t the sum of the three parts equals the length of the original list). This will generate a tree of lists. If you want these lists to actually have separate outputs, you can either [Explode] the tree, or you need to use other kinds of components.
For example you could use [Split List] twice, once to split the lists into parts A&B vs. C, and then another Split List component to split the still combined A&B into separate A and B lists.
Or perhaps use three individual [Sub List] components, all with different domains that represent your desired list lengths. So using your numbers, the first splitting domain would be from 0 to 21 (for a total of 22 points), your second splitting domain would go from 22 to 25 (giving you the next 4 items) and the third domain would go from 26 to 41 (giving you the last 16 values).…
NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS". I'm not sure of where to start in troubleshooting this. I've attached the file.
Thank you,
See the errors and warnings below:
{0;0;0}
0. Current document units is in Meters
1. Conversion to Meters will be applied = 1.000
2. [1 of 8] Writing simulation parameters...
3. [2 of 8] Writing context surfaces...
4. [2 of 8] Writing context surfaces...
5. [3 of 8] Writing geometry...
6. [4 of 8] Writing Electric Load Center - Generator specifications ...
7. [5 of 8] Writing materials and constructions...
8. [6 of 8] Writing schedules...
9. [7 of 8] Writing loads and ideal air system...
10. [8 of 8] Writing outputs...
11. ...
... idf file is successfully written to : R:\Green\SuRG\Building_Performance_Analysis\2016_analysis_studies\Energy_Analysis_Comparison\Honeybee_+_Ladybug\tutorial01\EnergyPlus\tutorial01.idf
12.
13. Analysis is running!...
14. ...
...
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
15.
16. Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 8.5.0-c87e61b44b, YMD=2016.10.31 11:39,IDD_Version 8.5.0
17.
18. ************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:
19.
20. ************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...
21.
22. ************* 24 Sizing:Parameters,
23.
24. ************* Only last 1 lines before error line shown.....
25.
26. ************* 25 None, !- Heating Sizing Factor
27.
28. ** Severe ** IP: IDF line~25 Invalid Number in Numeric Field#1 (Heating Sizing Factor), value=NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS
29.
30. ** Warning ** IP: Note -- Some missing fields have been filled with defaults. See the audit output file for details.
31.
32. ** ~~~ ** Possible Invalid Numerics or other problems
33.
34. ** Fatal ** IP: Errors occurred on processing IDF file. Preceding condition(s) cause termination.
35.
36. ...Summary of Errors that led to program termination:
37.
38. ..... Reference severe error count=1
39.
40. ..... Last severe error=IP: IDF line~
, value=NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS
41.
42. ************* Warning: Node connection errors not checked - most system input has not been read (see previous warning).
43.
44. ************* Fatal error -- final processing. Program exited before simulations began. See previous error messages.
45.
46. ************* EnergyPlus Warmup Error Summary. During Warmup: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.
47.
48. ************* EnergyPlus Sizing Error Summary. During Sizing: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.
49.
50. ************* EnergyPlus Terminated--Fatal Error Detected. 1 Warning; 1 Severe Errors; Elapsed Time=00hr 00min 9.34sec
51.…
ith mything and ShapeDiver.
Taught by
Eva Blšáková - Zaha Hadid Studio Vienna
Andrei PAdure - DesignMorphine / Digital Matters
Apply Now and view details at: www.designmorphine.com/workshop/future/algorithmic-accessories-v3/
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/designmorphine
and Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/designmorphine/…
at heating results. First simulation gives me 22 kWh/m^2 on annual base and the next one 1.06 kWh/m^2 on annual base. That's just example. Each result is different for each simulation.…
10 from the other list and insert/splice them into the original list (at the specified index, not appended to the list end) while overwriting the values contained therein- how would I go about this task? Ideally, I could then, in a second step, take yet another range of indices (20, 22.. whatever) from another list and splice them in again.
Any thoughts?
Thanks & g'nite
Max…