of doing this.For instance :
one for 25°C> T(in) > 23°C and T(out) < 23°C
one for 27°C> T(in) > 25°C and T(out) < 25°C
one for 29°C> T(in) > 27°C and T(out) < 27°C
etc etc ...
But this is quite an ugly solution, so still wondering how we could do it in a better way ! (maybe inputing a series of temperature in one component ?)
Bests,
A
…
of the specialized tools that independent developers like Jon include in their plug-ins.
I understand it feels icky to purchase a plugin when the core application is free, but intuition and gut-feelings have no place in economic policy. The only reason to buy software is because it will save you money in the long run. If your hourly rate is $25 and you can eliminate 20 hours a month by buying a $1000 product, you've earned your money back in 2 months and everything else is gravy as they say.
There is a conflict of sorts between McNeel & Associates and 3rd party developers as I outlined in this response, but so far the benefits of having an active 2nd & 3rd party development community have far outweighed the costs. You, me and Jon are engaged in a symbiotic relationship that ideally benefits us all. If you feel it doesn't, then you have the freedom to ignore it or even ask for your money back.
But whatever your personal feelings, it cannot be denied that Jon is providing worthwhile solutions for other people who are probably quite interested to see what he is working on.…
ed list of arcs which have different radiuses. In other words, if I have a group of NURBS cuves, I want to be able to split them up with a series of arcs that have families of radiuses, say every meter.
This means that I could rebuild my NURBS curves in the following way:
NURBS 1: [rebuild with 5 arcs] :
Arc 1 (25m radius) + Arc 2 (17m radius) + Arc 3 (44m radius) + Arc 4 (33m radius) + Arc 5 (12m radius)
NURBS 2: [rebuild with 3 arcs] :
Arc 1 (25m radius) + Arc 2 (17m radius) + Arc 3 (12m radius)
Ect...
In this example there are 2 instances of 25 m radius arcs, 2 instances of 17 m radius and 2 instances of 12 m radius.
These would be fitting to best rebuild the NURBS curves with a tolerance.
I have started by trying to group similar points of curvature along the NURBS curve, but not sure is a good way to proceed.
Not sure if its clear what I want to achieve, but any advice would be great!
Thanks
dan…
looking to achieve is to replace every 25 value in a list with 0, 40 with 1, 15 with 2 and 60 with 3. This is what I have so far:
listArray = x
searchList = y
writeList = z
for n, i in enumerate(listArray):
if i == searchList[0]:
listArray[n] = writeList[0]
elif i == searchList[1]:
listArray[n] = writeList[1]
elif i == searchList[2]:
listArray[n] = writeList[2]
elif i == searchList[3]:
listArray[n] = writeList[3]
a = listArray
Any help appreciated,
Cheers,
…
step-sizes. It starts out with large jumps, then as it cools the jumps get smaller and smaller as does the likelihood of a retrograde jump being accepted as a valid new state.
Most fitness landscapes have more than one dimension and therefore a 'jump' could include any number between 1 and N, where N is the dimensionality of the landscape. The Drift Rate setting —which may well be poorly named— controls the odds that a jump includes an additional dimension. All jumps must be at least one-dimensional, but 25 percent of them (on average) will include another dimension. 25% of those will include a third dimension and 25 percent of those a fourth and so on and so forth until the dimensionality of the landscape has been reached. Here's a list for 1000 jumps:
Drift Rate: 25%
1D jumps: 750
2D jumps: 187
3D jumps: 47
4D jumps: 12
5D jumps: 3
6D jumps: 1
A good question to ask would be; "Why would you want a jump to include more than one dimension?" and the answer is that the more genes are related, the higher the changes that a multi-dimensional jump will yield an improvement. It's not difficult to imagine that you cannot improve your current state by only modifying a single gene. Sometimes you need to change two in unison in order to reach a better solution. If your genes are highly related (which is bad practice to begin with) then you may need to adjust the Drift Rate to a higher value.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
Added by David Rutten at 11:09am on April 17, 2012
line 15
and...
Error 2 Overload resolution failed because no accessible 'GetData' can be called with these arguments: .... line 25
The errors are paraphrased. Does anybody have any idea?
Thank You,
Will…