The best way is to use a C# or a VB component to transpose these
lists. I think in C# you can use transpose directly. You can ask this
on the VB/C# forum on our new website, www.grasshopper3d.com
- Scott
On May 27, 3:56 am, Tonsgaard wrote:
> Being a long time user of Generative Components trying to use
> grasshopper i miss the "transpose" command.
> I have a point list like this:
>
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
>
> and a want to transpose dimensions to:
>
> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
> 2, 2, 2, 2, 2
> 3, 3, 3, 3, 3
> 4, 4, 4, 4, 4
> 5, 5, 5, 5, 5
>
> Surely I am not the first in need of this...
> how would i go about and do this...? I suppose its quite easy in VB
> script, but being used to GC's C# like language, I kinda dont know how
> to do this...
>
> thanks...
>
> Tonsgaard…
in the desired order.
0 = 0
1 = 1
2 = 6
3 = 7
4 = 8
5 = 9
6 = 12
7 = 13
8 = 2
9 = 3
10 = 4
11 = 5
12 = 10
13 = 11
Where the first number is the index and the second number is the actual sorting key. Then you sort these keys while sorting your curves in parallel using the A input of the Sort component.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
x and min values for x,y,z and calculate energy for each optionand collect these results in excel sheet ...
option No. x y z Annual coiling demand(by DIva)
1 10 10 10
2 10 15 20
3 11 10 19
4 12 14 17
5 15 16 15
6 16 11 14
7 18 12 12
.
.
etc
Regards ...
hossam
Hossam.wefki@gmail.com…
lues. What I want to do is combine them so that the structure would be something like:
{4;0}
{4;1}
{4;2}
{4;3}
{5;0}
{5;1}
{5;2}
{5;3}
I tried the method here, but it didn't give me what I wanted, it was just tacking the new values onto the end, and not maintaining their paths. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!…
Added by Dennis Goff at 8:13am on February 10, 2016
{4}-0;3
{5}-6;7
{6}-5;7
{7}-5;6
Here it can be shown that there are two subgraphs containing 0,1,2,3,4 and 5,6,7. How can I use spiderweb (either using scripting or the components) to give me this result when I have many more vertices??
Thanks,
Sam…