esult:
as you see it is not trimmed
i know that i should control the "automatic trim bolean" in "CreatePatch"
but the problem is the "CreatePath" in GH has 3 different way to work
i used the simple one: "CreatePatch(geometry, uSpans, vSpans, tolerance)"
but if i want to trim the surface i should use a more complex way: "CreatePatch(geometry, startingSurface, uSpans, vSpans, tolerance, trim, tangency, pointSpacing, felexibility, surfacePull, fixEdge, tolerance)"
i don't know what to insert instead of the "red" parameters…
ll learn the essential skills of manipulating geometry using various computational methods. The workshop will specifically demonstrate how to control the performance related data flow from Autodesk Ecotect, Vasari and Maya into the parametric modeling environment of Grassshopper; how to generate complex 2D/3D patterns based on the abstract relationship among points, lines and surfaces; how to integrate Rhino’s surface modeling with Maya’s mesh modeling; how to use performance data baked from other program as the driver to manipulate adaptive geometries across the building skin.
Lecture Topics
Parametric design concepts
Computation for Performance Driven Design
Morphing geometry and biomimicry
Surfaces and meshes
Demonstrations
Image based tessellation
Pattern making
Paneling with adaptive objects
Box morphing and variations
Vertex color based object morphing, integrating Maya with Grasshopper
Geometry manipulation based on the solar data from Ecotect and Vasari
Dates - July 10, 2012 : Workshop Announced + Registration Opens. - August 15, 2012 : Registration Closes. - August 18 &19, 2012: Workshop.
Check more detail online
…
ne diverse digital design methodologies and the use of different tools such as Autodesk Maya, Rhinoceros and Grasshopper.
Building up technical skills will provide the attendees with a solid platform from which to start rethinking and exploring innovative architectural ideas in collaboration with the team and the tutors.
URBAN FIELDS
Phase I
In the first part of the workshop attendees will be looking at field conditions and how to generate and design such fields that can help structure a possible urban condition in Florence.
We will be exploring dynamic systems, geometric systems and network theories to generate and design an abstract field condi- tion that extends the urban experience of the city onto the vertical dimensions of towers. Simple operations that would span variations from an initial state will give rise to high level of com- plexity.
The goal of this exercise is to create a rich and diversified intel- ligible urban space that can be later on subjected to local inter- ventions and zooming in to locally enhance each design.
AGENT - BODIES POLYMORPHISM
Phase II
The second part of the workshop will build upon first phase; par- ticipants will select one archetype (high rise tower) as a study model for further development.
Besides engaging with multi agent algorithms design strategies, attendees will address strategic utilisation of structurally and environmentally generated morphologies to design coherent and highly differentiated tower exo-skeletons.
Tutors will introduce agent-bodies polymorphism in order to explore the generation of structural aware and capable geom- etries through agent based formation of non-linear hierarchies and emergent patterns. These agent-bodies will operate in a complex spatial manner to form structure, partitions or enclo- sure and will operate across scales, creating a poly-scalar level of detail.
Attendees will speculate how autonomous systems can cre- ate new structures and intelligent distribution of structural elements, about new collaborative strategies of construction and the performativity they will evoke (performance, effects, responsiveness, interaction).
Fees
Early registration (before 1st June)
Students 390€ - Professionals 440€
Late registration (after 1st June)
Students 490€ - Professionals 540€
More info and Applications
https://www.ax-om.com/edu/polymorphism/
…
en la práctica de nuevos métodos de diseño y fabricación utilizando herramientas digitales. Estos procedimientos emergentes están cambiando radicalmente la manera en que nos aproximamos al proceso de diseño en términos de concepción y producción. Los participantes serán introducidos en el uso de softwares de modelado 2d y 3d para la generación de geometrías que serán posteriormente mecanizadas in situ en una máquina de control numérico CNC de 3 ejes.
¡AL FINAL DEL CURSO TE LLEVAS TU LÁMPARA A CASA!
