer is the way to make a better smaller mesh, after a refined output from Cocoon. MeshMachine is just too slow to tweak and when it blows up, creating massive triangles jutting out, it hangs too when you change settings. Starting with a Cocoon refined mesh certainly helped Meshmixer. Using triangle budget lets me have full control. Here is 150K triangles instead of 200K: STL file size down to 40MB. I think Shapeways is 70 or 100MB limit? So it can be even finer. Here is the Cocoon output versus the Meshmixer reduction: To use Meshmixer, turn on View > Show Wireframe, Command-S to select all and use Edit > Reduce from the palette that appears. Cocoon can end up making a few inner meshes where things get weird in your uneven original mesh with small holes so fish out the main mesh by adding a List Item node. The best strategy for Cocoon is indeed to make an overly fine STL so you avoid any need to tweak forever in Grasshopper, but then you can achieve a smaller mesh file size while preserving shape instead of things turning all smearly organic in Grasshopper.…; Added by Nik Willmore at 4:08pm on March 14, 2016

Topic: New tutorial - Developable strips - Part 1: l coarse mesh Subdividing this mesh into strips of thin quads Relaxing/Planarizing this mesh Splitting and Unrolling In this post I deal with the first 2 of these stages. You can download the example definition here: developable_strips_tutorial.gh Drawing the initial mesh To begin with we need a simple quad mesh. This can be modelled manually in Rhino, and only needs to use enough quads to give the topology and very rough form. No need to worry too much about the exact geometry or dimensions at this point, as we will refine and alter it as we go. One very important thing that we do need to bear in mind though is that all internal vertices must have even valence (I covered this a bit in the earlier post here). So for example, this is bad: (because the highlighted vertex is surrounded by 5 faces) While this is good (and can still be relaxed to the same shape): (the top and bottom vertices have valence 8, and the vertices between the arms have valence 4) With a little practice it should be possible to convert any mesh into one that meets this condition. The reasons why we need this condition should become more clear in the later steps. First subdivision This is where we choose how many strips we want our final model to have, by applying a few rounds of subdivision using the Refine component (you could also use Weaverbird here): Sorting the face directions While quad meshes do not carry the same information about u/v directions as a NURBS surface, the individual faces do have a sort of direction given by their vertex ordering. However, these face directions are usually not consistently arranged, especially after subdivision. The Kangaroo MeshDirection component attempts* to orient all the faces in a mesh so that they match with their neighbours. For example, before sorting, if we draw a line from the midpoint of the first edge of each face to the midpt of its opposite edge, we might get something like this: Whereas after sorting, we should get something like this: *note that I say it attempts to orient the faces consistently. In some cases no valid solution exists, for instance if 3 or 5 faces meet around a vertex, hence the requirement mentioned at the start for even valence vertices. Directional Subdivision Now that we have consistent face directions across the mesh, we can apply further subdivision, but this time in one direction only. So we go from roughly square quads to thin rectangles. The idea is that as we apply higher levels of this directional subdivision, the final relaxed result goes towards something semi-discrete. A NURBS surface is fully continuous, and a mesh is fully discrete (made up of separate facets), while this strip model will be smooth in one direction and faceted in the other. Go to part 2 for the next step of the process …; Added by Daniel Piker to Kangaroo at 7:34am on January 14, 2014

Topic: Questions about Pachyderm options: y from the Rhino model and having the absorption coefficients of the materials that are entered into Pachyderm, why is it not possible to generate a reverberation time diagram, without the need to start any analysis? MAPPING METHOD: When for example the mapping of the Strenght Index (G) is generated through the "create map" option, succesively I can´t generate any other energy criterion map, but I have to redo the simulation. Is it a limitation of the software or am I wrong something? MAPPING METHOD: I kindly wanted to ask what is the difference between minimum and detailed convergence and why the number of reflections order it takes into account for the simulation is not specified. The mapping method take care only of the Raytracing Method or the Image Source too? MAPPING METHOD: Why is the mapping value that can be exported to Rhino not generated for all the calculation raster points, but maximal only for 100 values? MAPPING METHOD: This method hasn't been implemented in Grasshopper yet, has it? RAYTRACING METHOD (Pach:RT): I did a raytracing through the components of GH, using only the Pach_RT, and I had these curious results in terms of time: RaysCount: 15.000, IS_Order:1 = 5min RaysCount: 15.000, IS_Order:2 = 12min RaysCount: 15.000, IS_Order:3 = 3min RaysCount: 15.000, IS_Order:4 = 8min RaysCount: 15.000, IS_Order:5 = 3min Why a raytracing with only 2 order, is more and more extensive than the 3/4 and 5 order? ANALYSIS RESULT: Would there be a way to export all the results of a simulation, as is done via Odeon, to a .txt list? I apologize in advance for asking so many questions, I hope you can find the time to answer, Yours sincerely from Müller-BBM…; Added by G.C.Ruvio to Pachyderm Acoustic at 9:11am on September 2, 2021

