idually and by group
3) Clean up functions to discard failed results
4) Use generated images using windows directories to delete designs (so you can bring one next to each other and discard similar ones)
5) Hide irrelevant parameters
6) View generated images in zoom
7) Individually set limits on filter parameters (using sliders)
8) Reload CAD file without having to close and open genoform
9) Much smaller UI (we want to allow the screen for design work, so the functionalities have been made into pop-ups).
10) Navigate in view to a desired design (by number)
11) Any other features our users want ? (let us know)
We hope that this version is much more easier to use and allows designers to manage what they wish to generate section by section or layer by layer.…
ult, my 3dm is very large.
Another problem, when the fonction is ok, the draw in grasshopper is ok, when i bake i have only a litte part of the opération.....
If you could help me, thank you
[Edit] Here the description in the null item :
{0;0}0. Brep: brep.m_T[43047] trim is not valid. trim.m_type = seam, the edge is manifold, but brep.m_L[trim.m_li=1114].m_type is not outer.brep.m_L[1114] loop is not valid. brep.m_T[loop.m_ti[21]=43047] is not valid.brep.m_F[0] face is not valid. brep.m_L[face.m_li[1114]=1114] is not valid.ON_Brep.m_F[0] is invalid.1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. …
ay be other issues with your geometry, but this is usually the issue people run into.)
Rays will lose energy much more slowly when a room is very reflective, but such conditions only really exist with polished painted concrete. I don't know how many such rooms you've ever been in. I can count them on one hand - and I've been to acoustic reverberation chambers on 3 continents.
Pachyderm works with a ray decimation algorithm. This means that a ray will be traced out to the cutoff time, unless it has lost enough energy that its further contribution to the impulse response is negligible. At this time, the ray is discontinued. So, the more absorption in the room, the less time it will take to run the simulation. So, more realistic absorption coefficients will allow a model to run in a more reasonable amount of time.
Gypsum board/Plasterboard will typically be between 8 and 11 percent at mid and high frequencies, and higher at low frequencies, for example. Concrete, unless polished and painted, is still a little porous, so you can probably make it 3 to 5 percent.
Regarding sources and receivers, adding more receivers adds almost nothing to calculation time (until the every end, when it extrapolates a pressure response, anyway). This is because the receivers are entered into a spatial partition system, which allows it to be done in an optimized way. Adding multiple sources will effectively multiply the calculation time by the number of sources, because the simulation needs to be repeated for each source individually.
Hopefully this helps you figure out how to run simulations with reasonable run times.
Arthur…
h 11 returns two values, and the lists with 10 and 6 return one. In any case, I changed the logic a bit.
Check it out in the other vb component. The idea is just to check if the list is odd or even first with the Mod operator. If the lsit is odd, return the middle item in the list as you have set it up. If the list is even, return the mid items also in the same way as you have set it up. I am attaching the edited .gh file, a Class1.cs file which shows in C# how I set up the component (translated vb code will follow), and the .gha I built from it.
The logic should be a bit easier to follow in this version. Check out the edited vb component in the definition for a 'translated version.'
Apologies for the C# ness...I currently do not have Visual Studio Express installed, just Visual C# express. This one is converting just fine to:
Dim list As New List(Of Object)()Dim out_v As New List(Of Object)()Dim out_i As New List(Of Integer)()If Not DA.GetDataList(0, list) Then ReturnEnd IfDim val As Object = list(Convert.ToInt32(Math.Floor(Convert.ToDouble(list.Count / 2))))Dim i As Integer = Convert.ToInt32(Math.Floor(Convert.ToDouble(list.Count / 2)))If (list.Count Mod 2) Then out_v.Add(val) out_i.Add(i)Else out_v.Add(val) out_i.Add(i) out_v.Add(list(i + 1)) out_i.Add(i + 1)End IfDA.SetDataList(0, out_v)DA.SetDataList(1, out_i)…
Added by Luis Fraguada at 11:43am on September 2, 2011
rested in specializing in the field of Computational design.
The workshop will help understand how Grasshopper facilitates during the design process allowing one to Generate, Automate and Manipulate data.
