Search Results - 双色球和值尾数是8和9的数『1TBH·COM』全球通彩票代理注册2023年3月19日7时59分41秒.H5c2a3.ivhduifoj

Comment on: Topic 'DWG,DXF or 3DM to PLT and HPGL'

own use and added the command line port LPT1 port dump. I found a couple of strange things in your code: # Changes the model units to inches, but does not scale model.rs.UnitSystem(unit_system=8, scale=False) Why did you change the model units here? HPGL units are 40 per mm (which is also 1016 per inch) staying in mm units in your model will be fine if your step scaling in right. And doing this seems strange for a cutting program: allCurves = rs.ObjectsByType(4)for curve in allCurves: if (rs.CurveDegree(curve) == 2 or rs.CurveDegree(curve) == 3) and rs.IsPolyCurve(curve): rs.ExplodeCurves(curve, True)allCurves = rs.ObjectsByType(4) Cutting usually needs a closed curve to produce a nice clean removable piece from the material. Your approach results in a bunch of line/curve segments instead of closed polycurves/polylines. As this simulation shows the 'O's and 'R' are cut as a collection of curve segments - not closed polycurves: I just removed this step from the code. As this simulation shows every part of the font is cut in one cut action - exactly what I needed: I saw your RVB code on the RhinoScript site too - was way more detailed than I needed - my vinyl cutter only has one 'pen' - the cutting blade. I just needed a really basic way of getting polycurves into HPGL format and firing it out to a printer port. Thanks for your help on this little project - I'm very stoked at the result! Let me know if I can help with your cutter project. Cheers DK…

Added by David Kay at 9:27am on October 25, 2017

Topic: 3D FingerPrint - need to extract ridges and valleys?? Principal Curvatures Estimation

