EP output variables are to calculate outdoorAirEnergy?
Thank you very much!
Output variables on the Read EP Results component:[1] totalThermalEnergy=cooling+heating[2] thermalEnergyBalance=cooling (-)andheating (+)[3] cooling= Zone Ideal Loads Supply Air Total Cooling Energy [J](Hourly)=Zone Ideal Loads Supply Air Sensible Cooling Energy [J](Hourly)+ Zone Ideal Loads Supply Air Latent Cooling Energy [J](Hourly)[4] heating= Zone Ideal Loads Supply Air Total Heating Energy [J](Hourly)= Zone Ideal Loads Supply Air Sensible Heating Energy [J](Hourly) + Zone Ideal Loads Supply Air Latent Heating Energy [J](Hourly)[5] electricLight=Zone Lights Electric Energy [J](Hourly)[6] electricEquip=Electric Equipment Electric Energy [J](Hourly)[7] peopleGains=Zone People Total Heating Energy [J](Hourly)[8] totalSolarGain=Zone Windows Total Transmitted Solar Radiation Energy[9] infiltrationEnergy=Zone Infiltration Total Heat Gain Energy (+)andZone Infiltration Total Heat Loss Energy (-)[10] outdoorAirEnergy= ???[11] natVentEnergy=Zone Ventilation Total Heat Gain Energy (+)andZone Ventilation Total Heat Loss Energy (-)[12] operativeTemperature=Zone Operative Temperature[13] airTemperature=Zone Mean Air Temperature[14] meanRadTemperature=Zone Mean Radiant Temperature[15] relativeHumidity=Zone Air Relative Humidity[16] airFlowVolume=[infiltrationFlow] Zone Infiltration Standard Density Volume Flow Rate+[natVentFlow] Zone Ventilation Standard Density Volume Flow Rate+[mechSysAirFlow] Zone Mechanical Ventilation Standard Density Volume Flow Rate+[earthTubeFlow] Earth Tube Air Flow Volume[17] airHeatGainRate=[surfaceAirGain] Zone Air Heat Balance Surface Convection Rate+[systemAirGain] Zone Air Heat Balance System Air Transfer Rate
Output variables on the Read EP Surface Results component:[1] surfaceIndoorTemp= Surface Inside Face Temperature[2] surfaceOutdoorTemp=Surface Outside Face Temperature[3] surfaceEnergyFlow=[opaqueEnergyFlow] Surface Average Face Conduction Heat Transfer Energy+[glazEnergyFlow] Surface Window Heat Gain Energy[4] opaqueEnergyFlow =Surface Average Face Conduction Heat Transfer Energy[5] glazEnergyFlow= Surface Window Heat Gain Energy[6] windowTotalSolarEnergy=Surface Window Transmitted Solar Radiation Energy[7] windowBeamEnergy=Surface Window Transmitted Beam Solar Radiation Energy[8] windowDiffEnergy=Surface Window Transmitted Diffuse Solar Radiation Energy[9] windowTransmissivity=Surface Window System Solar Transmittance…
Visiting School Rio de Janeiro will collaborate with the Centro Carioca de Design with the support of Columbia University Studio X to investigate new possibilities for the urban infrastructure surrounding World Cup Stadiums. Nation-wide, there has been significant investment to build and renovate stadiums for the 2014 World Cup in order to meet the required standard FIFA regulations (‘Padrão FIFA’). At the same time, there has been a large public demand for equal investment into transport systems, public space, and public programs such as hospitals and schools. The Visiting School will tap into the momentum of this movement, and promote a series of interventions within and around the World Cup structures, proposing new public programs and standards for their legacy. Students can choose to focus directly on the Maracanã stadium in Rio de Janeiro, the venue for the Final match of the World Cup. The intense ten-day workshop will employ computational design and digital fabrication to introduce a design methodology that creatively automates and promotes transformation, mutation and complexity for these infrastructure interventions.
Prominent Features of the workshop
Teaching teamThe teaching team will include a mix of tutors from the Architectural Association, including Theodore Sarantoglou Lalis e Dora Sweijd (lassa-architects.com) of Diploma 17, and locally-based architects, urban-designers and experts, mediated by locally-based Visiting School directors, to promote cutting-edge innovative strategies informed by local political, economic and construction issues.
