t it i used a definition i wrote for a 3d mandelbulb (the Mandelbrot fractal in 3d) see HERE
so in the test you will see the sample set to 80. that means 80^3, so its generating 512,000 points
…
the parametric equations.
I managed to do other sorts of spirals, but here I cant get a grip on the integral.
( http://mathworld.wolfram.com/JacobiEllipticFunctions.html )
Calculus has been a while. Any practical hints how to proceed besides reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral ?
Thanks,
Phillip…
%.
I us Revit, Maya, Microstation/GC SDK often and find rhinoCommon the most straight forward and easy to use.
reflector + Object Browser in VS is the best way to learn…
der to use the definition there have to be at least as many sliders as there are curves you selected. I have tested it with a grid structure where it preforms at about 80%.
Richard…
ybody has thought of or Seen in competition renderings. It Shows you in an understandable Way and in a Handy Format the tools you can use to fulfill your ideas. As i am nö Student anymore i don't find the Time to teach myself a Complex prog like Grasshopper-i really recommend it
W…
ing circles with three different radii.
Link to Video: http://vimeo.com/16060472
Work done at Proctor and Matthews Architect:
http://www.proctorandmatthews.com/welcome…
ndom positions which I don't know.
my aim is to spread squares like a grid in a big rectangle, by choosing the percentage between the total areas of all squares and the area of the big rectangle. for examples I want the squares to cover 80% of the rectangle.
the closest thing I could get is by arraying 1X1 small square to cover the whole rectangle, then i scale the small square by 0.8. but the final area was less than 80% so that didn't work well but it is the best I could do.
any idea of a better way to do that?
Cheers,
Ahmad…
Added by Ahmad Kotbi at 10:22am on November 8, 2015
GH) > then define (still in GH) some instance definition (or many: case variants) > then place it according some "policy" (3d point grid and the likes). Note: Only doable with code, mind (C# in my case).
Obviously you can skip the creation part and instruct GH to deal with instance definitions already listed in the Block Manager (say: find the block named "cell666_B3" blah, blah) ... but that means that you can only use them (meaning a rather "limited" parametric approach) and not make them from scratch (meaning a true parametric approach).
But I guess that you've tried the block way in the Rhino environment already. That said I use rather solely this approach in GH and yields quite manageable object collections - I would say "real-time" response (up to 20K instances) but I use dedicated Xeon E5 1630 V3 workstations (with NVida Quadros K4200 and up for the graphic response part of the equation) so the "performance" is rather a subjective thing.
Modifications:
easily doable with GH (on instance definitions at placing time: since you need only to scale them and not vary their topology).
Anyway post a portion of the R file.…