Profesores: Equipo MEDIODESIGN* + TOOLINGROUP*
*Official Rhino Trainners. Acreditación otorgada por McNeel, desarrolladores del software Rhinoceros.
Lugar: Mediodesign. Pallars 85-91 5-2 BCN
Duración: 16 / 20 horas
Fecha: sábado 9 / domingo 10 julio de 2011
Horario: de 10h a 14h / de 16h a 20h
Plazas: 20 participantes
REQUISITOS
< Dirigido a estudiantes y profesionales de la arquitectura, diseño y profesiones afines.
< Ordenador portátil.
< Softwares instalados. En el momento de la inscripción, los participantes recibirán las instrucciones para la descarga e instalación de versiones gratuitas (trials) de los softwares.
CONTENIDOS
< Introducción al diseño avanzado y la fabricación digital.
< Entorno Rhinoceros y sus plug-ins.
< Herramientas y estrategias de trabajo CNC.
< Materiales y sus características.
< Planteamiento del ejercicio: diseño de una luminaria
< Desarrollo del archivo de RhinoCam para el mecanizado CNC.
< Mecanizado y post-producción.
< Entrega de propuestas: Presentación en formato digital del proceso de diseño y fabricación (pdf, powerpoint, etc…) y del prototipo de luminaria realizado.
INSCRIPCIONES
Precio: 199 € Materiales incluidos.
Forma de pago: mediante transferencia bancaria.
Límite fecha de inscripción: lunes 4 de julio 2011
Se otorgará certificado de asistencia. …
etric/parəˈmɛtrɪk/adjectiverelating to or expressed in terms of a parameter or parameters.art/ɑːt/nounthe expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.// Summer School 2017 3 day intensive workshop for design students & professionals will delve into computational & parametric methods (using Rhino3D & Grasshopper3D) to create data-driven art installations, physically manifested into a space through hands-on fabrication & assembly.The experimental studio will run across 2 cities in India (New Delhi & Mumbai) and investigate the agenda of ‘filling the void’ at art installation scale, through the use of computation and parametric methods. Studio is designed as a 3-day event in both cities comprising of technical tutorials, teaching sessions, prototyping & presentations culminating in a symposium / round-table conference / open discussion with leading / emerging professionals that demonstrate computation, parametric design or alternative techniques in their work / practice / academia. // Cities & Dates*New Delhi – 30th June to 2nd July 2017 (Friday to Sunday)Mumbai – 7th July to 9th July 2017 (Friday to Sunday)//VENUE: DELHI: Startup Tunnel, Vihara Innovation CampusD-57, 100 Feet Rd, Pocket D, Dr Ambedkar Colony, Chhattarpur, New Delhi - 110074MUMBAI: Raffles Design International, MumbaiHi Life, 2nd Floor, Phirozshah Mehta Road,Santacruz (W). Mumbai – 400054// Registration DatesAll Registrations End 4 days prior to workshop start date (Or till seats last)// About rat[LAB] EDUCATIONrat[LAB] EDUCATION is an initiative by rat[LAB]-Research in Architecture & Technology (www.rat-lab.org) to start a new discourse in architecture & parallel design disciplines with the use of ‘computational design’ & it’s various subsets. Spread across various cities / countries, we are establishing a global dialogue in the domain of computational design by actively organizing and participating in workshops, lectures, presentations & symposia. While rat[LAB] has taken a top-down approach of exploring computational design through industry, a parallel, bottom-up approach is also in-line to involve students of all levels, from design & related backgrounds.…
ment.
This course will help architects and designers in their practice and development of forms using generative algorithms.
