thing about how to use Grasshopper to break up the unit modules as parameterization. Is there any Grasshopper Master could help me? The result i want is looks cool and easy to build.
Reference:
https://vimeo.com/98518748 Video link
http://www.designboom.com/architecture/robotically-fabricated-landesgartenschau-exhibition-hall-06-25-2014/
The question:
1,In the video,How to process parametric form?(kangaroo?)
2,After make all the things on the round surface, how to change the Tangency circle into flat polygon?
3, at last ,how to link every unit module?
…
faces (maked in RED, GREEB and BLUE) are shared by two zones. The small zones (in GRAY) attached to the big hall are not taken into consideration in the research.
In this case, inclined surfaces are included, as the simplification of the grandstand for spectators.
As the image shows, I have some questions:
1 - What should be the correct “surface type” of the inclined surfaces? floor?wall? or else?
(Actually, I have tried both floors and walls, but warnings shown below were received. The weird thing is that they had been assigned as floors and walls respectively having checked by the "decomposeByType" component.
2 - Can I ignore these warnings? if not, why and how can I deal with it - how to assign inclined surfaces as proper "type"?
3 - How can I get "interiorWalls"?
Although the small zones attached to the large hall are not considered in the research, I still need to assigned the shared walls as interior Walls (and set EPBC as "Adiabatic"), right? But, having checked by the "decomposeByType" component regrading walls, all I got were "walls" instead of "interiorWalls". Then, how can I get "interiorWalls" as I want?
Btw, due to the complexity of the geometry (e.g. containing inclined surfaces), I formed the thermal zone of the sports hall surface by surface using the "createHBSrfs" component as shown in above images. Do you think if it is a proper way in my case?
Any help will be much appreciated!
Ding
…
vided with U and V into line segments (i'd prefer to use that method instead of rectangular grid). These segments in U direction would then be rotated around V lines segments with min value of 0 and max value of 90 degrees, according to attractor (i'd like it to be image sampler in the end but for now im trying with point/multiple points). These lines would then be lofted
I post the definition below
Here are my problems (i marked them in definition):
1)i managed to get U direction line in every second row, i dont know how to get the lines between the rest (i tried shifting list, but didnt manage to get the right result).
2)Harder part - id like to measure distance between attractor point and a bottom point of lines. Than i would like to transfer it to rotation this way (distances used just as example): distance 0-20 - angle of rotation 0degrees; distance 20-30 - angle of rotation 1-90 degrees. I have no idea how to transfer it into definition. I also have problems remapping numbers to 0-90 value.
3)I'd like to do that later but i'd also like to use black-white image sampler as white - 0 angle of rotation, black - 90 degrees. I never experimented with image sampler and would be grateful for some advice how transfer colors into degree values.
I politely ask you to help me (especially with first two points i mentioned). I'm not asking for a ready definition - I would like to understand where my mistakes are.
Below i post a picture of something simmilar (although im trying to rotate it by edge, not by center line)
Pardon my english, thank you for your time and help.
Enjoy your weekend.…
t;Custom additional code> Bob[] b = new Bob[] {new Bob(1), new Bob(2), new Bob(3)};
class Bob{....
}
//But how to make something like this in a loop?
// <Custom additional code>
Bob[] b = new Bob[10];
for(int i = 0; Bob.Length; i++){
b[i] = new Bob(i);
}…
ree-form surface or polysurface.
As mentioned in the discussion title, I would like to create a look, similar to the beijing water cube, but not on a planar surface. And also the bubbles should only be very slightly tensioned.
I have tried 3 methods, they are all in the .gh file and best result ( smoothness of bubble) gives the "extrude to point" method. The problem is, the resulting mesh borders are not even close to the original surface, because of u,v setting to 1. I want the bubbles to have the original outline as border line. I don´t know if this is even possible.
The other methods are not very satisfying. ( I tried "inflate mesh" and third method was to patch the surface and point)
If somebody took a look in the file, I would be very glad.
Also there is another problem with the offset of the voronoi curves. Depending on the offset distance, the algorythm gives bad results. I used the clipper plugin, and have currently seen also pics of lines sticking out of the offset. Is there any solution for this?
