: Castellano
Horarios
Básico - miércoles
18.30 - 21.30 h
Avanzado - miércoles
15.00 - 18.00 h
Una vez finalizado el curso, el alumno podrá solicitar un diploma acreditativo del mismo.
Normativa: http://daetsam.aq.upm.es/servicios/cursos/informacion
Información cursos: http://daetsam.aq.upm.es/servicios/cursos/primavera2014
Métodos de pago: http://daetsam.aq.upm.es/noticias/2014/02/16/cursos-primavera-2014-aplicaciones-informaticas-e-idiomas
…
Singapore
DESCRIPTION : Two seemingly contrasting ideas combined will turn into something remarkably new. This resulted in the idea of Digital Craftsmanship – connecting the digital technology with artisans’ craftsmanship. Singapore is uniquely positioned to benefit from both – the latest technology in digital fabrication, as well as the beautiful and rich culture of ASEAN craftsmanship in countries like Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam. The NUS digital fabrication in architecture studio introduces advanced design to fabrication flow, such as 3D modeling, simulation, digital fabrication and physical assembly and testing. We discover existence of data flow distinguishes digital and conventional craftsmanship, prolonging the interface between human and object. The result is very encouraging –the Digital Craftsmanship approach could lead innovative yet regionally relevant contemporary architectural design, complex yet controlled functional geometry and aesthetics. We hope this exhibition could raise our awareness about preserving the precious wisdom of traditional craftsmanship alongside with advanced fabrication technologies in architecture.
OPENING : 24 August 2012, 7pm – 9pm, RSVP to Yi Hui (dfabstudio@gmail.com) EXHIBITION : 25 – 28 August 2012 (10 am – 9 pm, daily, free admission) VENUE : Promenade, Level 8, National Library Building, 100 Victoria Street, Singapore
PROJECT TEAM : Shinya Okuda (Studio Tutor), Liane Ee Rulian, Hiral Ashvin Desai, Lee Teng Teng Cheryl, Ian Wong Hengjie, Teo Lin Lin, Xu Xiaoqi, Liu Zhichao, Diptarshi Dev, Tan Zi Hua, Teh Yi Hui, Joshua Loh.
Organized by Digital Fabrication in Architecture Studio, NUS.…
arq, que se celebrará entre el 28 de Enero y el 1 de Febrero de 2013 en el Colegio de Arquitectos de Granada.
El taller está destinado a arquitectos, artistas y diseñadores, tanto como profesionales, como estudiantes de grado y posgrado, que, sin necesidad de haber tenido ningún contacto previo con entornos de programación o herramientas informáticas de dibujo paramétrico o generativo, están interesados en probar y experimentar con las opciones que nos pueden ofrecer a los diseñadores.
El taller está dividido en tres bloques:
Curso intensivo: del 28 de Enero al 30 de Febrero, en horario de mañana, de 10 a 14. Taller de proyectos: del 28 de Enero al 30 de Febrero, por la tarde, de 16 a 20; y el 31 de Febrero, durante todo el día.
Presentaciones: viernes 1 de Febrero, mañana y tarde.
Utilizaremos Grasshopper, el editor algorítmico asociado al software de modelado tridimensional y dibujo Rhinoceros, por su facilidad de aprendizaje, al tratarse de un entorno gráfico, facilidad de adquisición, al ser gratuito y haber disponible una versión de prueba de Rhinoceros también gratuita, y amplia difusión en los últimos años. Y lo emplearemos tanto como modelador, como conector entre otros softwares y varias disciplinas. Por este motivo, también utilizaremos algunos de sus plug-ins, como Geco, para análisis ambiental, Elk, para enlazarlo con OpenStreetMap o Kangaroo, para simulación de sistemas físicos.
Lo único que necesitas es un ordenador portátil (si no pudieras conseguir), hacer el ingreso con el importe correspondiente y mandarnos tus datos y el recibo bancario del ingreso a smartlabgranada@gmail.com. Puedes ver los detalles en el apartado de Inscripción. El resto del material, tanto software como hardware, lo ponemos nosotros.
Nuestro acercamiento a estas herramientas es entusiasta acerca del potencial creativo que pueden ofrecer a diseñadores y artistas, pero también crítico y especulativo. Nos alejamos tanto de una posición puramente formalista, como del estricto funcionalismo, a los que desde los últimos años frecuentemente se ha asociado a esta disciplina.…
Added by Miguel Vidal at 8:42am on January 19, 2013
oo culm and the web is mad of bamboo slats connected to the culms on either side of the attachment points. To make things clearer (extracted from the above paper):
The authors of the paper did a numerical beam-model in ANSYS to see if they could replicate their theoretical results, and it is fairly correct (some differences due to the non-linear behavior of the semi-ring joints that they use, they remain of an order of 5-10% difference in maximum deflection).
