FORE MeshMachine (rather better) or after
BTW: For a mesh with 7M points ... well... you'll need some proper CPU to deal in a reasonable amount of time (what about a Xeon E5 1630 V3?).
Alternatively find a friend who knows very well Modo ... and see first hand what the US Movie Industry is all about.…
ptimization of any kind. If I were to add a space voxelization algorithm to it I could probably do away with 90% of the force vectors in a large particle cloud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmsbzTf79bc
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
Added by David Rutten at 5:35am on December 16, 2009
mbers in a panel, but that just sees them as a text blob. Is there an easy way to do this?(Alternatively, I'd like to define a list like [True, True, False, True, False] -> for use with the dispatch function. Presumably, this will have the same solution?)…
try
Tetrakaidecahedron and Dodecahedron, wich have different kind of faces, hexagons and pentagons (Tetrakaidecahedron) and only pentagons (Dodecahedron)
With galapagos is quite easy to test different types of unions, but i have just been able to connect Tetrakaidecahedron with Tetrakaidecahedron, or Dodecahedron with Dodecahedron.
When i try to use both geometries, galapagos tries to connect hexagons and pentagons, so some unions wont work at all.
I think i have to list out hexagons so they onley connect with hexagons, but i have not been able to do it using galapagos
here you can find what i have at the moment
any advice is appreciated.
best
mario…
Added by MARIO VERGARA at 1:01pm on September 3, 2010
80%93Clark_subdivision_surface
and here is the image I got the weights properly, but it seems that weights equation for the original vertex is more like :
(F+2R+(3/n)P)/n
F=face center's average
R = edge center's average
P = original point
n = number of faces at P
using wikipedia notation.
…
epaired the missing xml closing statements, but a lot of data is missing from this file. Ddi you make it yourself or did you download it?
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
Added by David Rutten at 3:44pm on February 6, 2011
e same time consider gravity (gravity on) at the crosssectionoptimization?
And the reduction of the allowable stress to "some" value means what exactly? 80% or more? and is it a discrete or continuous reduction?
Excuse my curiosity and thanks for your help.much appreciated.…
bjectives. I've write my master thesis about the environmental multicriteria optimizations, and usually, you can define the objective according to environmental criterias (concerning the daylight for instance, in the environmental certifications, they say you have to obtain at least 2% of light factor in 80% of the room).Tell me if you find something interesting using wind datas ;)…