t file** - ply file with just x,y,z locations. I got it from a 3d scanner. Here is how first few lines of file looks like - ply format ascii 1.0 comment VCGLIB generated element vertex 6183 property float x property float y property float z end_header -32.3271 -43.9859 11.5124 -32.0631 -43.983 11.4945 12.9266 -44.4913 28.2031 13.1701 -44.4918 28.2568 13.4138 -44.4892 28.2531 13.6581 -44.4834 28.1941 13.9012 -44.4851 28.2684 ... ... ... In case you need the data - please email me on **nisha.m234@gmail.com**. **Algorithm:** I am trying to find principal curvatures for extracting the ridges and valleys. The steps I am following is: 1. Take a point x 2. Find its k nearest neighbors. I used k from 3 to 20. 3. average the k nearest neighbors => gives (_x, _y, _z) 4. compute covariance matrix 5. Now I take eigen values and eigen vectors of this covariance matrix 6. I get u, v and n here from eigen vectors. u is a vector corresponding to largest eigen value v corresponding to 2nd largest n is 3rd smallest vector corresponding to smallest eigen value 7. Then for transforming the point(x,y,z) I compute matrix T T = [ui ] [u ] [x - _x] [vi ] = [v ] x [y - _y] [ni ] [n ] [z - _z] 8. for each i of the k nearest neighbors: [ n1 ] [u1*u1 u1*v1 v1*v1] [ a ] [ n2 ] = [u2*u2 u2*v2 v2*v2] [ b ] [... ] [ ... ... ... ] [ c ] [ nk ] [uk*uk uk*vk vk*vk] Solve this for a, b and c with least squares 9. this equations will give me a,b,c 10. now I compute eigen values of matrix [a b b a ] 11. This will give me 2 eigen values. one is Kmin and another Kmax. **My Problem:** The output is no where close to finding the correct Ridges and Valleys. I am totally Stuck and frustrated. I am not sure where exactly I am getting it wrong. I think the normal's are not computed correctly. But I am not sure. I am very new to graphics programming and so this maths, normals, shaders go way above my head. Any help will be appreciated. **PLEASE PLEASE HELP!!** **Resources:** I am using Visual Studio 2010 + Eigen Library + ANN Library. **Other Options used** I tried using MeshLab. I used ball pivoting triangles remeshing in MeshLab and then applied the polkadot3d shader. If correctly identifies the ridges and valleys. But I am not able to code it. **My Function:** //the function outputs to ply file void getEigen() { int nPts; // actual number of data points ANNpointArray dataPts; // data points ANNpoint queryPt; // query point ANNidxArray nnIdx;// near neighbor indices ANNdistArray dists; // near neighbor distances ANNkd_tree* kdTree; // search structure //for k = 25 and esp = 2, seems to got few ridges queryPt = annAllocPt(dim); // allocate query point dataPts = annAllocPts(maxPts, dim); // allocate data points nnIdx = new ANNidx[k]; // allocate near neigh indices dists = new ANNdist[k]; // allocate near neighbor dists nPts = 0; // read data points ifstream dataStream; dataStream.open(inputFile, ios::in);// open data file dataIn = &dataStream; ifstream queryStream; queryStream.open("input/query. pts", ios::in);// open data file queryIn = &queryStream; while (nPts < maxPts && readPt(*dataIn, dataPts[nPts])) nPts++; kdTree = new ANNkd_tree( // build search structure dataPts, // the data points nPts, // number of points dim); // dimension of space while (readPt(*queryIn, queryPt)) // read query points { kdTree->annkSearch( // search queryPt, // query point k, // number of near neighbors nnIdx, // nearest neighbors (returned) dists, // distance (returned) eps); // error bound double x = queryPt[0]; double y = queryPt[1]; double z = queryPt[2]; double _x = 0.0; double _y = 0.0; double _z = 0.0; #pragma region Compute covariance matrix for (int i = 0; i < k; i++) { _x += dataPts[nnIdx[i]][0]; _y += dataPts[nnIdx[i]][1]; _z += dataPts[nnIdx[i]][2]; } _x = _x/k; _y = _y/k; _z = _z/k; double A[3][3] = {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}; for (int i = 0; i < k; i++) { double X = dataPts[nnIdx[i]][0]; double Y = dataPts[nnIdx[i]][1]; double Z = dataPts[nnIdx[i]][2]; A[0][0] += (X-_x) * (X-_x); A[0][1] += (X-_x) * (Y-_y); A[0][2] += (X-_x) * (Z-_z); A[1][0] += (Y-_y) * (X-_x); A[1][1] += (Y-_y) * (Y-_y); A[1][2] += (Y-_y) * (Z-_z); A[2][0] += (Z-_z) * (X-_x); A[2][1] += (Z-_z) * (Y-_y); A[2][2] += (Z-_z) * (Z-_z); } MatrixXd C(3,3); C <<A[0][0]/k, A[0][1]/k, A[0][2]/k, A[1][0]/k, A[1][1]/k, A[1][2]/k, A[2][0]/k, A[2][1]/k, A[2][2]/k; #pragma endregion EigenSolver<MatrixXd> es(C); MatrixXd Eval = es.eigenvalues().real().asDiagonal(); MatrixXd Evec = es.eigenvectors().real(); MatrixXd u,v,n; double a = Eval.row(0).col(0).value(); double b = Eval.row(1).col(1).value(); double c = Eval.row(2).col(2).value(); #pragma region SET U V N if(a>b && a>c) { u = Evec.row(0); if(b>c) { v = Eval.row(1); n = Eval.row(2);} else { v = Eval.row(2); n = Eval.row(1);} } else if(b>a && b>c) { u = Evec.row(1); if(a>c) { v = Eval.row(0); n = Eval.row(2);} else { v = Eval.row(2); n = Eval.row(0);} } else { u = Eval.row(2); if(a>b) { v = Eval.row(0); n = Eval.row(1);} else { v = Eval.row(1); n = Eval.row(0);} } #pragma endregion MatrixXd O(3,3); O <<u, v, n; MatrixXd UV(k,3); VectorXd N(k,1); for( int i=0; i<k; i++) { double x = dataPts[nnIdx[i]][0];; double y = dataPts[nnIdx[i]][1];; double z = dataPts[nnIdx[i]][2];; MatrixXd X(3,1); X << x-_x, y-_y, z-_z; MatrixXd T = O * X; double ui = T.row(0).col(0).value(); double vi = T.row(1).col(0).value(); double ni = T.row(2).col(0).value(); UV.row(i) << ui * ui, ui * vi, vi * vi; N.row(i) << ni; } Vector3d S = UV.colPivHouseholderQr().solve(N); MatrixXd II(2,2); II << S.row(0).value(), S.row(1).value(), S.row(1).value(), S.row(2).value(); EigenSolver<MatrixXd> es2(II); MatrixXd Eval2 = es2.eigenvalues().real().asDiagonal(); MatrixXd Evec2 = es2.eigenvectors().real(); double kmin, kmax; if(Eval2.row(0).col(0).value() < Eval2.row(1).col(1).value()) { kmin = Eval2.row(0).col(0).value(); kmax = Eval2.row(1).col(1).value(); } else { kmax = Eval2.row(0).col(0).value(); kmin = Eval2.row(1).col(1).value(); } double thresh = 0.0020078; if (kmin < thresh && kmax > thresh ) cout << x << " " << y << " " << z << " " << 255 << " " << 0 << " " << 0 << endl; else cout << x << " " << y << " " << z << " " << 255 << " " << 255 << " " << 255 << endl; } delete [] nnIdx; delete [] dists; delete kdTree; annClose(); } Thanks, NISHA…

