Search Results - 双色球和值尾数是8和9的数『1TBH·COM』全球通彩票代理注册2023年3月19日7时59分41秒.H5c2a3.ivhduifoj

Event: informed skins | data-driven envelopes – GH workshop – Vienna: ugh information (whether coming from environmental analysis or any kind of database), extracting and managing informations for construction processes all require an understanding of data structures in order to build seamless design-to-construction pipelines. Through visual scripting in Grasshopper (Generative modeling plug-in for Rhinoceros) participants will learn how to build and develop parametric data structures (from basic simple lists to complex data trees), data-driven geometry and envelopes and how to extract relevant informations from such models for construction processes. Participants will also develop a personal envelope project and its full design-to-construction pipeline. [.]TopicsTheory: - Lecture: “Data Obsession” – computational designer as a new professional profile and the role of information and complexity in contemporary architectureTechnique: - Software interface - Components - Lists & Data Tree: management, manipulation, visualization - Geometry generation from data stream - Base exercises (Box morph, Image sampler, Floor sections, Attractor field, Multisection Pipe, Paneling) - Advanced exercise: Data-reactive component – data-reactive tessellation on NURBS surface. Data coming from environmental analysis or spreadsheet table - Advanced exercise: Data extraction from previous tessellation, visualization and storage in spreadsheets. - Advanced exercise: geometry optimization for construction[.]Software & skills:Basic modeling skills in Rhino are required. Participants should bring their own laptop with pre-installed software (software download links will be given after subscription).[.]Tutors:Alessio Erioli + Andrea Graziano – Co-de-iT (GH & design tutors).[.]Venue:The workshop venue will be:Polycollege WienJohannagasse 21050 Wienhttp://www.vhs.at/johannagasse.html[.]Calendar & Timetable:The workshop will have the following timetable throughout all the 4 days: 9:00-13:00 lesson+tutoring 14:00-17:00 lesson+tutoring[.]Subscription fees:For participants who register before 30/08/2012 we offer a EARLY BIRD feesE.B. – educational* : € 320 + VAT E.B. – professional: € 390 + VATafter 30/08/2012 will be in place the STANDARD fees:STANDARD fees – educational* : € 390 + VAT STANDARD fees – professional: € 490 + VAT* students, teachers, researchers & PhD (proof of status required).The deadline for registration is 06/09/2012; The workshop has a maximum of 30 places available and will be activated with a minimum number of 15 partecipants.[.]Application:To register please fill this FORM and send it via e-mail to:3ddreaming@gmail.com or ck@kkkc.at[.] Organized by:This workshop is organized by Co-de-iT in collaboration with:3d-dreaming.com – Architecture from a digital point of viewKKKC – Mediaware trading GmbH…; Added by Christian Kobierski at 9:15am on August 20, 2012

Comment on: Topic 'Finding an optimal size of PV panel in given array.': nderstand each other quite well. I will pick one piece of the PVsurface at the bottom row: So the label "1" represents the PVsurface for which the shading diagram will be created. Label "2" is the back facade (made of glass or opaque elements, does not matter).Label "3" represents the row of PVsurfaces above. Now take a look at how the shading diagram would look like for the mentioned PVsurface. I made some of its parts a bit incorrect on purpose, so that I could clearly the differences a bit easier: Label "1" would be first type of self-shading. It's the shading which prevents the PVsurface to "see" anything behind its back.Label "2" would be shading from the facade wall to which the PV surfaces are attached to. I deliberately colored it blue, to distinguish it from other two types of the shading. Otherwise it would look black.Label "3" is the second type of self-shading: the shading from the above row of PV surfaces.In literature, you won't find the terms: first and second type of self-shading. I invented them.To my knowledge, when self-shading is mention, this will probably be related with label "3" (second type of self-shading). It's the shading from the adjacent rows of PV modules in front, or like in this case above.So when I said: You do not have to supply the surfaces additionally to the context_ input. The component will "under the hood" add them to the context_ input to account for self shading. Last year this hasn't been the case, but after the suggestion by Chris Mackey, I changed this feature. This was related to the first type of self shading (label "1"). And when I said: However, as we are using the PV SWH System size component, there will be no self-shading. The PV SWH System size component positions the PV rows in such a way, that no self shading will appear for the given minimalSpacingPeriod_ criteria. This was related to the second type of self shading (label "3"). I should also mention that I made the upper photo a bit incorrect. If you would do the shading analysis, the label "3" would be almost non-existent. Here is how the shading diagram would actually look like: As mentioned this is because PV SWH System size component will position each PVsurface row in such a way, so that there would be no second type of self shading for the chosen minimalSpacingPeriod_ criteria. In our case, as the minimalSpacingPeriod_ criteria we chose the summer solstice in the Northern Hemisphere from 10 to 14 hours. We should have taken from 9 to 15, but we took from 10 to 14 to as on option of lowering the distance between the PV rows.This means that there will be no second type self-shading all year round from 10 to 14 hours. Let me know if all of this helps in any way.…; Added by djordje to Ladybug Tools at 12:10pm on May 28, 2016

