t 2^15 are being listed. Later I will use this info to cull;
all instances where important nodes are not present,
geometric unstable trusses using Grubler's criterion,
the remainder will go to FEM for further analysis,
I can use this method but i require to separate each binary boolean
so they are stored separately like so;
{0} (0) 0 (1) 0 (2) 0 (3) 0 (4) 0 . . . . . . . . (15) 0
{1} (0) 1 (1) 0 (2) 0 (3) 0 (4) 0 . . . . . . . . (15) 0
{2} (0) 0 (1) 1 (2) 0 (3) 0 (4) 0 . . . . . . . . (15) 0 (I know there must be an easier scripted way how to do it) or else is there a way to decompose them directly from the method you sent me using standard Grasshopper components?. Any method would work.
Best,
Kane…
NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS". I'm not sure of where to start in troubleshooting this. I've attached the file.
Thank you,
See the errors and warnings below:
{0;0;0}
0. Current document units is in Meters
1. Conversion to Meters will be applied = 1.000
2. [1 of 8] Writing simulation parameters...
3. [2 of 8] Writing context surfaces...
4. [2 of 8] Writing context surfaces...
5. [3 of 8] Writing geometry...
6. [4 of 8] Writing Electric Load Center - Generator specifications ...
7. [5 of 8] Writing materials and constructions...
8. [6 of 8] Writing schedules...
9. [7 of 8] Writing loads and ideal air system...
10. [8 of 8] Writing outputs...
11. ...
... idf file is successfully written to : R:\Green\SuRG\Building_Performance_Analysis\2016_analysis_studies\Energy_Analysis_Comparison\Honeybee_+_Ladybug\tutorial01\EnergyPlus\tutorial01.idf
12.
13. Analysis is running!...
14. ...
...
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
15.
16. Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 8.5.0-c87e61b44b, YMD=2016.10.31 11:39,IDD_Version 8.5.0
17.
18. ************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:
19.
20. ************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...
21.
22. ************* 24 Sizing:Parameters,
23.
24. ************* Only last 1 lines before error line shown.....
25.
26. ************* 25 None, !- Heating Sizing Factor
27.
28. ** Severe ** IP: IDF line~25 Invalid Number in Numeric Field#1 (Heating Sizing Factor), value=NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS
29.
30. ** Warning ** IP: Note -- Some missing fields have been filled with defaults. See the audit output file for details.
31.
32. ** ~~~ ** Possible Invalid Numerics or other problems
33.
34. ** Fatal ** IP: Errors occurred on processing IDF file. Preceding condition(s) cause termination.
35.
36. ...Summary of Errors that led to program termination:
37.
38. ..... Reference severe error count=1
39.
40. ..... Last severe error=IP: IDF line~
, value=NONE, in SIZING:PARAMETERS
41.
42. ************* Warning: Node connection errors not checked - most system input has not been read (see previous warning).
43.
44. ************* Fatal error -- final processing. Program exited before simulations began. See previous error messages.
45.
46. ************* EnergyPlus Warmup Error Summary. During Warmup: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.
47.
48. ************* EnergyPlus Sizing Error Summary. During Sizing: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.
49.
50. ************* EnergyPlus Terminated--Fatal Error Detected. 1 Warning; 1 Severe Errors; Elapsed Time=00hr 00min 9.34sec
51.…
3} N=2
....
{527} N=4
What I want to do is figure out the same the item in group A and retrieve their branch index so that I can get the corresponding item in group A. Is there any way to make it?…
0, 5, 10, 15, 20
1, 6, 11, 16, 21
2, 7, 12, 17, 22
3, 8, 13, 18, 23
4, 9, 14, 19, 24
and if i'm here is because i'm not able... :)
can you help me?
thank you
…
ow do you sort data trees with distinctive number of list items in each branch?
In this example, there are 161 branches with three distinctive number of list items, 3, 4, and 5. I want to know if there is another way to sort out this data tree into this way: 3 vertices {0;0}, {0;1}, {0;2],...4 vertices {1;0}, {1;1}, {1;2},... 5 vertices {2;0}, {2;1}, {2;2},...
2. Is there a way to sort our surfaces based on number of distinctive list items automatically? For example, if there are surfaces with 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 vertices, I want to make five branches with the same number of vertices automatically.
I hope my questions make sense...
Thank you!
Dongyeop …
Added by Dongyeop Lee at 12:14pm on October 3, 2016
53 → 53 → 63 → 74 → 74 → 84 → 9
As you can see from the above list the connection sequence comes in waves of three, where each group of similar indices on the left is associated with a group of three incrementing indices on the right.
Some combination of Series components will probably generate this list, but it'll only work for the first ring, the second one will need a different connection pattern. It is perhaps better to just encode the integer pairs by hand. But then you cannot change your mind about the number of sides later.…
Added by David Rutten at 10:39am on October 21, 2015
s {0} with 0/1/2 and the values 1/1/1
{1} with 0/1/2 and the values 2/2/2
{2} with 0/1/2 and the values 3/3/3
Second data set contains 3 items {0} with 0/1/2 and the values A/A/A
{1} with 0/1/2 and the values B/B/B
{2} with 0/1/2 and the values C/C/C
After merging the 2 data sets i need as result one data set with 6 items {0} with 0/1/2 and the values 1/1/1
{1} with 0/1/2 and the values 2/2/2
{2} with 0/1/2 and the values 3/3/3
{3} with 0/1/2 and the values A/A/A
{4} with 0/1/2 and the values B/B/B
{5} with 0/1/2 and the values C/C/C
How can i realise this?…