Added by Nisha M at 10:30am on June 20, 2011

Topic: SnappyHexMesh crashed when meshing 9 buildings

,with OpenfoamV1612+ in Windows 10 64bit.The blockmesh worked good.And the snappyhexmesh crashed in the process.My computer memory is not enough? Or some settings wrong?Could you help me solve this question?/---------------------------------------------------------------------------| ========= | || \ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox || \ / O peration | Version: v1612+ || \ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com || \/ M anipulation | |*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/Build : v1612+Exec : snappyHexMeshDate : Aug 27 2017Time : 09:39:54Host : "default"PID : 13443Case : /home/ofuser/workingDir/butterfly/outdoor_airflownProcs : 1sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE).fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 10)allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //Create time Create mesh for time = 0 Read mesh in = 2.14 s Overall mesh bounding box : (-241.5472 -241.4418 0) (496.4376 536.2438 144.8633)Relative tolerance : 1e-06Absolute matching distance : 0.001081851 Reading refinement surfaces.Read refinement surfaces in = 0.01 s Reading refinement shells.Refinement level 3 for all cells inside around_buildings_area.stlRead refinement shells in = 0 s Setting refinement level of surface to be consistent with shells.For geometry outdoor_airflow.stl detected 0 uncached triangles out of 120Checked shell refinement in = 0 s Reading features.Read features in = 0 s Determining initial surface intersections Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 1684728Number of edges to retest : 1684728Number of intersected edges : 5583Calculated surface intersections in = 1.68 s Initial mesh : cells:554112 faces:1684728 points:576779Cells per refinement level:0 554112 Adding patches for surface regions Patch Type Region outdoor_airflow: 6 wall buildings Added patches in = 0.03 s Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 1684728Number of edges to retest : 0Number of intersected edges : 5583Selecting decompositionMethod none Refinement phase Found point (127.4452 147.401 72.43167) in cell 402042 on processor 0 Surface refinement iteration 0 Marked for refinement due to surface intersection : 8820 cells.Determined cells to refine in = 3.87 sSelected for refinement : 8820 cells (out of 554112)Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 1883850Number of edges to retest : 250376Number of intersected edges : 21198Refined mesh in = 1.77 sAfter refinement surface refinement iteration 0 : cells:615852 faces:1883850 points:652499Cells per refinement level:0 5452921 70560 Surface refinement iteration 1 Marked for refinement due to surface intersection : 38502 cells.Determined cells to refine in = 0.04 sSelected for refinement : 40392 cells (out of 615852)Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 2787132Number of edges to retest : 1118049Number of intersected edges : 85655Refined mesh in = 3.17 sAfter refinement surface refinement iteration 1 : cells:898596 faces:2787132 points:990317Cells per refinement level:0 5432351 486812 306680 Surface refinement iteration 2 Marked for refinement due to surface intersection : 159213 cells.Determined cells to refine in = 0.1 sSelected for refinement : 168471 cells (out of 898596)Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 6576117Number of edges to retest : 4737635Rhino Model and GH files is in t'he zip file.Please help me solve this question!~~…

