ng code for Rhino6 and Visual Studio 2013 while typing on Grasshopper 2.0
I launch Rhino and Grasshopper each time, takes about 15~17 seconds to load both programs, it takes about 25 seconds to compile the entire project. Because of this I don't write and test tiny amounts of code, I write and test large amounts, then use the debugger to fix bugs.
As For debugging, yes, i'm able to step into my code via Visual Studio. but most of my time i'm not debugging - i'm developing and making small changes and compiling more than 40 times a day.
40 sounds about the right order of magnitude. Somewhere between 5 and 500 I'd say, depending on whether I'm debugging something big or writing a lot of new code.
I'd love to hear about any suggesstions of ways of work that you do that'll save me alot of time.
I wish there was a way to run Rhino with 'GH Developers' flag that'll run much faster.
You can not load certain plugins when starting Rhino. That may speed up loading times, but probably not significantly.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com…
Added by David Rutten at 3:00am on January 6, 2014
t the maximum potential with the bridge BIM+PARAMETRIC DESIGN ;D
During this Intense Week, we will learn about the power of Rhino + Grasshopper + ArchiCAD with Professional and Useful examples for our Normal Working day :D
You will get Advanced Library Files + Personal Web + Knowledge and Skills to start using this incredible Methodology ;D
Also, the week is having Lectures from different Experts sharing their Computational Working Experiences ;D And Jam Sessions! opening the door to 5 interesting topics to research, learn and experiment together :D
2020 is your YEAR ;D !!!
Complete details and registration……
he concept, moving on to decision making and continuing with digital and generative design tools TO GET THE BEST SOLUTION for each problem.
WHY? The world is complex and ever-changing and we need to be able to handle the volume of information we receive and, of course, to find and choose the best solution. Therefore, we direct our ATTENTION TO THE CAUSE, and not only on the effects/solutions.
We will learn from NATURE, the only “company” that has not gone bankrupt in over 4000M years, and it’s GENERATIVE SOLUTIONS.
> OBJECTIVES <
The participants will work in multidisciplinary groups (ex. architect + designer + business manager + constructor + communication specialist etc.) applying knowledge management tools, different approaches and nature-based optimization methods.
Listed objectives:
1. Improving the generative way of TURNING AN IDEA INTO A PROJECT through problem-solving thinking
2. Discovering nature’s ways of shaping evolutionary solutions
3. Getting out from our comfort zone and working together with other professionals in groups in order to achieve better solutions: Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
4. Learning to use technology to manage information in the decision making process
& surviving the whole week
> ATTENDANCE & COSTS <
> Early bird – until 17th March 2013
Lecture – 15 euro (includes presentations, food& drinks)
Workshop – 100 euro (includes lecture, food& drinks)
> Late bird – until 6th April 2013
Lecture – 25 euro (includes presentations, food& drinks)
Workshop – 120 euro (includes lecture, food& drinks)
…
corner, solid surface, reflectance 0.18, when there is NO direct sunlight on the sensor (illuminance<10000 lux).
Shading Group 1 State 2: curtains along the glass, trans surface, transmittance 0.2, when there is direct sunlight on the sensor (illuminance>=10000 lux).
After the run I checked the ill files in the folder and the shading schedule in the intgain.csv file and found some inconsistency, taking Jan 1st as an example
In the intgain.csv, the shading schedule shows the curtain only covers the glass (state 2) at 9.5,11.5,13.5.
But in the ILL file with no dynamic shading, the sensor point (first column after hour) illuminance is above 10000 lux from 10 to 15. So the shading schedule should be 1 from 9.5 to 14.5, right? Or am I missing something here?
I'm trying to get the lux hours/accumulated illuminance for the test point, but there is no ILL file that actually combined the ill, state-1 ill, and state-2 ill together based on the shading schedule? (My understanding is the "read annual result I" visualizes the Daylight Autonomy based on the advanced shading schedule but didn't generate another ill file?)
I was doing it in Excel and found the difference between shading schedule and the sensor reading. Please let me know if I made any mistakes in the simulation setting! Any comments on a better data processing method would be much appreciated!
Best,
XF
…
resentar Digital Process: Generative Design Technologies Workshop; Taller especializado que se llevara a cabo en 4 de las ciudades mas importantes de la republica mexicana [Puebla] [Mexico DF] [Guadalajara] [Leon] en Enero y Febrero de 2012. http://gendesigntech.wordpress.com/
Enfocado principalmente a arquitectos, diseñadores industriales, diseñadores de interiores, Urbanistas, Artistas digitales, estudiantes y profesionistas afines al diseño; este Workshop tiene como objetivo proporcionar a los participantes los conocimientos y recursos tecnológicos que les permitan desarrollar los elementos de un proyecto desde la concepción hasta su aplicación de manera completa. Apoyándose en un conjunto potente y flexible de plataformas, los participantes aprenderán a generar, analizar y racionalizar morfologías complejas, formas orgánicas libres y algoritmos computacionales avanzados así como a producir visualizaciones fotorealístas aplicables en diversos proyectos de Diseño. A lo largo de 5 dias de intenso trabajo, exploración y retroalimentación los participantes seran guiados en el desarrollo de un flujo de trabajo mas dinamico, que les permitira explotar al maximo el potencial de las herramientas y potencializar sus habilidades, aptitudes y capacidades. Instructores: Leonardo Nuevo Arenas [Complex Geometry] José Eduardo Sánchez [DesignNest] Daniel Camiro/Luis de la Parra [Chido Studio] http://issuu.com/chidostudiodiseno/docs/digprowork Conoce el programa aquí. http://gendesigntech.wordpress.com/program/ Para registrarte por favor visita. http://gendesigntech.wordpress.com/registro…
Factor and Vertical Sky Component are using cloudy (overcast) sky as default. You can use uniform sky as an alternative if you want by setting the input to True.
