Hi slizer,
Is this what are you after:
Are you sure that the middle index in case when you have 11 indexes is index number 6? Isn't it the index number "5"?
tName_FinalProject_PartD.pdf
Below is the desk crit list, please sign up for a spot in the comments below:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
See you Monday!…
should not be open).
3. All releases of Rhino 5, Arduino, GH, and FF are the latest as of May 21st.
I Boolean toggled the port open, but I can't seem to get any output to display from the UnoRead component. I was hoping to see values from any of the analog inputs (APin5 depicted) connected as info gets sent back and forth between the Arduino and my comp. I'm getting simultaneous "Hooray" and "Whoops" messages, and I can't pinpoint why. See attached JPG.
Does it have to do with the fact that I have a list of COM ports? Even though I know COM 3 is the correct one as defined in the IDE, do I need to re-declare it in Grasshopper as well? Does the {0} shown impact this output?
Any direction is appreciated.
Thanks - JFig
…
cture, Rhino treats them as a single flat list. For example a surface can have 10 rows and 6 columns of control-points, resulting in a list of 60 points.
But 10 times 6 isn't the only way to get to 60. If you want to make a surface out of a list of 60 points, you'll also have to tell Rhino how those 60 points should be interpreted in terms of a grid. It could be 2*30, 3*20, 4*15, 5*12, 6*10, and all of the aforementioned products the other way around.
Sometimes there's only one way for a number of points to fit into a rectangular grid. For example if you provide 49 points, then 7*7 is the only way to make it work, but these cases are rare so we always demand you give us all the information required to actually make a rectangular grid of control-points from a linear collection.
As for "Why is it, sometimes we need to attach additional value into it?", this is usually because when you divide a domain or a curve into N segments, you end up with N+1 points. For example take the domain {0 to 5}, and divide it into 5 equal subdomains. You end up with {0 to 1}, {1 to 2}, {2 to 3}, {3 to 4} and {4 to 5}. However there are six numbers that mark the transitions between these domains 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. This is why you often have to add 1 to the UCount, because the number that controls the UCount often results in N+1 actual points.…
Added by David Rutten at 8:30am on December 25, 2014
The best way is to use a C# or a VB component to transpose these
lists. I think in C# you can use transpose directly. You can ask this
on the VB/C# forum on our new website, www.grasshopper3d.com
- Scott
On May 27, 3:56 am, Tonsgaard wrote:
> Being a long time user of Generative Components trying to use
> grasshopper i miss the "transpose" command.
> I have a point list like this:
>
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
>
> and a want to transpose dimensions to:
>
> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
> 2, 2, 2, 2, 2
> 3, 3, 3, 3, 3
> 4, 4, 4, 4, 4
> 5, 5, 5, 5, 5
>
> Surely I am not the first in need of this...
> how would i go about and do this...? I suppose its quite easy in VB
> script, but being used to GC's C# like language, I kinda dont know how
> to do this...
>
> thanks...
>
> Tonsgaard…
branches in each A's list of B's, or remove its ends etcso that if I want to remove the last B in every A{0;1},{0;2},{0;3},{0;4},{0;5},{0;6}{1;1},{1;2},{1;3},{1;4}{2;1},{2;2},{2;3},{2;4},{2;5}would become{0;1},{0;2},{0;3},{0;4},{0;5}
{1;1},{1;2},{1;3}
{2;1},{2;2},{2;3},{2;4}I guess the question is do I need to figure out the cull pattern- each B may have different lengths...…
ches it with the first branch in Tree B (and then the first branch in Tree C if more than two trees are involved).
I'm planning to add better branch matching logic, but I'm not going to touch it until I have a good idea about what's needed and how it can be accomplished without breaking existing files.
So, the branch "address" is only used to sort the branches in a single tree. Thus, a tree with the following branches is always sorted in the exact same way:
{0;0}
{0;1}
{0;2}
{0;3;0}
{0;3;1}
{1;6}
If you have another tree with different branches:
{0}
{1}
{2}
{3}
{4}
{5}
Then the matching will be:
{0;0} -> {0}
{0;1} -> {1}
{0;2} -> {2}
{0;3;0} -> {3}
{0;3;1} -> {4}
{1;6} -> {5}
As long as people adhere to your advice: "it is best for the addresses of each tree branch to be in the same format", there will be no problem. But it is at the moment extremely difficult to perform complex matchings.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
Added by David Rutten at 9:25am on August 11, 2010