ace. I started working from a base file that modified the scaling across the range of a panelised surface according to an attractor point on a line. You'll see that at the bottom under 'remapping distances to the scale factor based on the attractor point.'
That's now redundant, so at the top right you'll see my attempt to get a polyline attractor working which scales (and copies) the panels according to their distance from the line at their centers. I'm trying to do this within a range of 10% original scale to 80% original scale (0.1 to 0.8).
Once again, any help is hugely appreciated. Sorry for the slightly messy file.
Cheers,
Alex…
ome (thesis project) but when I put just the second level in - approx a total of 80 zones in total - it crashes when it should calculate the glazing. However it does it for the first 40 zones (first level) but not when I add the second level. So I am really puzzled to why is that - are there any settings I am skipping?
Any crazy ideas are more than welcomed! I have added the definition for who wants to take a peak. ;)
…
B=20%, C=40%, D=24%, E=80%, F=120%. According to one "global" distance. These relations exist for every point. Now i want Grasshopper to move the points according to the "relations-table".
Is something like this possible? Kangaroo? (i have never worked with it, so where could i start if thats the right tool?)
The basic idea is not to do this with 5 points but with ~100 of them. The result should be some kind of clustered points according to their relationships.
Any Idea or help would be awesome!!
Thank you so much!
Cheers…
by arch.tualize and AWARE in partnership with the Städelschule Architecture Class (SAC), Frankfurt and will be held at the campus of SAC from 21 July – 1 August 2014. The lab engages students, architects, designers and game developers with four techniques of prototyping: designer-informed, analytics-driven, crowd-operated and sensor-actuated. Participants learn to use digital and parametric design tools and engage with feedback collected from simulation algorithms, online users and real-world sensors. The acquired knowledge will be applied to designing interactive prototypes ultimately exhibited at an open public exhibition at the Städelschule
To learn more and apply visit: www.summerlab.info…
stepper motors with an arduino DUE ( 84 MHz clock) so would be faster than an UNO (16 MHz).
The problem : The DUE is selectionned, detected and I can open the port in grasshopper, but when I try to send any mouvement with the stepper component.. isn't moving at all.
Also when I try to read the serial monitor with the generic serial read component is also not reading anything coming from the due card (I tried the programming port and the USB communon port from the DUE).
To now : Sending mouvement with the Accel Stepper library directly with the Arduino IDE works, Wich means that the problem is directly coming from the communication between the Firefly's Grasshopper component and the arduino Due
The due : www.arduino.cc/en/Main/arduinoBoardDueThanks for your time :-)…
polyhedra cells,more specific the Weaire and Phelan structure.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaire%E2%80%93Phelan_structure
The size of each cell is 10mm * 7mm.The whole size of the model that I want to create is a box of 160mm * 160mm * 100mm that is consisted by 900-1000 polyhedra. Moreover this model is going to be 3d printed and imported in a software fro thermal simulations in order to test its performance.First I tried to create a model that it is possible to be 3d printed and has some transformations in order to distinguish for the printer the solid and void part.Although I started with creating blocks and groups and using the array and copy command there are a few problems that I am facing.First the file is "heavy" and not easy to manipulate.Secondly as a next step for my model I want to manipulate the size of the polyhedra in order to create a variety of sizes.For example create smaller sizes of polyhedra at the edges of the model or at the planes of the box and larger polyhedra in the middle of the box.Do you have any suggestions on how to proceed?Is modeling in rhino a good option because until now I have spent hours to built this model and it takes hours also to manipulate.I was thinking to try to use grasshoper 3d as a second option however I am not familiar with the software and think that it might take longer to achieve my goal.Do you have any suggestions for a direction to follow in grasshopper in order to develop my model?I am looking forward for your suggestions.I have also attached some images of the model in this mail.Thank you in advance
Kind regards
Valentini…
. etc. So it's 80020 which is ~1058. Assuming you're allowed to use the same component more than once.
1058 × 1049 = 10107 total possible algorithms. When talking about big numbers I only have three frames of reference. The distance from us to the edge of the observable universe is roughly 1029 millimeters, the observable universe contains 1080 protons and the volume of the observable universe is roughly 5×10105 cubic nanometers. So you could more or less put a different valid Grasshopper algorithm into every cubic nanometer of this universe.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
in the .gh-file below. However, it takes a very long time to generate this calculation, even four about five panels or so, while I have about 1600 on the hyperbolic paraboloid. You once told me in another discussion that the TOF component did less calculations than the PV Surface component and would therefore be faster. However, it seems to go even slower when you have multiple surfaces.
So what I would like to know is how to have an idea of which PV panels would be worth of keeping on the hyperbolic paraboloid. For instance, to visually represent the panels with a TOF of >90%, >80%, >70% and so on, without too long calculation time.
(You will have to zoom out quite a bit to see the surfaces. The TOF component is in the red group and there is some part of the code that is irrelevant for this question, but it's quite clear.)…
gn-by-many-designbymany/
The first sponsored challenge is to create a parametric version of Buckminster Fuller’s Dymaxion House.
It would be AWESOME to see it done in Grasshopper! And.. You can win a pretty sweep HP desktop plotter. The deadline is this Friday.
Hope to see you on the site and look for some new GH and RhinoScript videos coming soon.
Thanks,
Dave…
Added by David Fano at 12:28am on December 15, 2010
een them to be adiabatic (at first. See later on for an alternative).
The whole process is fine/clear up to the solveAdjacencies: The walls are defined as "outdoors" and "surface" for the boundary conditions. So far so good.
Now i get to the HB_makeAdiabaticByType, and some issues appear (See A in the file).
Setting the interiorWalls to True doesn't change the condition from"surface" to "adiabatic" (A1 in file).
Setting the walls set both internal and external, to adiabatic (A2 in file). Is this supposed to work like this? Why the just the internal doesn't make the change?
In addition to this i'll appreciate your advice in the following. Let's say that i want the internal walls to be divided in 2 parts each. One should be adiabatic and the other "air wall". How do you recommend to do this? Is the modeling in the file correct, or i must do surface by surface?Or using the Decompose Honeybee Zone ...?
How can i retain the air walls and still use the makeAdiabaticByType component?
Thanks for your help!!
-A.
…