pe and its surface.
However, I don't have that much knowledge about both grasshopper and Mathematica.. I mean I can only make assumptions and think about relations of certain functions but that's all.
If you can help me on this, I would appreciate it so much.
You can see a screenshot of the code and model of the demonstration from mathematica in attachment.
And here is the mathematica code;
Manipulate[ Module[{\[CurlyEpsilon] = 10^-6, c1 = Tan[a1], c2 = Tan[a2], c3 = Tan[a3], c4 = Tan[a4], c5 = Tan[a5], c6 = Tan[a6]}, ContourPlot3D[ Evaluate[ c6 Sin[3 x] Sin[2 y] Sin[z] + c4 Sin[2 x] Sin[3 y] Sin[z] + c5 Sin[3 x] Sin[y] Sin[2 z] + c2 Sin[x] Sin[3 y] Sin[2 z] + c3 Sin[2 x] Sin[y] Sin[3 z] + c1 Sin[x] Sin[2 y] Sin[3 z] == 0], {x, \[CurlyEpsilon], Pi - \[CurlyEpsilon]}, {y, \[CurlyEpsilon], Pi - \[CurlyEpsilon]}, {z, \[CurlyEpsilon], Pi - \[CurlyEpsilon]}, Mesh -> False, ImageSize -> {400, 400}, Boxed -> False, Axes -> False, NormalsFunction -> "Average", PlotPoints -> ControlActive[10, 30], PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"]], {{a1, 1, "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(\[Alpha]\), \(1\)]\)"}, -Pi/2 - 0.01, Pi/2 + 0.01, ImageSize -> Tiny}, {{a2, 1, "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(\[Alpha]\), \(2\)]\)"}, -Pi/2 - 0.01, Pi/2 + 0.01, ImageSize -> Tiny}, {{a3, 1, "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(\[Alpha]\), \(3\)]\)"}, -Pi/2 - 0.01, Pi/2 + 0.01, ImageSize -> Tiny}, {{a4, 1, "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(\[Alpha]\), \(4\)]\)"}, -Pi/2 - 0.01, Pi/2 + 0.01, ImageSize -> Tiny}, {{a5, 1, "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(\[Alpha]\), \(5\)]\)"}, -Pi/2 - 0.01, Pi/2 + 0.01, ImageSize -> Tiny}, {{a6, 1, "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(\[Alpha]\), \(6\)]\)"}, -Pi/2 - 0.01, Pi/2 + 0.01, ImageSize -> Tiny}, AutorunSequencing -> {1, 3, 5}, ControlPlacement -> Left]…
Could someone please tell me if it is possible to input a non repetitive relative item pattern as shown below. I am interested in something like this
0 {0;0}
1 {1;0}
2 {1;6+i}
3 {0;6+i}
Thanks, Dan
e possible to change the component definition making possible to customize the number of outputs.Now Dispatch moves "true" values to A and "False" values to B
INPUT:
L (List to work on) -> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
D (Dispatch Pattern) -> True, False
OUTPUT:
A (List) -> 1, 3, 5, 7
B (List) -> 2, 4, 6, 8
Could it be possible/useful to modify it so it could dispatch items to several outputs, like:
INPUT:
L (List to work on) -> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0
D (Dispatch Pattern) -> A, B, C
OUTPUT:
A (List) -> 1, 4, 7, 0
B (List) -> 2, 5, 8
C (List) -> 3, 6, 9
maybe I'm missing something and there's already a component with this function... I have been searching on the forum for half afternoon, but can't find anything about it!
Thank you!…
would like to group the paths based on their item count (n) values resulting in a tree which should look something like this:
{0;0} (3)
{0;1} (2)
{0;2} (2)
{0;3} (1)
in other words, all paths with 2 items are under one path, all with 6 items in another, and so on.
I feel that the pathmapper should be able to do this very easily but cannot figure out what the expression should be... I have tried searching the forum but have not had much luck!
Any ideas? Thanks a ton!…
number of divisions on that curve as in the defintion (i.e. by 4). The offset in the def is slightly different and should cull two or three more curves as in the lists that show my aim below.
Basically I want to look into each branch of the groups of points from each closed curve . Marking in a list whether it contains a one or a zero (0= outside 1 = coincidents).
{0;0}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;1} 0. 01. 22. 03. 2 {0;2}0. 01. 02. 03. 0 {0;3}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;4}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;5}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;6}0. 01. 22. 23. 1 {0;7}0. 21. 22. 03. 0 {0;8}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;9}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;10}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;11}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;12}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;13}0. 01. 22. 23. 0 {0;14}0. 21. 22. 23. 2
I want to create a list from these points. That marks each curve that pokes out, in a cull pattern as such:
20022210222202
Using a 1 where there are co-incidents in the curve points and the boundary. A 2 for true (outside points) and a 0 for containment. So I might be able to use the 1 in future developments - however if a true false list is easiest I can live with that.
So could I use F(x) function? - to look for 0 or 1's in each bunch of points and thus list as such for a cull pattern? or will Path mapper help me here? Or can I rely on simply grafting and splitting??
I am usure of the neatest solution and would love to learn. Hope you can direct me.rgrds
J.…
nique paths for your 5 different heights. They will need to be replaced with two-level paths according to height and letter index. That's 5*6 = 30 unique paths to 30 sub-lists. Each item has its item index within the list. The combined path+index address will be unique for all items. you will also get a unique address for each item if you just flatten the hole thing and use the item index...
2) check the attached definition…
inds 3 points closer than the threshold and 3 furhter
3. It forms 3 groups containing 3 points each + 3 separate groups containing 1 point each
Is that correct?
Also, how to extract one of the group? I wanted to use Tree Item and write number of the group in index but I don't know what "path" is for.
Thanks in advance for answer,
PS: Can I ask anyone for a very simple example in gh of how this component works and showing how to extract one of the groups?…