For the annual analysis, Daysim takes care of generating the sky. You don't need to generate the sky for each hour as this is exactly what Daysim does.
If you want to watch the sky for every hour of the year you can use Ladybug genCumulativeSky, selectSkyMtx and skyDome similar to what I showed in this video (minute 1:15): (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3stJVyaRmg). There is an example file for ladybug that called real time radiation analysis that may also help.
Hope it helps,
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Mostapha
…
[with "thickness"] structure - steel/wood/carbon/aluminum (custom or MERO type, with or without cables)
(c) via some kind of hybrid solution combining (a)+(b).
2. Skin:
(a) planar glazing (glass/polycarbonate) or planar opaque insulated composite panels (zink,aluminum,SS, titanium).
(b) "hinged" aluminum frames.
(c) custom aluminum extrusions per edge (that's a bit naive for more than obvious reasons).
But my personal opinion is that - all things considered - a tensile membrane with insulated material (TensoTherm and the likes) is much more economical, handsome, simple and purposeful. The greatest ever stated it clearly: Less Is More, not to mention that other thingy: Form Follows Function.
On the other hand , truth is that all the modular structures are really stunning and utterly challenging to design and fabricate ... but it's hard to justify the cost VS benefits.
On the other hand ... well ... people are always eager to exploit "new frontiers" at any cost and without thinking too much the big picture: explain the reason to use a structural glazing system where the guarantee for the (structural) silicone it doesn't exceed 15 years. Is such a big deal to use a semi-structural solution? …
se will dramatically alter your creative process. This webinar will focus on creating algorithms using lists and transformations in Grasshopper, iteratively developing geometries inspired by nature. Through a series of short presentations and “live” case studies, learn strategies to discover forms that are defined by simple rules and incremental creation.
This webinar will last 2.5 hours including multiple open Q & A sessions. With two instructors offering guided curriculum and continuous support it is our goal to provide you with an in-depth and personal learning experience. A video of the webinar as well as instructor files will be uploaded after the broadcast – all participants will have unlimited access to the webinar content and this video online. Registration can be found below. We look forward to your participation!
Topics:
What’s an algorithm and how do I define one?
Isn’t Grasshopper already a “Graphical Algorithm Editor”? How is an Algorithmic Design different from Parametric Design?
What is the difference between incremental versus all-at-once execution? What creative opportunities does each provide?
I have a few simple transformations within my sketch. How can I compound them to discover new forms?
…
2013 | mayo 30, 31 y 1 de junio. 15 Hrs.
Horario: 18:00 – 22.00 Jueves, Viernes y Sábado de 8:00 a 16:00 Hrs. Instructor_ Arch. David Hernández Melgarejo.
http://bioarchitecturestudio.wordpress.com
Objetivos:
El curso está dirigido a cada diseñador, ingeniero o arquitecto que quiere obtener una sólida base en modelado generativo y paramétrico dentro del flujo de trabajo en Rhinoceros.
En el curso se explorarán y construirán estructuras en el espacio paramétrico, incorporando entidades geométricas (Curvas, Superficies, Puntos, etc…) y usando patrones algorítmicos.
Cada paso será soportado con ejercicios que gradualmente incrementarán su complejidad.
El alumno aprenderá cómo trabajar con asociación geométrica y parámetros. Para perfeccionar asociación geométrica – asociación entre partes, asociación dinámica – las formas geométricas son generadas al seguir la conexión lógica entre la parte geométrica y su restricción, dimensión paramétrica y él proceso dinámico del diseño: en pocas palabras estimulamos el pensamiento relacional.
Resultados:
Los participantes con éste entrenamiento obtendrán las siguientes fundamentos.
· Construir, modificar, depurar y correr aplicaciones de Grasshopper.
· Comprender el editor gráfico algorítmico y sus patrones usando grupos y cables conectores.
· Trabajar con dimensiones dinámicas, parámetros y listas.
· Generar aplicaciones orientadas a la documentación del diseño y la fabricación.
Palabras clave:
Diseño Computacional, Scripting, Rhinoceros 5.0 + Grasshopper, Parametrización, Análisis, Fabricación Digital.
Para mayor información:
MArch. Kathrin Schröter. E-mail: kschroter@itesm.mx
Dirección de Arquitectura. Oficinas de Aulas 1, segundo piso.…