、、、不同角度的理解、诠释、运用和发掘规律、、、
新闻或者幻觉:马王堆墓穴中发掘出了丝绸做的鞋,不算是现代意义上真正的鞋,但是完成了一个完整的公式。
有一部分需要是共同的,在离开了沙滩和草地的时候。
找一个成熟的不一样的数学思维合作者,(可以一起申请参加sg2014活动,也可以不)
我想听到人们写给自己的语言,我不害怕听不懂;
也不在意你能看到我的美丽的脚和我们美丽的城市。
你存在?存在0.1%?如果≥1/4
With the two version of the PDF in the file upload, doubt, 10th should be able to see the many PDF.
There are some scruples, confusion ——"The additional property of professional activities",——Subject classification, commercial, regional、、、
There is a place Africa, people don't wear shoes, A few people with grass or leather on the foot (and buildings——In order to spatial density) winding,
the manufacture of shoes, two sales do two judgment:
A There is no life belongs to shoes
B this is the market.
I spent a lot of energy explained to students, which is not to do programming people do、、、 the different angle understanding, interpretation, application and explore the law、、、
The news or illusion:Mawangdui tomb unearthed silk shoes , is not the modern sense of true shoes, but the completion of a complete formula.
There is a need is common, when they leave the beach and grass.
Find a mathematically mature different thinking partners,(Can apply to participate in the activities of the sg2014, also can not)
I want to hear people wrote their own language, I am not afraid of don't understand;
Don't care what you can see my beautiful feet and our beautiful city.
Do you have? There are 0.1%? If ≥1 / 4 You know what I did wheni found out about you?
msxf6688@163.com
…
ts to the fundamental concepts and essential skills necessary for effectively designing with Rhinoceros Grasshopper. In a fast-paced and hands-on learning environment, participants will explore concepts such as parameters, data types, data structures, composing algorithms, as well as the creation and manipulation of computational geometry through parametric modeling interfaces. …
Added by Yasser Hafizs at 11:16pm on December 3, 2016
e aquí!
Course Description:This course is for design professionals who are looking to efficiently learn concepts and features of Grasshopper at an accelerated pace in an instructor-led online environment. The online course will meet for a total of four sessions. We will have a short orientation to cover the GoToTraining module. The Grasshopper training sessions will be split into three half-day sessions. Details...
Horario:Introducción – Febrero 22, 2016De: 9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. (EST) Clases – Febrero 23 al 25, 2016Curso: 9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. (EST)Break: 10:30 a.m. – 10:45 am (EST)Curso: 10:45 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. (EST)Q&A (Preguntas y tarea) de 1:00 p.m. – 1:35 pm (EST)Para Registrarse:correo electrónico: Jackie Nasserteléfono: 305 513 4445http://mcneelmiami.com/online___espanol/m/1/15/2016…
Join Somewhere Something in Downtown Los Angeles for Summer 2016 workshop series.
Physical Computing with Firefly / August 27
GIS in Grasshopper / August 28
Grasshopper Plugins / September10+11
component I just used different components and GH tools to do the same - and this become part of my short paper submission for SimAUD 2016). My solution compares the height of the same points of different solar envelope and then chose the lowest one. I read about the improvement you are working on and it is good but I think it is not yet what I need (or how the solar envelope tool could be more complete).
What I need is a solar envelope that would guarantee on different facades with different orientations (the example I sent you) a certain amount of direct sunlight, say 4h per day in a given period for example all the month of June at 60°N. So to guarantee the south facing facade I should chose the vectors from 10 to 14. But these are not ok for all the other facades because in this timeframe the East and West facing facades get only 2 hours and the North get 0 hours.
So the fist step would be have the possibility to chose different sun vectors for different facades. For the example I did (the 4 hours in June at 60°N) the south facing facade would need from 10 to 14, the East facing for example from 8 to 12, the West facing facade from 12 to 16 and the North facing facade from 6 to 8 and from 18 to 20.
If I would chose a single longer time frame that could get all these hours, from 8 to 20 then the resulting solar envelope would result probably smaller than the sum of the four solar envelopes.
But this is not complete yet. I mean the use of different sun vectors on different facades. The reason is that for example when I chose the sun vectors from 8 to 12 for the four hours on the East facing facade how do I know that the sun hit on the facade in that time frame or maybe it is obstructed by surrounding buildings? Since the sun at 60°N (where I live) in June rise at around 3.15 then maybe for that specific facade the sun hit from 4 to 8 and not from 8 to 12.
I did an extreme case talking about 60°N and that maybe the sun hit on a facade at 4 instead than 12, but it is just to make understand the logic. My suggestion for a more advanced solar envelope it should be integrated with the Sunlight Hours tool of ladybug. So the input should not be the sun vectors because I don't know when the sun hit on the facade but the input should be just the desired number of hours and the possibility to specify different number of hours for each facade. Then this last component that sum different solar envelope (I didn't use it yet but I understood what it does) should be integrated yes so the result would be one single solar envelope more likely using the lowest points (the highest I don't understand what for).
Let me know what you think!
…
s has never exactly been easy and appears to be quite brittle.3) It is advisable to stick to pure Python modules or .NET libraries (in the latter case, math.net appears to be an appropriate candidate to replace Numpy).…