Curriculum
Introduction to parametric design
Understanding the user interface of Grasshopper and visual programming theory
Understand the components and types of networking
Linking and importing and exporting geometry from Rhino Rhino geometry results back
Knowledge of the main data types (numbers, fields, vectors, points, curves, surfaces, brep)
Manage lists and trees of data: simple tasks lists, extracting data in lists and trees
Operations with vectors and points
Using colored gradient according to the parameters
Strategies of planar space subdivision: Voronoi
Working with curves and create surfaces : loft, surface from points, attractors
Surface subdivision with Lunchbox: triangular, hex, diagrid
Schedule:
Module Grasshopper beginners (24 h)
10 May – 24 May 2014
Sat:
9 - 13
14 - 18
Language: Romanian
Trainers:
Ionuț Anton, idz arhitectura (ART-Authorised Rhino Trainer)
Dana Tănase, idz arhitectura (ART-Authorised Rhino Trainer)
https://www.facebook.com/cursurigrasshopperrhinoceros
https://www.facebook.com/idzarhitectura
http://www.idz.ro/training/…
Added by Dana Tanase at 2:21am on February 2, 2014
s is the "circularity" of the sections of the ellipsoid by the planes. I measure that by sampling points on the sections, finding their centroid, getting max and min distance to centroid, and trying to minimize the difference between max and min. (As sections are ellipses, I think its accurate enough).
In this example, optimal section (one of the circles in the screenshot below) has a difference between min and max radii of about 9 e-5 , radii are about 10 units, so its not a perfect circle, but not so far.
Then I saw something on the net about families of circular cross sections, so I thought I could try to get some planes parallel to the optimal cut plane found by Galapagos, and cut the ellipsoid to see the results, screenshot shows that .
The radii delta is 1.47 e-4 on average, so it looks like its an infinite family of "circular" cross sections.
Of course there is (are?) another family, as the ellipsoid is symetric.
Important notice: I am not an expert at all in this stuff, just experimenting, so don't trust this at all.…
nd stress of a plate that is supported at two opposite sides (rotational degrees of freedom are allowed) and gravity load is applied. By now I can only verify the displacement of the plate with a deviation of less than 3 % using ANSYS Workbench. Kirchhoff's plate theory as an analytical approach gives a similar result with 10 % deviation.
The van Mises stress and Principal stress results in Karamba are approximately 200 times higher than the results in ANSYS and the analytical results. I tried to find the mistake for several days now and would appreciate any help or similar problems with validating the shell stresses.
Here are the values of the plate:
length: 1 m, width: 0.2 m, thickness: 0.01 m
Material: Steel 'S235' (standard)
resulting gravity load: 0.157 kN
displacement in Karamba: 0.000583 m
stress in Karamba: 116 kN/cm² (=1160 MPa = 500 % utilization!)
stress in ANSYS: 0.57 kN/cm² (=5.7 MPa)
The utilization of 500 % for a steel plate under its own dead weight makes we wonder what is wrong... See the grasshopper definition and the picture attached.
Best regards and thanks for any help,
Robert…
tructures)
Bad news: real-life AEC trusses are far and away from lines.
Ugly news: Rhino is NOT an AEC app by any means nor it would ever be. For AEC app I mean the known 3 (Allplan, Revit and my favorite: AECOSim) and/or proper MCAD apps (like CATIA/NX). In plain English : without exporting (meaning (a) bake in nested blocks + (b) export via STEP) proper structured data (assembly/component) this WIP case is absolutely useless.
why may you ask.
well ... trusses are made with numerous shop drawings like this, that's why:
more soon.
best, Peter…
2. a "deformed" building elevation
I want to compare the deformation of my façade panels from the "original" surface to the "deformed" surface. However, when I split my surface into panels, the panels numbering do not match on the 2 surfaces, so I cannot compare them.
In order to compare the 2 surfaces, I need the panel numbering and panel edge numbering to match on both surfaces. Is there a way to make the numbering follow the same order on both surfaces (i.e. from left to right and from bottom to top) ?
Also, once the above is sorted, I would like to know if is there a way to make the numbering on the surface edges constant on all panels, for example: • Top horizontal edge is always number 0
• Left vertical edge is always number 1
• bottom horizontal edge is always number 2
• right vertical edge is always number 3
and finally, my file seems very slow, it takes a long time to execute every time I connect a new wire, sometimes more than 10 minutes, I am assuming this is not normal? anyway I can make it faster?
thanks!!!…