mbre de 9:00 am a 8:00 pm Este taller está dirigido principalmente a arquitectos y diseñadores interesados en el aprendizaje del diseño paramétrico y generativo aplicados a la generación y racionalización de geometrías complejas para su implementación en diferentes procesos de diseño. En el curso se abordarán los conceptos básicos y metodología para hacer frente a diversas problemáticas del diseño mediante el desarrollo de herramientas algorítmicas a través de un lenguaje de programación visual y el desarrollo de esquemas de fabricación digital. No se requieren conocimientos previos de Rhinoceros 3D ni de programación, conocimientos previos de CAD deseables. Estudiantes: 2,500 MXN Profesionales: 3,000 MXN
CONCURSO DE RENDERS - BECA DEL 100% - Parametric & Generative Architecture & Design Grasshopper Workshop.
- Publica tu render en www.facebook.com/3dmetrica - El render con más likes será el ganador. - Fecha límite de votaciones 15 de septiembre del 2012.
Informes e Inscripciones: workshop@3dmetrica.com 04455 28790084 www.3dmetrica.com www.facebook.com/3dmetrica
…
been covered since 0051 (correct me if I'm wrong):
1) Shoot for the moon first -- "Control Panel Mode" which allows for advanced interface design. See Max/MSP for example of modal function. I spent a lot of time laying out control panels so they are nice for clients and team members to look at. I spend a lot of time disabling wire display and dragging sliders and panels and graphs around into nice little clusters. Could be something as simple as a mode that disables the view of all component handles, cleans up graph objects, sliders, etc. I know the Remote Control Panel has been requested over and over again since it disappeared, but honestly it wouldn't be much use to me unless it was a full blown customizable interface. In the meantime I'll stick to my own "Canvas Control Panel" methods. (See below...)
2) More control over graph objects. Right now the bar graph for instance automatically sets the lowest and highest value displayed. Would be nice to be able to set extents manually so that you can compare apples to apples on two different lists that have different extents. Also would love to force the bar graph to show all values along x axis, not just first and last. Same goes for showing the numbers of instances for each value. Now it only shows instance numbers in oddball cases. Would like to force them to show for statistical purposes. Love percentages, but usually I also want accurate tallies. I tend to use a member index sets to generate my own lists.
3) Color input for Vectors -- there are fakey fake workarounds but none that are as versatile as simply having a color input.
4) COLOR INPUT FOR TEXT TAGS -- sorry to yell... this one really frustrates me. I often build interactive feedback systems that involve a lot of different types of data, and it is difficult to convey that input when all text is red (or green when selected).
5) Ability to justify text tags using paragraph controls -- currently default is left-justified. Would like to be able to center text horizontally and vertically, among other things.
6) Ability for text tags to handle multi-line text. Not sure the best way to implement this, but often I find myself wanting to attach 3 items of information to a particular object, and I have to string it all together in one line. Would be great if I could insert a "^M" character that stands for carriage return and have that display as multiline text (used in conjunction with above justification controls).
7) More control over Text panels. Thank you for including justification options... but sadly now it begs the question for margin and header control. Text slammed up against the left edge is pretty unsightly. Moreover, if you have labeled a text box, the drop shadow from the title bar tends to overshadow the first line of text if you have Path display turned off. Would like to add some header space to fix the problem and create a cleaner look.
8) Easier access to text font size. Buried in a Special Font... menu. I want to be able to up up down down (left right left right select start) if you know what I mean.
I guess that's it for now... just the things on the top of my head in this category. Looking forward to installing the new release, have to wait until this major project is over though.
Cheers,
Marc
…
best thing that could be done would be to use a combination of several steps in order to reconstruct the tree how you want it.
First off, you would need to reduce your data down then "base branches" that you want. So what was {a;b} is now just {a}. The result is that all of the data that was in all those sub branches is now all under that main branch. So instead of just having 2 in each sub branch you'll have 2*(no. of branches) in your main branch.
