t to make 4 polylines (with a different number of vertices - total: 14points)
I would like the Selection component to give me back 3 x 4 groups for making the polylines. Or 3 x 14 points.
The Selection ran only 14 times, just for the first point-grid.
This is where I am so far..
I tried a graft on the List-input of the selection to tell the selection to do the run 3 times with an unexpected result.. Something is missing..
Suggestions anyone?
Best regards,
Bart…
Added by Bart Goormans at 7:40am on October 31, 2015
he sunPath component works. For example if you want to simulate the hours from 8 to 16 it means you want 8 hours from 8 to 9, from 9 to 10,.... from 15 to 16 (8 hours duration period) so you get from the sunPath component (using default timeStep 1) the 9 sun position/vectors 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (in the image the yellow suns). The things is that if you ask for a smaller timeStep for example 3 = 20 mins then the additional sun position (in the image the orange suns) are added also after the time limit of h16 so probably when you don't want/need. I understand that when you input a time period there is the ambiguity if the hours are the just 9 (the 9 inputs) or the 8 hours included between pairs of hours, but I would make in a way that it is possible to chose if the extra timeStep after the last hour are added or not. Thank you for your comments.
…
o 3 max.
Is there a way, that i can sort the items in my second list such that all the items which are 0 in 1st list are sorted differently. and so on.
so at the end i need 4 lists. 0,1,2,3.
It would be great even if you direct me towards the right component.
Thanks a ton.
…
s. The epw weather file and
the GenCumulativeSky.exe are working properly. Can you imagine some issue?
I attach an image of the definition. As you can see from the Panel attached to the
genCumSkyResult output all the items are 0 (up to the 25th line is visible but also
all the others are). The report output says that "There were 3 sun up hours in this climate file", is it ok? Thank you.
Best
Francesco
…
Hi, I have a problem with data tree, i need reduce {0;0;0;0;0...}, but i dont know how I could do it, maybe with path mapper, but there are other way?
Thanks.
0;2}. So when I simplify all the inputs to merge, it does what is expected and bundles everything together into the {0},{1} and {2} lists.
But now the patch can also produce just single branches, so one in the format {0} and one in the format {0;0;0}. Simplify does nothing to those paths and therefore merge results in two branches.
Anyone have a workaround for simplifying single data streams (but not flattening). I know I can just check the number of branches and then switch to a different merge that flattens the inputs, but I would rather use just a single node which accomplishes this. To be honest, I dont understand why simplify ignores single branches.
Here is another example.
2 branches:
1 branch:
…