Comment on: Topic 'Extract a polyhedron from a mesh or point cloud': st variety of papers (mostly related with LIDAR airborne sampled clouds) ... but ... hmm ... no code (other than some "abstract" algos that may (or may not) work). Reason? A very hot cake that one these days: from reverse engineering to DARPA founded future defense systems and up to cruse missiles pattern recognition algos. The solution (obviously doable only via code) is the so called flat hard clustering ... were points are sampled into clusters based on the coPlanarity "rule". For large amounts recursive octTrees (an oriented box divided in 8 "partitions") subdivisions are used and then pts are processed in parallel (and then clusters are re-evaluated in order to "absorb" other clusters with same plane A,B,C,D vars etc etc). See what's happening in a very carefully made test point collection: 3.7 ms and the "ideal" clustering (7 search loops VS the max 42M theoretical threshold): Depending on the pts "preparation" ... a considerable more time/search loops is required ... and ... well ... also "valid" clusters (4 points and up) made: So "ideally" speaking in your case: 1. Mesh faces center points (or alternatively: mesh vertices) are sampled into a pts collection . 2. Hard flat coPlanarity clustering is attempted yielding pts/planes in equivalent DataTrees. 3. Planar Breps are made with respect the planes (like the black things captured above) and sampled, say, into a breps List. 4. The method Brep[] solids = Brep.CreateSolid(breps); is used for attempting to create your desired "engulfing" brep. This method is very slow mind (other waaaay faster approaches also available). …; Added by peter fotiadis at 2:26am on August 17, 2016

Topic: Shape Grammar - Spatial Relationship between Tetrahedron + Pyramid: Tetrahedron: 24 Symmetries Pyramid: 8 Symmetries Design space = 24 X 8 = 192 permutations So I decided to write a simple orientation script to iterate over all permutations. And this is the result. Below are some technical notes. I used the vertices of the shapes for creating a 3 point plane, and used it for orientation. I used compound transform to combine multiple steps of transformation. The cross reference component is very handy, generating all the possible combinations without worrying too much about data tree. The spatial relationship and the basic grammar A -> A + B and B -> A + B The basic grammar and possible marker positions. All results in 6 iteration steps All results in 6 iteration steps (Top View)…; Added by Victor Leung at 5:19pm on April 7, 2014

Event: LAN-FLIGHT EUROPE January 9-16/17 2012 // innsbruck // stuttgart // barcelona: diverse group of design participants from afar for a full schedule of exchanges with leading practitioners, practices, fabrication labs… all while exposed to European transit infrastructure... trains planes & even a few mountain roads. LaN FLIGHT EUROPE marks LaN's fifth initiative on-the-fly & our first in EUROPE. JOIN us for the full trip or the leg that suits your interests. LaN is looking to attract a geographically diverse group of students & professionals with various design backgrounds. LaN FLIGHT 2012 EU is co-piloted by LaN Monika Wittig & Co-de-iT Andrea Graziano. LaN FLIGHT is looking for highly ambitious-adaptable-endurance oriented participants to fully embrace the nature of this curated experience. Please take a look at our 3 previous editions to best judge if this type of experience suits you. If you are willing to allot 8 days of your life to this pursuit and have no allergies to extreme mobility & group dynamics… welcome to LaN FLIGHT.…; Added by Andrea Graziano at 3:58am on December 5, 2011

Comment on: Topic '[Wish-suggestion] Bake+Reference geometry option.': mport the geometry again. Right? How about this? I add an extra object called something like "Geometry Cache". You have to give it a unique name. If you plug geometry data into the left side of this component, it will bake all that geometry and attach UserStrings to all those objects like "<name>: {0;0;3}(8)" where <name> would be your name and the rest is the exact location of that piece of geometry in a DataTree. It should probably also delete any objects already in the 3dm file that have that custom name/data assigned to them. If you don't plug any wires into the left side, it will instead search the 3dm file for all geometry with the appropriate user data, load them into a correct DataTree and supply that data to whoever plugs into the right side. If you plug wires in both ends, it will just function as a generic Geometry Parameter. It might be tricky to write a good event handler for this thing, maybe I'll just restrict myself to an UPDATE NOW! button on the object itself, so you can trigger an update manually. ps. benefit of this approach is that everyone can create and harvest geometry with such user text, whether they use Grasshopper or not. -- David Rutten david@mcneel.com Poprad, Slovakia…; Added by David Rutten at 8:56am on June 13, 2011