From here on out, we're actually going to use the SubList component to reassemble the sub branches in a more ordered fashion. So after reducing the data, find out the number of items in each branch (list length) and then create an interval from 0 to the number of items. Now you need to divide that interval in a way where the number of divisions allow for the proper number of items that you're looking for. I did this by simply dividing the list lengths by the number of items I wanted, then feeding that into the Divide Interval component.
Then only thing about the divide interval component is that the way it divides is not necessarily conducive to extracting chunks because the "ends" of the divided intervals will tend to overlap. IOW, if I have an interval from 0 to 8, then divide it into 4 pieces (2 items for each sub interval), I'll end up with intervals of 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8. Its not that this is wrong, but if I'm extracting indices, then 2, 4, and 6 get "doubled" by being at the end of one interval and the beginning of another. Therefore after you divide the interval, you then need to ressemble the interval so that the end of the interval is one integer lower, so 0-1, 2-3, 4-5, and 6-7 in the previous example.
After that just plug those adjusted intervals into the Sub List component and you'll essentially have the result your looking for. In my case, I then had to clean things back up with the path mapper because the result was {a;0;b} when you're really looking for {a;b}
The only glitch in this approach is that the number of items in each sub branch is only not even (branch {1;160} has only 1 item). I guess you could potentially use the list length from the original path structure to match this later on, but I'll have to work a bit more to get that to work.
I attached a file that goes through the process I described above.…
Added by Damien Alomar at 1:46pm on February 18, 2010
hopper and the GH file.
2. There is a drop down menu at the top of Pure Data that reads "Media". Click on "Midi". If your device connection is working, you should see it show up as an option. Set the device to MIDI in. You don't really need to set a MIDI out unless you are planning to send messages back to the device (not sure why you would want to).
3. The boxes labeled "ctlin" with a number are the Control Change in's. In Pure Data go to the "Edit" menu and click on "Edit Mode". Click on one of the "ctlin #" boxes and change the number to match the Control Change number of your physical controller. Mine starts with 5 in the upper right and goes to 65. Each control change number shows up on the display window of my device when I use it which made it easy.
4. Continue this process for all your controls. Delete the unneccesary "ctlin #" boxes by selecting them with a fence and clicking "delete". When you hover over one of the wires you should see and "x". Press the "backspace" key to delete it.
5. Now go down to the "pack f f f ..." box. There should be as many "f" or "floats" in that box as there are you number of controllers. Delete the remaining "f".
6. Next look at the box below that reads "send /0...". Make sure to keep the "/0". If you delete the "/" it will crash Grasshopper. Change the number "5" to match your first control change number. Leave the $numbers alone. You'll want to keep them sequential. Continue change the control change numbers to match all of yours. The $numbers should match the order in which you wired each controller to the "pack f f f..." box.
7. For testing purposes hover over the input on the upper let of the "print" box and connect it to the out of the "send" box. If everything is mapped correctly, working properly, and you go back to the "main" PD window you should see a list of all controllers will a value (0 to 127) next to it. As you turn a knob, the value next to the control change number will increase from 0 to 127. This will give you a good indication of whether or not everything is working and if you mapped it correctly.
8. Click on the "connect OSC" box. You might need to exit out of "edit mode" and back to "performance" mode in the PD canvas.
9. Go To Grasshopper. If everything is working you should see the Panel read "new message" when you turn a knob. At this point it should be pretty obvious how to modify the Grasshopper components. I've tried to keep everything as consistent as possible. Since I filtered out the "/0", the "explode data treat" component starts at 0, the numbers are shifted down by 1.
I just left the IP address, etc. alone on the gHowl UDP component. Just make sure the "port number" matches the OSC port number on the send in Pure Data. If you crash, you may need to choose a new number.
Hope that helps. Let me know if you have any questions. If your computer is not recognizing your midi controller, you may need to install "Midiyoke". I did at first, but it turns out I didn't need it after all.
Best of luck.