Event: COLLABORATIONS | The Art and Science of Building Facades: RESENTERS PETER ARBOUR seele KEITH BOSWELL Skidmore Owings & Merrill MARK E. DANNETTEL Thornton Thomasetti LISA IWAMOTO IwamotoScott JASON KELLY JOHNSONFuture Cities Lab/California College of the Arts HAO KO Gensler BILL KREYSLER Kreysler & Associates ANDREW KUDLESS Matsys/California College of the Arts CHRIS LASCH Aranda\Lasch ARNOLD LEE HOK MIC PATTERSON Enclos, Corp. M. MIN RA Front GEOFF ROSSI Element DENNIS SHELDEN Gehry Technologies ANN SMITH Cambridge Architectural MARCELLO SPINAP-A-T-T-E-R-N-S SANJEEV TANKHA Buro Happold BEN TRANEL Gensler PHIL WILLIAMS Webcor Builders & Consulting Group DIGITAL FABRICATION WORKSHOPS 8 LU/HSW or 8 LU credits (depending upon workshop choice) Friday, July 27th 2012 9:00 AM – 6:00 PMCalifornia College of the Arts San Francisco, California PARAMETRIC ENVELOPES WITH GRASSHOPPERANDREW KUDLESS Matsys Design/California College of the Arts COMPOSITE FACADES IN ARCHITECTUREBILL KREYSLER & JOSHUA ZABEL Kreysler & Associates RESPONSIVE BUILDING FACADESJASON KELLY JOHNSON Future Cities Lab/California College of the Arts SCRIPTED FACADESCHRIS LASCH Aranda/Lasch PARAMETRIC FACADE TECTONICSKEVIN MCCLELLAN & ANDREW VRANA Digital Fabrication Alliance BIM MODELING WITH REVIT/INTRO TO VASARIGERMAN APARICIO California College of the Arts & Autodesk Fellow Facade technologies are developing at a more dynamic rate than almost any other issue related to construction today with an impact on performance, sustainability, materials, fabrication, design, delivery and much more. What was once thought impossible is now an everyday reality, and the future promises accelerating change. Presented by Enclos and The Architect’s Newspaper, COLLABORATION will bring together in a two-day event, the industry, the profession, and the academy to explore the evolution and the issues surrounding today’s high tech building envelope through case studies and lectures presented by foremost practitioners, as well as panel discussions, and workshops conducted by leaders in the AEC profession. Aimed at architects, building owners and developers, general contractors, engineers, fabricators, material suppliers, educators, and students, the event’s panels and sessions address the transformative opportunities created by new technologies and resources. From using BIM for communicating effectively with fabricators, to energy modeling, to retrofitting practices and the latest design tools, the COLLABORATION conference offers an unprecedented opportunity to survey the possibilities of designing in the digital age. Who Should Attend Architects, designers, engineers, building owners, developers, and facade consultants interested in gaining increased understanding of cutting-edge building envelope technologies.…; Added by German at 12:53pm on July 5, 2012

Topic: Is it possible to model multi-modifer complex radiance materials in Honeybee ?: _b2 texfunc WoodGrain_tex 6 xgrain_dx ygrain_dx zgrain_dx woodtex.cal -s 0.01 0 1 0.075 WoodGrain_tex plastic WoodGrain_NonColor2 0 0 5 0.364 0.187 0.072 0.006 0.0 This creates the texture (on the table) below: Is it possible for me to use a multi-modifier material like this in Honeybee ? Thanks, Sarith (Update: I figured out a hack to do this in MSH2RAD but I still don't know if it is possible to add this to the Honeybee Library).…; Added by Sarith Subramaniam to Ladybug Tools at 1:42pm on January 6, 2016