Comment on: Topic 'Dividing the truss member into compressional, tensional and null members?': me) And got the same result as you did. Suddenly the definition started working. Although I got this error message when I opened the compression tension null.gh file: Message log start (chronological): --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Plugin version: 0.8.0066 Input parameter chunk is missing. Archive is corrupt. Output parameter chunk is missing. Archive is corrupt. Output parameter chunk is missing. Archive is corrupt. Output parameter chunk is missing. Archive is corrupt. Why is that? Can I dare to ask you few more questions? 2) I want all of my members to be made of solid (not hollow) circular cross-sections. Does that mean that my diameter and thickness need to have the same values? Like this: ? 3) I have wind load from 8 directions. Is there a way in Karamba to create load groups and choose the one with the most extreme values (group that will be used as the most relevant one for dimensioning)? Thank you.…; Added by djordje to Karamba3D at 7:47am on August 15, 2012

Comment on: Blog Post 'metaball meshing': are just the 8 cases, so you're actually doing it right here (scroll down on this page, and you'll see a separate subset all about marching tetrahedrons http://paulbourke.net/geometry/polygonise/). The benefit to using marching tetrahedrons is exactly this: that the number of possible "cuts" through the tetrahedron are dramatically smaller in number than those through a cube. However, I have found that also what you're seeing that the linear interpolation creates some odd distortions (which is why I went ahead and later did the marching cubes implementation). Some of this comes from the density of the sampling grid: the more dense, the fewer distortions. What I would suggest, if you want a (relatively) quick way to improve this outcome: 1) build up a full mesh rather that bunch of surfaces, and use Rhinocommon to combine identical vertices, and rebuild the vertex normals 2) run a couple rounds of laplacian smoothing on the mesh to better distribute your vertices (for each vertex, make it equal in location to the average of its neighbours) 3) create a line normal to each vertex roughly the length of your sampling grid and test the endpoints of it against your scalar field formula, and then do one final linear interpolation between those two points for your vertex. This should give you a smoother mesh for sure. But good work getting this far! …; Added by David Stasiuk at 1:37am on February 6, 2015

Topic: Curves back to text: I kept adding new text every day until now... and now I have to change almost all the text I did type but... it's made of curves! So I was wondering if anyone has ever had similar problems solved by a gh definition In case no-one has ever had similar troubles (I think you all here are smarter than me :P) how would you proceed to create a similar definition, given all the text has same dimension and font? I would: a) create a set with all the possible character-curve in that Font b) create an identical set with the same characters as type c) compare this set with every given text-curve in the drawing (issue: the number 8 is made of 3 different curve .___. same as letter B... A has 2, as D, R, O, P, p and so on...) d) list item from set 'b' using pattern I get from 'c' e) evenctually -this is a moonshot in the moonshot- concatenate characters at 'd' based on proximity of different character-curves (to get "ABC" as a whole text, instead of "A" "B" and "C" as separate instances) It sounds kind of challenging! ...maybe I'm better start re-writing text NOW as it could EASILY take me a couple of days to get things done... :)…; Added by Ale Inno at 7:24pm on August 25, 2015

Group: FlexHopper: o: http://github.com/HeinzBenjamin/FlexCLI/issues Download You can find FlexHopper here: http://www.food4rhino.com/app/flexhopper and here: https://github.com/HeinzBenjamin/FlexCLI Info FlexHopper offers physics computation in Grasshopper. It is GPU-based and therefor very fast. Currently supported modes of simulation are: free particles, fluids, rigid bodies, soft bodies, tensile structures and cloth, custom constraints. FlexHopper is a Grasshopper plugin built on top of FlexCLI - Flex Common Language Interface. FlexCLI is built against NVidia Flex release 1.1.0. NVidia Flex is patented property of NVidia. FlexCLI and FlexHopper are openly accessible under the GNU License through my Github account. (Link above) For more information on NVidia Flex go here: https://developer.nvidia.com/flex and https://developer.nvidia.com/nvidia-flex-110-released FlexCLI runs on x64 architectures only. It was built against .Net 4.5.2 FlexHopper was tested with Rhino5 64bit and Grasshopper 0.9.0076 WIP Requirements Windows 7, 8, 8.1 or 10 64bit NVidia or AMD Graphics Card NVIDIA: GeForce Game Ready Driver 372.90 or above AMD: Radeon Software Version 16.9.1 or above…; Added by Benjamin Felbrich at 10:34am on January 29, 2018

Search Results - 双色球和值尾数是8和9的数『1TBH·COM』全球通彩票代理注册2023年3月19日7时59分41秒.H5c2a3.ivhduifoj

About

Translate

Search

Photos

OpenNest + Galapagos

Circular Extrusions

Voronoi Canopies

Attractor Modules

Weave Facade

Videos

OpenNest + Galapagos

Circular Extrusions

Voronoi Canopies

Attractor Modules

Weave Facade

Origami Crane