To Register:
Mail us at intofablab@gmail.com
Workshop Structure:
Day 01: 11 February 2019
Introduction to Computational Processes in Architecture
Understanding Grasshopper and its relation to Rhino3D
Working with fields and Grids (Supplementary readings for Architectural theory)
Spatial Concepts using Data
Day 02: 12 February 2019
Understanding Data in Grasshopper - LISTS
Managing Data in Grasshopper (Supplementary reading)
Experimentation on Massing and Architectural Forms
Day 03: 13 February 2019
Understanding Data in Grasshopper – Trees
Surface Logics (Supplementary reading)
Design Exercise and Prototyping
Day 04: 14 February 2019
Architectural Skins
Day 05: 15 February 2019
MasterClass Project
Introduction to various types of Digital Fabrications
Prototyping of works during the Workshops
Basic knowledge of Rhino 5 is required to be able to take this training.
CERTIFICATION: All participants will receive a Workshop certificate from Authorized Rhino Trainer.
3D Printing: Prototyping of works during the Workshops
Workshop Tutor:
Kavitha M, an Architect and Computational Designer, 3D Printing Specialist is also the co-founder of INTO Design Research, will head the Computational Process in Architecture using Grasshopper workshop. Graduated from Stadelschule Architecture class with Masters in Advanced Architecture Design, has been researching on teaching methodologies on digital tools and their influence on Design thinking.…
sinergetici associati alla compresenza simultanea di differenti strumenti di analisi e digital design all'interno di un processo di progettazione in svolgimento. I partecipanti utilizzeranno Grasshopper (modellatore parametrico per Rhino): l'uso di questo editor grafico di algoritmi si integra alla perfezione con gli strumenti di modellazione di Rhinoceros 3D espandendo le possibilità di corstruire modelli parametrici altamente complessi. Per generare una complessità simile saranno utilizzati collegamenti live ai diversi programmi elencati di seguito: . Autodesk Ecotect Analysis via GECO . FEA software GSA via SSI Durante questi intensi 3 giorni, i partecipanti impareranno il workflow dei plug-ins con l'aiuto di esempi esplorando una panoramica dei differenti software, le possibilità di testare le performances di un progetto o l'uso di strumenti addizionali non legati ad un singolo sistema (es. accentuazione, formazione, reazione parametrica) [english text] The focus of the workshop is to integrate and correlate the synergistic effect associated with simultaneous presence of different digital design- and analysis tools in an ongoing design process. The main attention is set on easy to handle interface , which should be used at a early stage of conceptual design to respond to external and internal influences in a intelligent and sustainable way. Participants will use the software Grasshopper as a parametric modeling plug-in for Rhino. The usage of this graphical algorithm editor tightly integrated with Rhino's 3-D modeling tools open up the possibility to construct highly parametrical complex models. To generate this complexity we will use live linkages to several programs listed below: . Autodesk Ecotect Analysis via GECO . FEA software GSA via SSI In this 3 intense days, the participants should learn the workflow of the plug-ins with the help of examples and get an overview of the different software's, there possibilities for evaluating the performance of a design or the usage of additional tools to be not chained to a single system . (e.g. parametrical accentuation, parametrical formation, parametrical reaction) [.] Dettagli : Istruttori: Thomas Grabner & Ursula Frick from [uto]. lingua del corso: inglese (saranno disponibili tutor di supporto ma è richiesta una conoscenza di base della lingua unglese).
Quote d'iscrizione (min 12 max 20 posti): educational* : € 280.00 + iva professional: € 450.00 + iva * studenti, docenti, ricercatori, dottorandi e laureati fino a un anno dalla data di laurea OFFERTA EARLY BIRD SPECIAL: le prime 5 domande di iscrizione pervenute entro il 31 Dicembre 2011 avranno diritto ad una quota di iscrizione scontata del 20% Quote d'iscrizione E.B. SPECIAL: E.B. SPECIAL educational* : € 224.00+ iva E.B. SPECIAL professional: € 360.00+ iva. ulteriori info, dettagli e iscrizioni: http://www.co-de-it.com/wordpress/nexus-advanced-grasshopper-workshop-with-uto.html…
l use Rhino 4.0 and corresponding GH version, as a result i could not open your Rhino file.
Hence in your definition as i see,
1) Spring Force-1 -Connection has 11 'inter' components. The inter components do not have any input data and hence 'orange'. What are the inputs for 'inter'?
2) Spring Force - 2 -'Connection'has 1 point component. Rest length & Cut off has 'mass addition' data. This force is also orange, could u throw a light on this please?
3) Pull to surface - both forces has no point input, hence it is orange too. could u throw a light on this too please?
4) There are 2 x Cartesian product components not connected to anything.
I realise that partially it could be because i'm using lower version of Rhino. However, ur input will be highly appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Agneesh…