Added by Minggang Yin to Ladybug Tools at 7:29pm on August 29, 2017

Topic: TUTORIAL: Loft between three circles on a Crv

the following image of a hut. I do not have experience using kangaroo to simulate forces, but I have made a test using multiple random components on a flat surface to fake the effect I'm going for. See image below. The main issue I'm having is that the original file used for my test surface used box morph and the variable pipe command. Box morph is a bit touchy on a curved surface and it is not as elegant as I would like it to be (ie. I want all the hair diameters to be perfectly circular and uniform in size). Variable pipe also does not align the base of the hair with the existing surface, which means I have to offset the surface and then trim the excess of my pipe.....leading to heavy code and the file crashing. So I'm trying to rebuild the "hairs" using a new method: 1) Subdivide the surface 2) Find the midpoint of each surface and then create a straight line that is perpendicular 3) Move a point along the on the straight line (between the start and end points) in the z direction, and then create a nurbs curve using this point and the start and end points 4) create a circle at the base of each crv, and then two more circles: one at the point in the middle point (I think I set it to .9) and the end of the curve 5) The problem: Now I am trying to sweep along these three circles and the nurbs curve to create a bent hair/pipe that is flush with the conic surface, but it does not work. If someone can help that would be amazing. I've included my original surface test file and my new file where I am rebuilding using the sweep command. Below is a drawing of what I'm trying to achieve. …

Added by bobbi bortolussi at 3:26pm on March 16, 2017

Event: INTRODUCTION TO PARAMETRIC DESIGN [IPD]

s, the participants will focus on the key advantages of Grasshopper’s capabilities through a range of design challenges in order to aid designers in both their drafting tasks and modelling capabilities. The workshop covers many concepts such as Object Attributes/Parameters, Data Types, Data Structures, and Designing with Algorithms. Specifically, this course will focus on understanding both Lists and Data Trees, as well as the best practices for integrating Grasshopper into your Professional Design Workflow. The workshop offers guided curriculum and continuous support, based on in-depth and professional learning experiences. Workshop outcomes:Teach the participants how to:- + be proficient in parametric logics learning the key benefits of parametric techniques in architecture design workflow (when to use it & how to use it)+ Correctly communicate with different 3D and BIM packages in order to keep the geometry clean and light while preserving all NURBS information.+ Develop architecture design based on mathematical equations to create non-standard free form building skin.+ Create a pattern that changes dynamically based on specific inputs which can be applied over the building façade, interior walls or ceiling or even floor pattern.+ Automate and Optimize design variables to achieve the optimum solution for the design problem. Program Outline: DAY 1:-Introduction to Parametric Design -Introduction to Grasshopper & Rhino (technical tools). DAY 2:-Exploring the parametric workflow. -Setup the design algorithm & generating a list of data. DAY 3:-Introducing the new ways of generating parametric curves and surfaces.-Parametric form generation in-dept DAY 4:-Introducing Data Tree logic and parametric transformations.-Creating Associative techniques – Attractors (points, curves and vectors). DAY 5:-Working with advanced form generation with dynamic pattern.-Parametric optimization based on environmental analysis -featuring the Performance-Driven Design possibilities DURATION:6 – 8 hours per day [50 - 60 hours Total]Every Saturday [9.00 Am : 1.00 Pm & 2.30 Pm : 6.00 Pm] PREREQUISITES:No need of any specific knowledge of Rhinoceros or Grasshopper. REGISTRATION:In order to register, you will need to fill the Registration Form .https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1PckdW1hrWs9fJAHWBZlVsuhH8K0PfDuMWIpXHT_4FYw/viewform REGISTRATION DEADLINE:23th October 2014.…

Added by ayman wagdy at 7:48am on October 19, 2014

Event: rat[LAB] Computational Design Tour INDIA // Filling The Void

hops, design sessions & symposia across 5 cities in India. We encourage all architecture & design students and professionals to join us in this novel experimentation event and aid in 'Filling The Void'; Void in Architecture, Void in our Cities, Void in Education. REGISTRATIONS ARE OPEN NOW. rat[LAB] Computational Design Tour - INDIA Agenda // Filling The Void 1 country // 5 cities // 1 agenda // 100+ students // 25+ professionals // 5 exhibitions // 1 publication Void is typically defined as null, invalid, empty or redundant and has a psychological perception of a ‘negative’. Through years of development in India, there has been an organic urban growth and inorganic architectural growth which has led to formation of voids in a physical and a metaphorical sense. There also exist voids as gaps between architecture, cities, education and technology. ‘Filling The Void’ looks at void as an opportunity, potential and a driver of change for architecture & design education in India. // Cities & Dates* Mumbai – 22nd June to 24th June 2015 (Monday to Wednesday) Chennai - 29th June to 1st July 2015 (Monday to Wednesday) Bengaluru – 3rd July to 5th July 2015 (Friday to Sunday) Chandigarh - 16th July to 18th July 2015 (Thursday to Saturday) New Delhi – 6th August to 8th August 2015 (Thursday to Saturday) *Venue details are published on rat[LAB] website. // Registration Dates // Early-bird Registrations Open: 08 May 2015 // EXTENDED Early-bird registrations End: 05 June 2015 // General Registrations End: 15 June 2015 (Or till seats last) …

