5 8, and then the following values are obtain as the last one (8) plus 3, then this last one (11) plus 5, and then this last one (16) plus 8, and then it starts again: 24+3, 27+5, 32+8...
Thanks
…
Added by Jesus Galvez at 5:17am on November 27, 2012
know how to solve.
It appears in
11 - Honeybee Energy Modeling - The Laws of Geometry in E+ Part 3: Curved Geometry
where I need to retrieve .idf file,
and shows this message:
1. Solution exception:'hb_EPZoneSurface' object has no attribute 'punchedGeometry'
I've added .gh file at a state where I meet the problem.
Also, I've looked around the forum and found some mention OpeanStudio related problems, mainly one's lack of it. Could it be the source of the problem, because I only followed Installation Instructions and haven't installed OpenStudio.
…
nput parameter and then set the named values on the second?
protected override void BeforeSolveInstance() { Param_Integer param0 = Params.Input[0] as Param_Integer; Param_Integer param1 = Params.Input[1] as Param_Integer; param1.ClearNamedValues();
GH_Structure<GH_Integer> data = param0.VolatileData as GH_Structure<GH_Integer>; if (data.IsEmpty) return; foreach (GH_Integer value in data.AllData(true)) { switch (value.Value) { case 1: param1.AddNamedValue("First option for 1", 11); param1.AddNamedValue("Second option for 1", 12); param1.AddNamedValue("Third option for 1", 13); break;
case 2: param1.AddNamedValue("First option for 2", 21); param1.AddNamedValue("Second option for 2", 22); param1.AddNamedValue("Third option for 2", 23); break;
case 3: param1.AddNamedValue("First option for 3", 31); param1.AddNamedValue("Second option for 3", 32); param1.AddNamedValue("Third option for 3", 33); break; } return; } }
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com…
Added by David Rutten at 1:56am on December 18, 2013
pen Brep"; I didn't know it worked on flat surfaces. And I think it's only fair to include in your benchmark the considerable time 'SUnion' takes in this example: 21.9 seconds for 121 rings and likely much more with 400 or 1,000+ rings.
Then I noticed the pattern doesn't match. Checked the circles and they are the same. The distance between them, however, is different: 7 instead of 6. When I change that value to 6, the Python fails badly. All the holes and gaps are gone, which destroys the pattern:
I can't do the "two phase" approach on an 11 X 11 grid, but I can do 6 X 6 and 2 X 2 to get a 12 X 12 grid (40 'SUnion' operations) in 28 seconds total. That beats your benchmark of ~37 seconds for an 11 X 11 grid, if you include the 'SUnion' in your code.
…
are on their own paths, but the first branch contains 3 curves and the second one 2 curves. If you want the same result for all pairs of curves you'd need to split up the first and second branches, so that all curves are on their own branch.…
Added by Lars Renklint at 4:33am on September 6, 2009
1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21
1+2+3+4+5+6+7 = 28
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 = 36
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = 45
Is there a tool, that can do me that job?
How do I get this List {1,3,6,10,15,21,28,36,45}?…
Added by Ahmed Hossam at 2:19pm on September 22, 2013