e buttons that need pressing and then call Button.PerformClick() on them. But that requires a .NET exe.
I think you're out of luck in this case, there do exist automation tools on Windows that can start apps and press certain buttons, but I do not know which ones are good and which ones can be controlled via command-line arguments.…
Added by David Rutten at 6:16am on August 24, 2014
lled CGA, which does what I think you are looking for. Download the trial version: http://www.esri.com/apps/products/cityengine2/index.cfm
and then try the Shape Grammar tutorials (6 and 9 of the following page):
http://video.arcgis.com/series/62/cityengine
Best regards,
Eduardo…
Added by castroecosta at 6:40am on November 25, 2012
to the native pixel size for software that support high DPI screens, and only Rhino 5 is scaled x2 looking exactly as in my previous 1080p laptop.
I'm not applying this fix to Rhino 6 as it does support high DPI (and maybe at some point I might want to look at a high res Grasshopper canvas despite the tiny toolbars and unaligned, cropped text).
Rhino 6 and Rhino 5 side by side in the same screen set at 2160p:
…
Added by Vicente Soler at 1:30pm on November 28, 2015
ts (Rhino 6 and everything that came after the plugin itself was written).When I tested it, it had some issues with a large number of lines and if parameters weren't carefully tuned it failed to produce consistent meshes.If some of you has time and skills on their hands, there is the source code available on GitHub (link is in the description). For personal use, time ago I updated a definition by David Stasiuk to make nodes and beams, based on 3D Convex Hull component. You can still find it here:https://www.grasshopper3d.com/xn/detail/2985220:Comment:1745216Warning: in Rhino 6 the Starling Convex Hull component doesn't seem to work well, you can use the 3D Convex Hull from the MeshEdit plugin instead (https://www.food4rhino.com/app/meshedit - just substitute the 3D Convex Hull component in the definition and it should work fine).…
s for some solution "as it is" no matter the cost? (that's an extra stupid approach, very old fashioned). Do you use EvoluteTools Pro and/or Kangaroo for "optimization" ?
2. What is the FEA/FIM stuff in use? Do you expect "from/back" interactions? (If this is not doable ... increase this or that etc etc).
3. Do you validate real-life components with FEA/FIM? By what means you design these components? - present and/or future (inside Rhino?). This makes things "interesting" in a variety of ways (we need to extensively talk about that - Skype). The problem is that Rhino IS NOT a feature driven solid modeling app and thus ... a "certain" bottleneck arrives in no time: In the CATIA world you design ("MANUALLY") a parametric history driven component that "complies" to his parent "directives" (say: the Topology) and/or "imposes" his rules to his parent. This is what we call top<>bottom design approach (would become a standard across the AEC industry pretty soon: in around 123 years give or take some). This is far and beyond from what Rhino can do - but we DO make real-life things don't we?
4. Are all these things under a BIM umbrella ? What BIM? What type of details (blue prints) you deliver? (or you just make the thing?).
5. By what means cost is restricting/encouraging the solution? By what means you get feedback from component(s) cost that is outsourced? (i.e. outside your company). Do you monitor all things via some RDBMS? (that's Data Base).
6. What are the long term plans for dealing with such solutions? Using what apps (even in theory for the moment).…
d to put in to the bowerbird app.
I have a wall piece thats 2x2m and has 1,2x1,2m part in the middle that is 15cm withdrawn from the front so I want the concave front to reflect this distance. so i put my attractor point in the middle and then i want to work with a max and a min value of distance for the so there anywhere are a 30 cm dept in the holes for the wine.
I have solved the max distance but im missing the min
cheers
winerack.gh…
are using rhino 5 planktonMesh (http://www.grasshopper3d.com/group/plankton) and starling (http://www.food4rhino.com/app/starling) are good options when modelling just with polylines with n vertices.…