Computational skillsThe workshop will teach advanced digital modeling and parametric design skills, no previous experience is needed. A group of specialist computation tutors will conduct an initial skills workshop and continue to assist throughout the workshop to develop the individual projects of the participants.
Digital FabricationA series of physical models will be built using digital fabrication techniques that will be taught during the workshop, no previous experience is needed.
Applications
1) You can make an application by completing the online application found under ‘Links and Downloads’ on the AA Visiting School page. If you are not able to make an online application, email visitingschool@aaschool.ac.uk for instructions to pay by bank transfer.
2) Once you complete the online application and make a full payment, you are registered to the programme. A CV or a portfolio is not required.
The deadline for applications is 11thApril 2014.
All participants travelling from abroad are responsible for securing any visa required, and are advised to contact their home embassy early. After payment of fees, the AA School can provide a letter confirming participation in the workshop.
Fees
The AA Visiting School requires a fee of £695 per participant, which includes a £60 Visiting membership fee.
Fees do not include flights or accommodation, but accommodation options can be advised. Students need to bring their own laptops, digital equipment and model making tools. Please ensure this equipment is covered by your own insurance as the AA takes no responsibility for items lost or stolen at the workshop.
Eligibility
The workshop is open to current architecture and design students, phd candidates and young professionals.
…
he resulting STL file has no problems. I was going to make a 3D print of it but I thought I could make it even more interesting.
When I make a duplicate piece of geometry with reversed curve rotation values and combine the 2 together I get this interesting result:
However, after baking this geometry the exported STL file has a huge number of errors - there are literally thousands of flipped normals, multiple mesh parts, and disconnected triangles.
I have tried lots of things to resolve this and none of them worked: converting to meshes in GH, GH mesh smooth, Rhino Solid Union, Mesh Repair, Align Normals, etc. I use 3D Builder to correct STL problems, but it can't fix this one.
An even more interesting shape happens when I twist the above shape in one direction, and then add it to another that is twisted in the opposite direction:
Of course the STL file for this one is even worse because it just compounds the previous problems.
Is there any way to resolve these problems? My GH file is somewhat messy and perhaps a bit obscure, but I'd be happy to clean it up and share it with anyone who thinks there is a way to get this puppy working.
…
Added by Birk Binnard at 11:56am on September 22, 2016
truss right?
2. Trusses are NOT made via lines ... they are made by real-life components like balls, rods and other mysterious (and maybe ominous, he he) paraphernalia.Good news for you: lot's of C# stuff around me that do that (but they are not exactly "entry-level").
3. PRIOR talking to ANY FEA/FIM thingy you need to address clash situations: I mean IF a given node is doable or not (because lines they don't rise clash issues ... but rods/struts/tubes/cones do). Good news for you: lot's of C# stuff around me that do that (but they are not exactly "entry-level").
4. Then you have to use some real-life (or at least some "realistic") components like the ones found in, say, a classic MERO "ball" system (and especially the adapter cones between the balls and the tubes). Or at least "some" of them that outline a "realistic" truss.Good news for you: see above.
5. Then you could validate the whole structure AND the parts VS structural loads: I mean there's absolutely no meaning "doing the whole" without taking into account the load bearing capability of the parts. For instance, say, what happens if the geometry (i.e. the topology) is "capable" but a given bolt is weak? That sort of stuff.
6. Now ... this is Academic ... but following the "abstract" way (I don't care about bolts because I'm a student)... this could teach you the entirely wrong way to use FEA/FIM for validating any structural ability of ... anything. And besides FEA/FIM is used for making the damn thing in the real-world ... and that involves (unfortunately) "some" bolts and nuts.
I can arrange a (rather long) Skype session for a demo of all the above ... but first I strongly advise to post here a finished thing (in terms of 3d component geometry) ... and THEN we can examine the whole strategy: what to export, how and especially what could be an "interactive" (both ways) protocol/strategy in order to give the green light for that truss.
BTW: Kangaroo is a physics engine and as such it's used as an abstract "shape" finder. I have no idea what Karamba does ... but always have in mind: BIM things ... are BIM things (meaning that without a serious BIM umbrella ... don't go out when it rains).…
ulio´s latest bakeAttribute, so it also sets a specified layercolor?
