tax as rh
if (x<y): print "A-"+xelse: print "B-"+(x-y)
but it thousen't work.
could somebody teach me how to solve this problem, or teach me different way to get a same result.
thank you.…
doing a dummy model with 1 week duration).
However, I think I am running into this issue https://unmethours.com/question/3054/disable-zoneplantsystem-sizing/.
I disable zone sizing from simulation parameters but the OS component still does it, probably due to the reasons mentioned in the post above. Their solution was to delete the design days from the .idf file but I don't want to (yet) go into .idf files. Is there any workaround currently in HB? I can easily be missing something.
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Theodore.…
. C++ arose in the early 80's and it is the language in which Rhino itself is written. C# is the next major version in this language family and it is the one used in .NET development. C# first appeared somewhere around 2001 and has gone through 4 major upgrades since then.
Grasshopper is written in C# and VB.NET (which is the .NET flavour of the Visual Basic language family) and the script components also allow only C# and VB.NET, none of the other c-style or vb-style languages out there.
There is no way to flawlessly convert code from C++ to C#. The two languages have non-overlapping features. Simple mathematical algorithms though tend to be highly portable.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
nto a max deviation from the original geometry of 0.015 (I don't know if this is acceptable) and speeds up the projection by approx 65% and the splitting by more than 80%.
Regarding the long times, it seems that after a certain amount of holes the solution time increases at a higher rate - for example cutting 100 holes takes about 1 seconds, while cutting 800 holes takes more than 2 minutes.
You could split the 30000 holes in smaller groups (using domains and sublists), calculate the resulting geometry, bake it and use it as the base geometry for the next cutting operation - it's a bit tedious but much more reliable IMO than having a computer working for days.
best,
Marco…
would fade out over time when the zoom dropped below 80%.
One-Over-X component would consistently return the highest possible Integer or Floating point number.
Download the new release from the usual place.
If you didn't see the What's New list for 0.8.0008 you can read it on this post.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
ace. I started working from a base file that modified the scaling across the range of a panelised surface according to an attractor point on a line. You'll see that at the bottom under 'remapping distances to the scale factor based on the attractor point.'
That's now redundant, so at the top right you'll see my attempt to get a polyline attractor working which scales (and copies) the panels according to their distance from the line at their centers. I'm trying to do this within a range of 10% original scale to 80% original scale (0.1 to 0.8).
Once again, any help is hugely appreciated. Sorry for the slightly messy file.
Cheers,
Alex…
ome (thesis project) but when I put just the second level in - approx a total of 80 zones in total - it crashes when it should calculate the glazing. However it does it for the first 40 zones (first level) but not when I add the second level. So I am really puzzled to why is that - are there any settings I am skipping?
Any crazy ideas are more than welcomed! I have added the definition for who wants to take a peak. ;)
…
B=20%, C=40%, D=24%, E=80%, F=120%. According to one "global" distance. These relations exist for every point. Now i want Grasshopper to move the points according to the "relations-table".
Is something like this possible? Kangaroo? (i have never worked with it, so where could i start if thats the right tool?)
The basic idea is not to do this with 5 points but with ~100 of them. The result should be some kind of clustered points according to their relationships.
Any Idea or help would be awesome!!
Thank you so much!
Cheers…
polyhedra cells,more specific the Weaire and Phelan structure.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaire%E2%80%93Phelan_structure
The size of each cell is 10mm * 7mm.The whole size of the model that I want to create is a box of 160mm * 160mm * 100mm that is consisted by 900-1000 polyhedra. Moreover this model is going to be 3d printed and imported in a software fro thermal simulations in order to test its performance.First I tried to create a model that it is possible to be 3d printed and has some transformations in order to distinguish for the printer the solid and void part.Although I started with creating blocks and groups and using the array and copy command there are a few problems that I am facing.First the file is "heavy" and not easy to manipulate.Secondly as a next step for my model I want to manipulate the size of the polyhedra in order to create a variety of sizes.For example create smaller sizes of polyhedra at the edges of the model or at the planes of the box and larger polyhedra in the middle of the box.Do you have any suggestions on how to proceed?Is modeling in rhino a good option because until now I have spent hours to built this model and it takes hours also to manipulate.I was thinking to try to use grasshoper 3d as a second option however I am not familiar with the software and think that it might take longer to achieve my goal.Do you have any suggestions for a direction to follow in grasshopper in order to develop my model?I am looking forward for your suggestions.I have also attached some images of the model in this mail.Thank you in advance
Kind regards
Valentini…