My problem is that I am not able to obtain the same deflection values that the authors did (11.4 mm for a total service load of 7.063 kN applied punctually on the upper chord where the truss elements meet, or even replicate the load/deflection curve). Using an orthotropic material, with the engineering constants taken from (ResearchGate - A bamboo Beam-Column Connection Capable to Transmit Moment), my model is too flexible and I get a maximum deflection of 24.28 mm. I tried other orthotropic mechanical characterizations from other sources (Kathry & Mishra, 2012, Finite element analysis of bamboo and joints using steel members under various loading conditions for design study and Chand , Shukla & Sharma, 2008, Analysis of Mechanical Behaviour of Bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus) by Using FEM), to no avail.
Of course, the problem could be with the material properties I inputted but I am trying to contact the research team to see directly with them. In the meantime, I am looking to make sure the model itself is not flawed.
It also seems to me that gravity was not accounted for in the numerical of the paper, but it seemed to much of an oversight to be possible (still, the deflection curve of their paper goes through 0).
There are several points I am not quite sure about: after all I am still fairly new to Karamba3D and may still have some things to learn about the inner mechanics of the plugin.
The very first is: should I put eccentricities of the slat-elements of the truss in the definition of their cross-section (directly with the Cross Section box) or as an offset of the beam element (with the ModifyElem box)? I tried both approaches and they seem to yield similar results (max. deflection change by 0.65mm in my latest model).
Second is: is it good practice to subdivide the beam elements in more than one element (and connecting the pieces rigidly) in order to get better results? I imagine some meshing or subdivision is performed when the analysis is run but there is no way of visualizing it (that I found in any case). Subdividing the chord elements seems to give smoother deformation results (though I did not check stress I have to admit). My issue on this topic is that the subdivision of the slat-elements of the web is problematic. On the screenshot below, where the elements are divided in two, lets take the example of node 18. It seems to me that all elements of the diagonal element (28, 29, 34 & 35) are all rigidly connected to the node 18. 28 & 29 are not connected together, independently from 34 & 35. The added rigidity may not be a bad thing for my model, but it is not correct I think? Is there a way of solving the problem?
Element tags:
Node tags:
And here is my GH file (clean enough hopefully): verification-model-V04.gh
Thank you all in advance for any insight (even on the inner logics of Karamba)!
…
one" which is an indicator of which ones are considered to exist in more than one zone. (i added a list item) to the internalized data so you can see them. So you can use this to KNOW exactly which 28 lots actually need to be analyzed against the "zoning boundaries", and which are considered to be completely contained.
The trick here (and what I do not know how to do). Is to perform an operation on ONLY the lots that have the "Y" flag in the "Split Zone".
Essentially what i need to do is to calculate the PROPORTION of the LOT that exists in each of the ZONES, but the tree/list needs to stay in order because i have to match those proportions back up at a later point.
You've already done so much already, but if you could take a look and maybe even get me started (like. How do i perform an operation ONLY on geometry that has the "Y" indicator?) that would be super helpful.
Thanks!
EG …
Added by Eric Galipo at 3:03pm on January 15, 2016
somthin like this
Then I can with some correlation say that If I am in x=442.81 than x=1.7 and y=should be 28...but the Image Sampler dont schow me Where I am located..
in the second case
I need just to know wich color and where I am picking than with some command I can say if I get RGB(254,183,5) correspont to a value from -24 ...
thanks for your help David…
points that are just opposite of each other on each panel), while also getting rid of the points that are on the outer edges of the structure, how would I go about and do that?Would the best way be to use the "ClosestPoint" component, or is there a smarter way to build a definition that automatically pairs the needed points?Basically, I need to create a vector between the pair of points, so that I can begin working with connecting geometry.
I've attached Rhino file and Grasshopper definition.Any ideas or comments is much appreciated! I hope someone can help me out.Thanks,Claus …
planes created on each node to intersect each Brep (The planes are more than the Brep, so some planes might not intersect the Breps). The outcome for "Brep | Brep" does NOT give me 408 branches. It just gives me 3716 curves in 11,425 branches. I Basically want those outcome curves to be organize with their original surfaces so I can unroll them easily and associate them with their original surfaces for fabrication. But the outcome tree comes out a mess.I tried partition list. I tried to intersect the out-curves with the original Breps again in another step but nothing seems to work for me. I would really appreciate any help I can get. Thank you…
aph relaxation in 3D and more). There is much more already in our GitHub repos and more to be added. For getting an idea of our future direction check this lecture out. For getting a better understanding of graphs and graph theory watch this lecture and this lecture on a gamified spatial configuration process. Stay tuned for more and do not hesitate to post Python questions in the meantime.
ps. If you are having installation problems, please check the remedy suggested below:
Comment by Iman Sheikhansari on August 26, 2019 at 8:33amDelete Comment
HiIf you are encountering a problem with rhino 6 versions don't worryFollow these steps.1. Download SYNTACTIC from https://sites.google.com/site/pirouznourian/syntactic-design2. Install it and go to the installation folder, Drag & drop SYNTACTIC(green one) over your grasshopper canvas.3. Close your rhino and reopen it. 4. Type GrasshopperDeveloperSettings5. Tick the Memory load *.GHA assemblies using COFF byte arrays option6. Run grasshopper and enjoy plugin
…