Thanks,
Phillip
Reply by Giulio Piacentino 1 hour ago
Hi Phillip
if possible, you should try to modify layer colors independently from baking. A layer can have only one color, but many objects.
To modify a layer color, use something along these lines:
if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(layer) && !color.IsEmpty) { int n = RhinoDoc.ActiveDoc.Layers.Find(layer, true); if(n < 0) return; Rhino.DocObjects.Layer l = RhinoDoc.ActiveDoc.Layers[n]; l.Color = color; A = l.CommitChanges(); }
Can I also ask you to start a new discussion next time? I hope this helps,
- Giulio
…
w how. Thanks for that. Now I do have some questions.
1. I am using the area weight tool. I am first calculating the volume of the form. I then multiply that value by it's density. So for concrete I am using 2400 kg/m^3 x volume. I then divided that number by the area of the membrane that is supporting the mass. This gives me my area weight. It seems to be working well but I want to verify that this is the correct workflow. I also want to verify that gravity would be turned off since I am thinking it is already calculated within the weight component.
2. I am finding that the new triangular element tool works much better than trying to use EA/L as input for the springs from mesh. Even when I set the timestep, subiteration, and drag I still have issues with getting very stiff materials to work. On the new finite elements tool I wanted to verify that E was in pascals. I also wanted to ask if I use imperial units can psi be entered. Now from what I am seeing the materials are deforming more than expected and to get less deformation and stretch in the mesh area I am finding the E value needs to be increased more than the true material values. Often I am raising E by a multiple of 10 or 100.
I am going to describe my problem and I will gladly share the definition if you'd prefer looking it over but basically I have an inflated membrane at a certain pressure made of a particular material. I then have a certain volume of concrete on top of the inflated membrane. My goal is to review the displacements as the concrete is applied over the membrane and find the proper pressures to apply to keep it free from deformation. I am including a picture from a project that we used kangaroo on and attempted to deal with such issues. It was a class sponsored by Cloud9 architecture held at Art Center College of Design where I was one of the instructors. Hopefully this illustrates the problem. To summarize any example file that shows the best way to implement real material properties and unit based forces would be a helpful reference and would be greatly appreciated.
…
have a bunch of points on a subdivided surface to which i am drawing a bunch of lines from a divided curve (think pseudo solar analysis- subdivided curve is sun path, lines are being drawn from this path to subdivided surface, a.k.a facade panels.) The problem is that for whatever reason there are a LOT (really, a lot, like 5times) of points on that surface now where the BREP and the lines intersect (brep l curve component). To remove all of these extra points I used a brep point inclusion component with a sphere as the brep at certain locations. I got as far as placing the sphere at all of the proper points and generating a true/false inclusion list. The problem now is that i cant use this list as a culling pattern for the original list of points (referred to previously as the list of a LOT of points). So, is there a way to flip the list of true/false values so that everything true is now false and vice versa? I tried dispatching the list of values but this did not seem to work properly. Of the list of 1800 or so t/f values appx 400 are false but the t/f dispatch is giving me about 900 in each. Any help is appreciated and I will upload the script and screenshots tomorrow. As always, I really appreciate all of your help.
Evan…
urve, R=161m and L=-250m. Hopefully the curve is parameterised.
my workflow is as follows:
Generate girder profile, parametric
Sweep along curve
Bake geometry into GH
My utimate aim is to bake to a wire frame and a surface model for two types of analysis 1. 3D space frame ( grillage) and 2. equivalent finite element analysis.
I noticed that my flange widths Bflt and Bflb (top and bottom) respectively and inverted, they are by all accounts technically upside down, can someone cast soem light on this.
I use Lusas as my analysis package and sweeping a curve or surface will generate the higher order geometry a volume. Does the GH deal with this in the same way.
Finally does the resulting BREP require to be further processed to be baked. Processed to say a mesh? Or something else?
Definition attached, oh! chocolate fish to the person who makes me feel less of a numbskull.
Thanks…
Added by Kenyon Graham at 9:26pm on November 23, 2015
tions or components.
Participants will learn concepts of object oriented programming and essential syntax of C# to endeavour into personally extending cad toolsets. The workshop will focus on introducing the .NET language C# and the Software Development Kit (SDK) RhinoCommon.