…
2. See this? It's a abstract (for the moment) layout of some WIP thing: Imagine a region where "evenly" random points are placed (and then a random zNoise is added) - then a ball-pivot/delauney triangulation is applied ... then ... :
2. I use my method to create "even" points (I suspect that David's is way better/faster/cooler ... but anyway): after a random point is found (inside the region) an additional check is performed: think of the point as a "candidate" that must "pass" a 2nd constrain: if the min distance from all the already found (random) points is smaller than a user defined one > reject and try again (the "try-again" thing [call it: min distance "loops"] is also user controllable). Thus that C# captured attempts to place 122 points but due to (a) the min distance constrain AND (b) the low (about 8 in this case) amount of "try-again" loops it finishes with "only" 59 (not a big deal for this case). The interesting part is that the attempts required are 1573 (~30 times the random points returned). Of course there's a lot of factors affecting this 1573 (variable) thing ... but don't stick to that.
3. So if David uses a "similar" culling method (add some " " more, he he) ... for 80K points ... well we are talking about a BIG number of attempts.
I can provide you with a "no-even" random points C# that (I assume/guess/hope) can speed things a bit (after all: who's gonna notice an "even" random distribution of 80K points within a micro cube?).
best, Peter
…
nded from the centerline at a specified thickness, which may vary along the stent.Two parameters, tmid and tend, control thickness variation
along the segment’s longitudinal direction according to the kinematically admissible Hermitian
curve:
t (d) = tend + t(3d2 − 2d3) 0 ≤ d ≤ 1
t = tmid − tend
where d is the normalized distance along the segment’s
NURBS curve between its endpoint and midpoint. This
form ensures there are no discontinuities in thickness at
the segment midpoint or at the interface of segments in the
overall stent.
2)These normals are then checked and subject to a filleting
procedure to remove re-entrant corners, resulting in
two external sets of boundary coordinates defining the
external edges of the segment’s mid-plane.
3) This plane of nodes is then extruded at a specified angle
(see Section 2.3) to generate a 3-D set of nodes defining
the finite element mesh.
4) These nodes are then mapped to cylindrical coordinates.
5) Finally, 20-node brick elements are generated for finite
element analysis.
I have generated the centerline using 8 control points with degree 7 .
Would be great if anyone can help me with the drawing the normals from the centerline of specified length governed by Hermitian equation,so as to generate the 2D model of a stent (Please refer to the attached figure of a 2D stent and extruded figure) ,using Grasshopper.
The centerline of a single stent segment is representedas a NURBS curve.…
used of 180 being for the northern hemisphere and 0 for the southern hemisphere.For the optimal tilt, to my knowledge, they are mostly based on correcting location's latitude through a single formula.TOF component is more sophisticated. It essentially replicates the Solmetric's Annual Insolation Lookup tool.What it does is that it creates a grid of points. Each point represents the calculated annual insolation on the surface (PV module, SWH collector, facade, any kind of surface) for a single tilt and azimuth angle.Each point is then elevated according to the annual insolation values. The mesh is created from that grid of points. The portion of the mesh which is the highest, represents the optimal tilt and azimuth angles. So the higher your "precision_" input is, the more points in a mesh you'll have - thus the more precise final optimal tilt and azimuth will be.For the diffuse component of the annual incident solar radiation for each point the Perez 1990 modified model is used. Direct is from classical cosine law, and Ground reflected component from Liu and Jordan (1963).So TOF component calculates the optimal tilt and azimuth based on annual incident solar radiation, not AC energy....…
1 JUN to 31 DECBetween hours 1:00 to 24:00Current document units is in MetersConversion to Meters will be applied = 1.000[1 of 7] Writing simulation parameters...Ground temperature data contains monthly average temperatures at 3 different depths .5 meters (1st)2 meters (2nd)4meters (3rd)respectively[2 of 6] No context surfaces...[3 of 6] Writing geometry...[4 of 6] Writing materials and constructions...[5 of 7] Writing schedules...[6 of 7] Writing loads and ideal air system...[7 of 7] Writing outputs......... idf file is successfully written to : c:\ladybug\unnamed\EnergyPlus\unnamed.idf
Analysis is running!...c:\ladybug\unnamed\EnergyPlus\eplusout.csv......
