NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS". I'm not sure of where to start in troubleshooting this. I've attached the file.
Thank you,
See the errors and warnings below:
{0;0;0}
0. Current document units is in Meters
1. Conversion to Meters will be applied = 1.000
2. [1 of 8] Writing simulation parameters...
3. [2 of 8] Writing context surfaces...
4. [2 of 8] Writing context surfaces...
5. [3 of 8] Writing geometry...
6. [4 of 8] Writing Electric Load Center - Generator specifications ...
7. [5 of 8] Writing materials and constructions...
8. [6 of 8] Writing schedules...
9. [7 of 8] Writing loads and ideal air system...
10. [8 of 8] Writing outputs...
11. ...
... idf file is successfully written to : R:\Green\SuRG\Building_Performance_Analysis\2016_analysis_studies\Energy_Analysis_Comparison\Honeybee_+_Ladybug\tutorial01\EnergyPlus\tutorial01.idf
12.
13. Analysis is running!...
14. ...
...
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
15.
16. Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 8.5.0-c87e61b44b, YMD=2016.10.31 11:39,IDD_Version 8.5.0
17.
18. ************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:
19.
20. ************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...
21.
22. ************* 24 Sizing:Parameters,
23.
24. ************* Only last 1 lines before error line shown.....
25.
26. ************* 25 None, !- Heating Sizing Factor
27.
28. ** Severe ** IP: IDF line~25 Invalid Number in Numeric Field#1 (Heating Sizing Factor), value=NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS
29.
30. ** Warning ** IP: Note -- Some missing fields have been filled with defaults. See the audit output file for details.
31.
32. ** ~~~ ** Possible Invalid Numerics or other problems
33.
34. ** Fatal ** IP: Errors occurred on processing IDF file. Preceding condition(s) cause termination.
35.
36. ...Summary of Errors that led to program termination:
37.
38. ..... Reference severe error count=1
39.
40. ..... Last severe error=IP: IDF line~
, value=NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS
41.
42. ************* Warning: Node connection errors not checked - most system input has not been read (see previous warning).
43.
44. ************* Fatal error -- final processing. Program exited before simulations began. See previous error messages.
45.
46. ************* EnergyPlus Warmup Error Summary. During Warmup: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.
47.
48. ************* EnergyPlus Sizing Error Summary. During Sizing: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.
49.
50. ************* EnergyPlus Terminated--Fatal Error Detected. 1 Warning; 1 Severe Errors; Elapsed Time=00hr 00min 9.34sec
51.…
EC
1. Between hours 1:00 to 24:002. Current document units is in Meters3. Conversion to Meters will be applied = 1.0004. [1 of 7] Writing simulation parameters...5. [2 of 6] No context surfaces...6. [3 of 6] Writing geometry...7. [4 of 6] Writing materials and constructions...8. [5 of 7] Writing schedules...9. [6 of 7] Writing loads and ideal air system...10. [7 of 7] Writing outputs...11. ...... idf file is successfully written to : c:\ladybug\Freeformtower_IDF\EnergyPlus\Freeformtower_IDF.idf12. 13. Analysis is running!...14. ......
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
15. 16. Program Version,EnergyPlus-Windows-64 8.1.0.009, YMD=2015.04.04 23:39,IDD_Version 8.1.0.00917. 18. ************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:19. 20. ************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...21. 22. ************* 577 Zone,23. 24. ************* Only last 1 lines before error line shown.....25. 26. ************* 578 Freeformbuilding27. 28. ** Warning ** IP: IDF line~578 Comma being inserted after:" Freeformbuilding" in Object=ZONE29. 30. ** Severe ** Out of range value Numeric Field#5 (Type), value=0.00000, range={>=1 and <=1}, in ZONE=FREEFORMBUILDING31. 32. ************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:33. 34. ************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...35. 36. ************* 586 BuildingSurface:Detailed,7341.
…
an be given as 88° and 95°. All three angles must sum up to 180, and we're already 3 degrees over balance. Or maybe the user specifies three edge-lengths: 21, 12 and 8. 21 is bigger than 12+8, so even if the triangle was stretched flat, the two short edges cannot reach the ends of the long edge. The above is easy to test for and I add errors to the component if an invalid triangle is provided. However there are also many angle+edge length combinations which result in invalid triangles.
I could of course test for these as well, but the problem is now tolerance. What if the user specifies a redundant angle of 54.7°, whereas the mathematics tell us that the actual angle is 54.7002°. Is that an error? If so, is the angle wrong or is perhaps one of the edges wrong? Or has the triangle simply been over-constrained? Is there a mathematically robust way of dealing with this? And if so, would that also be the most user-friendly way of dealing with it?…
Added by David Rutten at 2:23pm on August 23, 2014
s 8, 4, 2, 10, 1, 3, 8, 4, 2, 0. But then for the end result to maintain all numbers above 5 but replace all numbers below with a defined number..Let's say zero. So then the list would read...8, 0, 0, 10, 0, 0, 8, 0, 0.…
which will result in creating a check for each branch with one item to be 'matched' (in this case to see if it is included in the domain) with all three domains in the single list. so in the end you get a data tree with 8 branches (derived from the 8 grafted values) with 3 items in each branch, that are the check of each initial value with the 3 items domain list.
thank you for sharing the other option too!.
cheers
alex…
o luck so far. I get the same error every time. I am attaching a print screen. Thanks to anyone who makes an effort
P.S. My PC is running now Windows 8 Enterprise N RTM x64 Build 9200 …
Added by cuki fuki at 1:24am on September 25, 2012