Added by rat[LAB] EDUCATION at 12:38pm on May 15, 2015

Comment on: Topic 'Unconditioned, Addaptive Comfort set temperature'

that both the ASHRAE and European Adaptive models were derived from surveys of awake occupants. While the topic has not been investigated as well as it should be, the few adaptive-style surveys of sleeping occupants that have been conducted show that people tend to desire significantly cooler temperatures when they are sleeping as opposed to when they are awake. Notably, Chapter 8 of Humphrey's recently-published book on Adaptive Comfort (https://books.google.com/books?id=lOZzCgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Adaptive+Thermal+Comfort+Foundations+and+analysis&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6npqSi__KAhUJMj4KHf7SCXMQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=Adaptive%20Thermal%20Comfort%20Foundations%20and%20analysis&f=false) provides some interesting insights into this. In a 1973 survey, Humphreys found that the quality of sleep started to deteriorate at temperatures above 24-26C regardless of the time of year and that there was no clearly-determinable lower limit to comfortable sleeping temperatures (in other words, people were fine at 12C if they were given enough blankets). He surveyed only British occupants who were sleeping in traditional beds with mattresses and a wide range of blankets. This is important because the nature of the findings is such that the comfort temperatures would be very different if the survey participants had been sleeping in a hammock or in closer contact with the ground (both popular practices for a number of cultures living in warmer climates). Traditional mattresses cut the ability to radiate body heat in half as compared to a standing human body and I would venture a guess that this is a big reason why much cooler temperatures are desired while sleeping on mattresses as opposed to standing awake/uptight. So for your case, if you want to account for a time of the day that occupants are sleeping on mattresses, I would change the comfort temperature for this these hours down to 24C. Otherwise, if you are trying to show the comfortable hours of awake people in your space, your current 100% comfortable nighttime hours are a better estimate. I have also noticed that nighttime temperatures become comfortable in extreme weeks of hot/dry climates. This is what is happening in this extreme week simulation of Los Angeles' San Fernando Valley here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJz1Eojph8E&index=3&list=PLruLh1AdY-Sj3ehUTSfKa1IHPSiuJU52A I will put in the ability to set custom values for comfort temperatures into the Adaptive Comfort Recipe soon so that you can test out a 'sleeping comfort temperature' if you would like. I have created a github issue for it here: https://github.com/mostaphaRoudsari/Honeybee/issues/486 I was not so convinced by Nicol's argument about humidity on those pages as I was when I saw the correlations of both operative temperature and effective temperature to surveyed comfort votes in real buildings. Humphreys shows these correlations on page 106 of the book I linked to above. Notably, the correlation of Effective Temperature to comfort votes (0.257) is slightly worse than the correlation of just Operative Temperature (0.265). In other words, trying to account for humidity actually weakened the predictive power of the metric. This difference in correlation is not so great as for me to discount an Adaptive comfort model based on Effective temperature (as deDear once proposed). However, the correlations of PMV (0.213) and SET (0.185) to comfort votes are so poor that I now use the PMV model only with great caution. This reason for the decreased importance of humidity may be multi-faceted, whether it's Nicol's explanation or another. Still, the data suggests that we are probably better off ignoring humidity when forecasting comfort and should only consider it when evaluating conditions of extreme heat stress where people's primary loss of heat is through sweating. -Chris…