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 8.3.0-6d97d074ea, YMD=2015.05.24 11:32,IDD_Version 8.3.0
** Warning ** IP: Note -- Some missing fields have been filled with defaults. See the audit output file for details.
** Warning ** Version: in IDF="'8.1.0'" not the same as expected="8.3"
************* Beginning Zone Sizing Calculations
** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Some Outward Facing angles of subsurfaces differ significantly from base surface.
** ~~~ ** ...use Output:Diagnostics,DisplayExtraWarnings; to show more details on individual surfaces.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=AW0 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=AW0 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=AW0 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.1101)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=AW0 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.1101)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=AW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.1101)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=AW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=AW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=AW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.1101)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=AW2 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=AW2 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=AW2 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=AW2 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=AW3 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=AW3 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=EW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=EW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=GLZ_0_EW1_1F6383543B434F648813 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=0.9038)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=GLZ_0_EW1_1F6383543B434F648813 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=0.9038)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=GLZ_0_EW1_1F6383543B434F648813 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=16.0967)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=GLZ_0_EW1_1F6383543B434F648813 is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=16.0967)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 6 of back surface=FLOOR is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 7 of back surface=FLOOR is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 8 of back surface=FLOOR is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.1101)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 9 of back surface=FLOOR is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 5 of back surface=CIELING is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 6 of back surface=CIELING is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.1101)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 7 of back surface=CIELING is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 8 of back surface=CIELING is in front of receiving surface=EW0
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=30.0900)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=AW6 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=AW6 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WALLW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=WALLW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WALLW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=WALLW1 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=GLZ_0_WALLW1_103854D39BEF453D8A4E is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=GLZ_0_WALLW1_103854D39BEF453D8A4E is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=GLZ_0_WALLW1_103854D39BEF453D8A4E is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=GLZ_0_WALLW1_103854D39BEF453D8A4E is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=EW0 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=EW0 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=GLZ_0_EW0_6AEDE94222384E5B8950 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=1.4709)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=GLZ_0_EW0_6AEDE94222384E5B8950 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=1.4709)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=GLZ_0_EW0_6AEDE94222384E5B8950 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=15.6696)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=GLZ_0_EW0_6AEDE94222384E5B8950 is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=15.6696)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=FLOOR is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=FLOOR is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=CIELING is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)
** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone="APRATMENT1"
** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=CIELING is in front of receiving surface=EW1
** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=17.0963)
** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.
** Warning ** ManageSizing: For a plant sizing run, there must be at least 1 Sizing:Plant object input. SimulationControl Plant Sizing option ignored.
