First use a series component with start=1, step=42, count=3
Use the output to create a new series component with start=existingseries, step=1, count=11
erations, is not it?
This is what I finally want and how I plan to do it:
In the starting tree, points are listed accordingly to the (11) 4-side-panels they belong to. I need to do a tree where each of the 11 lists contains not the points composing the panels but the points code of the points composing the panels. the point code is the number in the flattened list that refers to the points (like, panel 1 is made of points n 0,1,4,18, and so on). To do this, I suppose that I will use my tree of 11 lists of 33 true-false values, and apply it to cull 11 times a series of numbers from 0 to 32. I ll post it if it works!…
This must be a bug because its true for dividing by all odd numbers:
(i-1)/3
(i-2)/5
(i-3)/7
(i-4)/9
(i-5)/11
....
(i-n)/2n+1
And you can't make it work for even numbers
Added by Danny Boyes at 5:06pm on January 13, 2010
etc.
Group 2 - 1, 6, 11, 16, 21 etc.
Group 3 - 2, 7, 12, 17, 22 etc.
Group 4 - 3, 8, 13, 18, 23 etc.
Group 5 - 4, 9, 14, 19, 24 etc. "
except in data, the branches start at 0, so 'group 1' is branch 0
as for the order of your points, that depends on the input prior sorting...
yrs …
know how to solve.
It appears in
11 - Honeybee Energy Modeling - The Laws of Geometry in E+ Part 3: Curved Geometry
where I need to retrieve .idf file,
and shows this message:
1. Solution exception:'hb_EPZoneSurface' object has no attribute 'punchedGeometry'
I've added .gh file at a state where I meet the problem.
Also, I've looked around the forum and found some mention OpeanStudio related problems, mainly one's lack of it. Could it be the source of the problem, because I only followed Installation Instructions and haven't installed OpenStudio.
…
onsecutive points at the same height then your 'Break at discontinuities' component eliminates the middle point completely and then the 'Interpolate Curve' component gives a much bigger bump in the wrong direction. This was enough to get curves to meet from opposite sides.
I fixed this by changing the heights to 1.1 or 2.9, rather than 1.0 and 3.0, but it took a little while to work it out! Sigh.
I attach a new version. But I actually preferred it as it was before. See what you think!
Bob
p.s. in the first list, elements 11, 12, 23 and 24 go from 1 to 3; elements 17 and 18 go from 3 to 1. In the second list, elements 6, 17, 18 and 29 go from 1 to 3; elements 12 and 23 go from 3 to 1. Given the above fix, these can be easily seen.…
Added by Bob Mackay at 10:40pm on November 24, 2015
e
7. True
8. True <-- this one
9. True
10. False
11. True
12. False
13. True
14. True <-- this one
15. True
16. False
17. True
18. False
19. True
20. True <-- this one
21. True
22. False
23. True
24. False
25. True
26. True <-- this one
27. True
28. False
29. True
30. False
31. True
32. True <-- this one
33. True
Any idea how I can solve this?
Thanks!…