Topics
- use of Script Component within Grasshopper
- explanation to the .NET Framework
- introduction to RhinoCommon SDK
- basics of imperative / object-oriented programming
- data types, operators, properties
- variables, arrays, lists, enumerations
- methods
- objects, classes
- control structures: conditional statements (if, else, switch)
- control structures: loops (for, foreach, while, do)
- walk-through iterative und recursive code-samples
- use of RhinoCommon Geometry class library: creation, sorting, editing of Geometry (Points, Vectors, Curves, Surfaces)
- adding (baking) geometry to the active Rhino 3DM Document, including attributes (Name, Layer, Colors etc.)
- introduction to the Integrated Development Environment MS Visual Studio Express Edition
- compiling code to dll/gha files (plug-ins) / making your own Grasshopper custom components
Grasshopper wird auf der .NET Softwareplattform entwickelt, und kann ebenso wie das CAD Programm Rhinoceros mit "RhinoCommon", einem Software Development Kit, erweitert werden.
Dieser Kurs richtet sich an Designer, Architekten, Ingenieure und Techniker, welche mit dem grafischen Algorithmus-Modellierer "Grasshopper3d" sowie dem CAD-Programm "Rhinoceros" bereits vertraut sind und einen Einstieg in die Programmierung von Geometrie erlernen möchten.
Der Kurs Grasshopper II folgende Grundlagen:
Kennenlernen der Script Componente
Erläuterung zum .NET Framework
Einführung in RhinoCommon SDK
Grundlagen d. imperativen / objektorientierten Programmierung
Datentypen, Operatoren, Eigenschaften
Variablen, Reihen, Listen, Aufzählungen
Methoden
Objekte und Klassen
Kontrollstrukturen: Bedingte Ausführung, Schleifen
praxisnahe iterative und rekursive Code-Beispiele für generatives Design unter Verwendung der RhinoCommon Geometrie Klassenbibiliothek - Punkt- und Vektorgeometrie erstellen, sortieren, bearbeiten, Flächen und Netze erstellen - Geometrie in das Rhino 3DM Dokument baken, einschließlich Attribute (Name, Layer, Color)
Einführung in die Entwicklungsumgebung MS Visual Studio Express Edition
Kompilieren von Programmerweiterungen (plug-ins) als Komponenten (custom components)
Details, Anmeldung:
www.vhs-stuttgart.de
Trainer Peter Mehrtens
Kursdauer: 3 Tage x 8 h
Freitag, 21.02.2014, 9:00-17:00 Uhr Samstag, 22.02.2014, 9:00-17:00 Uhr Sonntag, 23.02.2014, 9:00-17:00 Uhr Ort: VHS Stuttgart, Fritz-Elsas-Str. 46/48
Teilnahmegebühr 510,00 €…
metrico: Grasshopper. La plug-in di Rhinoceros permette di disegnare abbandonando l’usuale interfaccia dei software di rappresentazione, consentendo un rapporto più diretto con il linguaggio proprio del computer: la programmazione. Questo cambiamento porta ad una radicale variazione del rapporto che il progettista ha con lo strumento di rappresentazione digitale. I partecipanti saranno orientati verso un nuovo rapporto con le forme create che, oltre ad essere frutto di trasformazioni delle entità primitive che Rhinoceros propone, si costruiranno anche in relazione a parametri variabili. Nel corso si imparerà a comporre algoritmi semplici, di carattere principalmente geometrico, in grado di generare forme e gestire i comportamenti delle stesse se sottoposte a variabili esterne.In fine si imparerà a confrontarsi con un contesto evolutivo, che influenza i parametri della rappresentazione portando a dei modelli dinamici.Il metodo utilizzato prevede lo studio di diversi esercizi tematici che offrono lo spunto per affrontare alcuni temi fondamentali della modellazione parametrica. Si tratta di esercitazioni guidate in cui lo studente non seguirà passivamente una serie di procedure ma indagherà il significato dei diversi parametri e componenti che concorrono alla definizione dell’algoritmo.Il corso ha una durata di 16 ore programmate nell'arco di 2 giornate con i seguenti orari:
il giorno 08/09/2012 dalle 10,00 alle 19,00 ed i giorno 09/09/2012 dalle 10,00 alle 19,00. Le due giornate saranno intervallate da un’ora di pausa pranzo.
SCADENZA PREISCRIZIONE: 07/09…