. The rules to dispatch the lines are the next:
I start with a list that alternate true/false; like that: true, false, true, false.
If the angles between those lines are greater than 89° I want to inverse the next part of the list:
True, False, True, False, True, False,...
become
True, False, [>89°] False, True, False, True, [>89°] True, False,...
I managed to create a true false list, to check for the greater than 89° angle, to separate the lines relatively to the angles, but I don't know how to inverse part of the list at certain index.
(In the picture, I have written 90° but it should be 89°, I check for greater than 89° and not equal to 90° because in the real rhino model, the lines won't be exactly orthogonal)
If you have another idea to to reach the same result, it's also okay, I tried to find rules to solve the problems, but I may have overlooked other solutions !
And if there is some part of the patch that are correct but there is easier solution, I would love to learn as I am still new to grasshopper.
Thanks for taking the time to read. :)
…
t it is rounded to 25, 100, 75. I've figured out the rounding portion, but when I plug the resulting list back into the custom preview, it doesn't recognize the data. I'm guessing it is because my rounded list is in curly brackets, whereas the unrounded data straight from the image sampler is not. How can I process this to remove the curly brackets?
Thanks,
Ryan
…
Added by Ryan Dirks at 5:20pm on September 18, 2014
inal surface, creating buckling.
http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/differential-growth-in-curves?id=2985220%3ATopic%3A1313465&page=1#comments
I experimented with many different texture effects. In the end I decided i liked the idea of the outer surface being eroded smooth. With the articulate texture protected within folds.
Full GH (Kangaroo - Meshmachine - Weaverbird - Millipede)…
Added by Nick Tyrer at 5:25am on December 10, 2015
ase to give the same result using a graph mapper with a parabola as in the attached file
Unfortunately it never gave the same result ..... is it a mistake in the book ?!…