Added by Chris Mackey to Ladybug Tools at 9:01am on February 17, 2016

Event: Light Design Workshop

en la práctica de nuevos métodos de diseño y fabricación utilizando herramientas digitales. Estos procedimientos emergentes están cambiando radicalmente la manera en que nos aproximamos al proceso de diseño en términos de concepción y producción. Los participantes serán introducidos en el uso de softwares de modelado 2d y 3d para la generación de geometrías que serán posteriormente mecanizadas in situ en una máquina de control numérico CNC de 3 ejes. ¡AL FINAL DEL CURSO TE LLEVAS TU LÁMPARA A CASA! Profesores: Equipo MEDIODESIGN* + TOOLINGROUP* *Official Rhino Trainners. Acreditación otorgada por McNeel, desarrolladores del software Rhinoceros. Lugar: Mediodesign. Pallars 85-91 5-2 BCN Duración: 16 / 20 horas Fecha: sábado 9 / domingo 10 julio de 2011 Horario: de 10h a 14h / de 16h a 20h Plazas: 20 participantes REQUISITOS < Dirigido a estudiantes y profesionales de la arquitectura, diseño y profesiones afines. < Ordenador portátil. < Softwares instalados. En el momento de la inscripción, los participantes recibirán las instrucciones para la descarga e instalación de versiones gratuitas (trials) de los softwares. CONTENIDOS < Introducción al diseño avanzado y la fabricación digital. < Entorno Rhinoceros y sus plug-ins. < Herramientas y estrategias de trabajo CNC. < Materiales y sus características. < Planteamiento del ejercicio: diseño de una luminaria < Desarrollo del archivo de RhinoCam para el mecanizado CNC. < Mecanizado y post-producción. < Entrega de propuestas: Presentación en formato digital del proceso de diseño y fabricación (pdf, powerpoint, etc…) y del prototipo de luminaria realizado. INSCRIPCIONES Precio: 199 € Materiales incluidos. Forma de pago: mediante transferencia bancaria. Límite fecha de inscripción: lunes 4 de julio 2011 Se otorgará certificado de asistencia. …

Added by Affonso Orciuoli at 4:57am on June 21, 2011

Blog Post: YANG : Yet Antother Node Generator

After some rework of a previous script (…

Added by Laurent DELRIEU at 2:56pm on December 9, 2015

Event: Taller de Arquitectura MAYA (Grasshopper & V-Ray applications)

hopper) and High Definition visualizations (V-Ray) and exploring its scientific innovations supporting the users' platform philosophical ideas. SESSIONS: 5 sessions of 8 hours (40 hours total) E-MAIL: educacion@chconsultores.net REGISTRATION: (55) 56 62 57 93 TECHNICAL INFO: 044 (55) 31 22 71 83 INSTRUCTORS: Have past experience working at Gehry Technologies, and participated at studios with Eric Owen Moss and Tom Wiscombe at SCI-Arc (Southern California Institute of Architecture). Day 1: Introduction to MAYA tools, 3D exercise start. Day 2: Continue 3D exercise. Day 3: Original 3D architecture design. Day 4: Grasshopper optional application on 3D architecture design. Day 5: V-Ray Application on 3D architecture design. 30 DAY TRIAL SOFTWARE DOWNLOAD:MAYA 2012: http://www.autodesk.com/products/autodesk-maya/free-triaRHINO 4: http://s3.amazonaws.com/files.na.mcneel.com/rhino/4.0/2011-02-11/eval/rh40eval_en_20110211.exe3DS MAX 2010: http://www.autodesk.com/products/autodesk-3ds-max/free-trialVRAY FOR 3DS MAX: http://www.vray.com/vray_for_3ds_max/demo/thankyou.shtml#thankyouPHOTOSHOP e ILLUSTRATOR: https://creative.adobe.com/apps?trial=PHSP&promoid=JZXPS www.helenico.edu.mx www.scifi-architecture.com/#!workshops/c1wua LIKE US ON: www.facebook.com/scifiarchitecture …

Added by Luis A. Corona at 12:07pm on May 16, 2013

Search Results - 双色球和值尾数是8和9的数『1TBH·COM』全球通彩票代理注册2023年3月19日7时59分41秒.H5c2a3.ivhduifoj

About

Translate

Search

Photos

OpenNest + Galapagos

Circular Extrusions

Voronoi Canopies

Attractor Modules

Weave Facade

Videos

OpenNest + Galapagos

Circular Extrusions

Voronoi Canopies

Attractor Modules

Weave Facade

Origami Crane