etting when I merge the three trees, but what I would like to get is:
essentially a tree with 27 branches, each with a single list of either 11 or 21 points.
{0} (N=11)
{1} (N=11)
...
{10} (N=21)
{11} (N=21)
...
{17} (N=11)
{18) (N=11)
{27} (N=11)
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
All the best,
Matt
…
Added by Matt Schmid at 3:06pm on December 4, 2010
onsecutive points at the same height then your 'Break at discontinuities' component eliminates the middle point completely and then the 'Interpolate Curve' component gives a much bigger bump in the wrong direction. This was enough to get curves to meet from opposite sides.
I fixed this by changing the heights to 1.1 or 2.9, rather than 1.0 and 3.0, but it took a little while to work it out! Sigh.
I attach a new version. But I actually preferred it as it was before. See what you think!
Bob
p.s. in the first list, elements 11, 12, 23 and 24 go from 1 to 3; elements 17 and 18 go from 3 to 1. In the second list, elements 6, 17, 18 and 29 go from 1 to 3; elements 12 and 23 go from 3 to 1. Given the above fix, these can be easily seen.…
Added by Bob Mackay at 10:40pm on November 24, 2015
rstand how it works. In the group titled "Find closed cells+statistics" the equality elements connected to the OR gates seem to not be working properly. As shown in the screenshot, firstly, X component tested for = 31 (0,0,0,0,2) (1) and X component tested for = -1 (0,0,0,0,0) (2). The result they show is false, but the panel connected to Deconstruct shows that the values are 31 and -1. Can anyone help?…
Added by John Cyrillos at 1:36pm on December 13, 2015
e
7. True
8. True <-- this one
9. True
10. False
11. True
12. False
13. True
14. True <-- this one
15. True
16. False
17. True
18. False
19. True
20. True <-- this one
21. True
22. False
23. True
24. False
25. True
26. True <-- this one
27. True
28. False
29. True
30. False
31. True
32. True <-- this one
33. True
Any idea how I can solve this?
Thanks!…