Grasshopper 0.7.0014 available for download

Dear testers,

Grasshopper 0.7.0014 is available for download.

This release fixes a number of serious bugs with file reading and scripting components. If you've been using an earlier 0.7 beta, please upgrade to this version.

Grasshopper 0.7 undoubtedly still contains many bugs and should not be used for important work/files as it is less reliable than 0.6.X

David Rutten

david@mcneel.com

London, UK

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by CarloMaria Ciampoli on May 16, 2010 at 2:48pm: thanks David!; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Daniel Piker on May 16, 2010 at 3:57pm: Thanks David! Awesome stuff; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by raf2205 on May 16, 2010 at 4:04pm

Hi David,
I opened a definition wrote in GH 0.6.0059 in this new release 0.7.0014 you just posted and had the following warning message.
Can you please light me on this ?

thanks

raf

Attachments:

errors.png, 8 KB

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on May 17, 2010 at 1:09am: Hi raf,

can you send me the file?

--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
London, UK; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Tuan N. Tran on May 16, 2010 at 5:34pm: David,

Great release with Galapagos! Can you please post the catenary examples you showed at the AA recently? Thanks.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on May 17, 2010 at 1:10am

Attached.

--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
London, UK

Attachments:

GalapagosExamples.zip, 176 KB

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Tuan N. Tran on May 16, 2010 at 11:46pm: Hi David

I set up Galapagos to solve for the minimum bounding box. It worked great for the generic test case of a rotated box! Thanks again for the release. However, there's some strangeness going on with the bounding box.

On the left is the original with a GH bounding box. The middle is the bottom half (rhino BooleanSplit) with a GH bbox. The right is bottom half with a rhino bbox. As you can see, the middle and the right bboxes are not the same.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on May 17, 2010 at 1:12am: Yes I see. I think RhinoCommon too often uses the quick'n'dirty BoundingBox (which operates only on the control-points of geometry) rather than the "tight" BoundingBox which takes trims into account.

I'll see about getting it fixed.

--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
London, UK; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by quitronic on May 16, 2010 at 11:58pm: thanks David!
Galapagos!!!; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by robert cervellione on May 17, 2010 at 6:47am: any chance of getting a build for rhino 5 64 bit.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Thorsten Strathaus on May 17, 2010 at 8:48am: Hi David,

any chance of finding examples/explanations for the use of galapagos somewhere?

Thanks,

Thorsten; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Thorsten Strathaus on May 17, 2010 at 9:25am

If I get the chance to respond to myself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFOodjZUVhU
as explanation video,

and to shorten your "I try to connect everything to find out what works" period:

Connect some sliders to the Genome-part of Galapagos,
and a number containing parameter to the Fitness-part.

then you should be able to run a calculation test.
In my case, I get some error messages, but the calculation does run.

Thorsten

Attachments: