act 1st 40 items - then i want to extract next 40 - then i do not want next 80 - after that i want subsequent 40 - the sequence goes on until i reach 800.
i can use series. but i will have to use series many times before i merge them to form sequential list of numbers.
is there a simpler mathematical way?
Regards,
Agneesh
…
f of this idea aggregated together.
http://www.antiprism.com/misc/aux_cell_fcc.gif
It works well when the mirror force is used at certain strengths, but if the strength goes over about 75 or 80, it sucks all the points to the center and crashes Rhino.
I have posted the GH file that I am currently working on which begins with a cube.
Thank you very much.
…
C3%A9cran%202016-03-18%20%C3%A0%2013.15.53.png
The goal is to construct in real life with balloons, in order to calculate and optimize the dimensions of the dome. It is possible to do that in grasshopper?
12596205_570926979731335_407718320_n.jpg
12722403_222050138150108_673888594_o.jpg
Thank you for your help,
Nastia …
think.
The T-flip method is nice and comprehensive.
When I try to do the same with the Mapping Method, the map and values appear higher than the source SPL, at around 80 db at the higher value parts of the mesh.
Am I missing something? Are these not the same metrics? The IR summing is with "Intensity". When I select "Pressure", it does not produce a color map.
Thank you for your help.…
and GH 0.6.0057. I notice that from your JPEG the components name is Diff and mine would be SDiff if I had text view on. Have you got the latest version?
EDIT: I've just looked in the file and you are using 0.6.0019
#item name="plugin_version" type_name="gh_version" type_code="80">
#Major>0
#Minor>6
#Revision>19
#/item>
Try with the latest WIP: http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/grasshopper-060059-available
Danny…
Added by Danny Boyes at 8:32am on January 12, 2010
Hola Danny:
I made a few changes to get the joints and the following occurs:Because applying the function "sdiff" get 80 elements when in fact I hope only 9?
me in 19 different pipeline components. Marginally better, but I'll still need to do this operation approx. 80 times...gulp.
Here's a wishlist request for David: expose string inputs in the Geometry Pipeline for Layer and Name. If I had that, I could change one string to swap my whole geometry set! (My layers have names like "B1 red rail", "B1 blue rail" etc., then the next time I'll want "B2 red rail", "B2 blue rail" etc.)
BTW, I'm happy to script something in C# if it will help: maybe I could write something like the Geometry Pipeline that takes a string input for layer name? Hmmm...
…
educe component.
The problem I'm having is that every segment looks the same. I tried to randomize the seed of the random reduce component, but I couldn't get it to work.
Thanks!…
15 and >90 then add "red" to the strings/int list.
pseudocode :
create list of strings
load bitmap from file path
get bitmap height
get bitmap width
count pixels -> (width*height) -> create a new int (pixelCount)
check every pixels color :
loop till i = pixelCount-1
if hue < 20 and >80 then add "red" to string list
if hue >20 and <40 then add ... etc.
output string list
…
low for 80 people/minute to pass through? Where along this emergency escape route is the bottleneck? What is the greatest distance in this building to the nearest bathroom? Where do I place my 20 square meters of glass along this wall so that people walking through the hall see that landmark for as long as possible?
These are all questions that could be answered by computation (they can also be answered in other ways of course, building models or simulations, studying existing designs, ...).
If taken to the extreme, every question that would affect the design might be answered using computation at which point you'll have computed your entire design. But I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting such an uncompromising interpretation ought to be the goal of Computationalism.…