************* Testing Individual Branch Integrity
************* All Branches passed integrity testing
************* Testing Individual Supply Air Path Integrity
************* All Supply Air Paths passed integrity testing
************* Testing Individual Return Air Path Integrity
************* All Return Air Paths passed integrity testing
************* No node connection errors were found.
************* Beginning Simulation
************* Simulation Error Summary *************
** Warning ** The following Report Variables were requested but not generated
** ~~~ ** because IDF did not contain these elements or misspelled variable name -- check .rdd file
************* Key=*, VarName=ZONE PACKAGED TERMINAL HEAT PUMP TOTAL COOLING ENERGY, Frequency=Hourly
************* Key=*, VarName=ZONE PACKAGED TERMINAL HEAT PUMP TOTAL HEATING ENERGY, Frequency=Hourly
************* Key=*, VarName=CHILLER ELECTRIC ENERGY, Frequency=Hourly
************* Key=*, VarName=BOILER HEATING ENERGY, Frequency=Hourly
************* Key=*, VarName=FAN ELECTRIC ENERGY, Frequency=Hourly
************* Key=*, VarName=ZONE VENTILATION FAN ELECTRIC ENERGY, Frequency=Hourly
************* Key=*, VarName=ZONE VENTILATION TOTAL HEAT LOSS ENERGY, Frequency=Hourly
************* Key=*, VarName=ZONE VENTILATION TOTAL HEAT GAIN ENERGY, Frequency=Hourly
************* There are 1 unused schedules in input.
************* There are 1 unused week schedules in input.
************* There are 3 unused day schedules in input.
************* Use Output:Diagnostics,DisplayUnusedSchedules; to see them.
************* EnergyPlus Warmup Error Summary. During Warmup: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.
************* EnergyPlus Sizing Error Summary. During Sizing: 1 Warning; 49 Severe Errors.
************* EnergyPlus Completed Successfully-- 4 Warning; 49 Severe Errors; Elapsed Time=00hr 00min 4.59sec
Thanks Abraham.I really appreciate it.
Another thing ' I posted a discussion few days ago and got no replies.And this forum is the only 'Hope' for me..Can you quickly check it?thanks.
N
http://www.grasshopper3d.com/group/ladybug/forum/topics/free-form-external-wall-with-glazing-workflow?xg_source=activity
…
onsider:
Identify the aspect of calculations that consumes the most amount of time and resources: Based on what I have understood till now about the parametric workflow within the Grasshopper environment I don’t think it is Rhino/Grasshopper that consumes the maximum amount of time/resources (unless you are handling complex geometry and using native rendering). So, if you could identify the part of your iterations that consumes the maximum amount of resources we can look into parallelizing/optimizing that. It could be something like (RhinoModelling-15%, E+-40%,Radiance-45%)… If there is no way to keep track of that right now in Grasshopper, let me know, I might be able to write a custom script that records the timestamp for each part of the calculation.
Parallelizing Grasshopper: I have no idea of how to do this so I think the best resource/forum would the Grasshopper/Honeybee discussion board. I think at the very least, to make Grasshopper run on remote computers, you’d have to install Rhino/Grasshopper on those computers as well.
Parallelizing EnergyPlus/Radiance: Based on what I understand from reading Mostapha’s source code and also talking to him on this issue, Honeybee typically creates batch files ie radiance or e+ instructions which are then used to run EnergyPlus and Radiance. Radiance runs can be parallelized to a great extent, however, owing to the modular nature of how calculations are setup for grid point calculations , image rendering and some of the new matrix based calculations, there is no single answer to parallelizing Radiance calculations. One can look into optimizing a certain type of calculation and then code instructions for implementing those. E+, which I have only been using for the past month or so, doesn’t seem to have a native way of setting up parallel runs. One can, however, set up multiple separate runs of E+ and direct them to separate processors. I think there was some discussion E+ in the Honeybee forum so you might get a better answer from there on this issue.
Clustering computers and GPU based calculations: One way of implementing the kind of parallelizing that you are referring to, ie. utilizing unused desktops is to cluster computers. Penn State has a dedicated, text-only, Linux-based cluster system which I have been tinkering with for the past year or so. A single node of this cluster has 60 parallel cores and close to 300GB or RAM. Each node, in turn, was created by linking a bunch of computers together. Implementing such a cluster would require an active participation from IT systems admins in your firm. Another option is to use Accelerad for Radiance which parallelizes Radiance . Radiance doesn’t have a limitation regarding the number of cores you could use. I think the 8 processors that you mentioned is more a function of the currently available desktop computer configurations than Radiance’s ability to handle more processors(i7 for example, has 8 processors). In the past, I have run parallel renderings with up to 20 processors. Radiance code is optimized to run on Linux systems so the performance on Windows systems is likely to be somewhat slower.
Finally, unless there is a pre-existing platform to handle such parallel processing, some scripting effort would be required to direct calculation files outwards into different systems/processors and then fetch and consolidate results from those calculations into a single location and then visualize those results on an interface like Mostapha’s Design Explorer.
Sarith…