For the bubbles, I have also seen similar solutions in the forum, but don´t know how to achieve them.Here is the pic of this solution, also posted in this forum and the discussion is here:http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/non-planar-voronoi-definition?commentId=2985220%3AComment%3A832079The result I see here, has rounded borders of the voronoi extrusion, which I would not like to get. So I hope this is enough information.thx a lot.
Merken…
ake this example. However, I still have minor bugs.
Whenever I save and reopen the file, I could not unclick the drop down menu to fold the additional input. See pictures below.
1. When I open the gh file.
2. The input is not folded.
3. When I click again, additional input is now duplicated with itself.
Does anyone know how to fix this situation? Any comment will be appreciated.
I attach the C# file below. Thanks! …
ust assume this is really what is being imported with the standard import line I see in all the examples:
# scriptcontext moduleimport RhinoPython.Host as __host'''The Active Rhino document (Rhino.RhinoDoc in RhinoCommon) while a scriptis executing. This variable is set by Rhino before the exection of every script.'''doc = None'''Identifies how the script is currently executing1 = running as standard python script2 = running inside grasshopper component3... potential other locations where script could be running'''id = 1'''A dictionary of values that can be reused between execution of scripts'''sticky = dict()def escape_test( throw_exception=True, reset=False ): "Tests to see if the user has pressed the escape key" rc = __host.EscapePressed(reset) if rc and throw_exception: raise Exception('escape key pressed') return rc def errorhandler(): ''' The default error handler called by functions in the rhinoscript package. If you want to have your own predefined function called instead of errorhandler, replace the scriptcontext.errorhandler value ''' return None…
Added by Nik Willmore at 7:47pm on October 10, 2015
ave pointed out, if the older version of Honeybee EPZone does not have the recirculatedAirPerArea proprety, then it must be the cause of the error as I am using the Honeybee_Export to OpenStudio component (VER 0.0.58 Nov_07_2015). Given the discrepancy between the version of the Honeybee components used to setup everything in the file all the way prior to the point feeding the zones' data into the Export to Open Studio component, I can see different options/questions to tackle this issue:
1- I have the OpenStudio 1.9.0 that works with EnergyPlusV8-3-0 installed on my computer and the reason that I had to use the newer version of the Honeybee_Export to OpenStudio component (VER 0.0.58 Nov_07_2015) is that I had initially received an error message using the component of the same version as consistent with the rest of the project (VER 0.0.57 Jul_15_2015) with the following content:
"Cannot find OpenStudio libraries. You can download the libraries from the link below. Unzip the file and copy it to C:\Users\Alireza\AppData\Roaming\Ladybug\OpenStudio and try again. Click on the link to copy the address.https://app.box.com/s/y2sx16k98g1lfd3r47zi"
The download link provided in the error message appears to be not active and thereby, I could not follow the instructions on the error message and make the Hoenybee_Export to OpenStudio component (VER 0.0.57 Jul_15_2015) work.
Therefore, if there is a way to make this version (VER 0.0.57 Jul_15_2015) of the Hoenybee_Export to OpenStudio component work by downloading the OpenStudio libraries or switching to a legacy version of the OpenStudio application prior to 1-9-0, then probably this would be one option to solve this issue.
2- When I realized I could not download the OpenStudio libraries as described in section 1 (see above) and make the Honeybee_Export to OpenStudio Component (VER 0.0.57 Jul_15_2015) work with the installed OpenStudio application (V1-9-0), I updated the entire installation of Ladybug + Honeybee User Object files to the new version (Ladybug_0_0_61 and Honeybee_0_0_58). This time the Honeybee_Export to OpenStudio component (VER 0.0.58 Nov_07_2015) seemed to be working with the installed OpenStudio application (V1-9-0) as I did not receive any error messages about missing OS libraries. However, I could not make things work since all other components in my project (eg. Creat HB Zones,Creat HB Surface) have been setup with the 0.0.57 version and obviously, the updated version of the Honeybee User Objects (V0.0.58) could not recognize my HB component of the previous version in the file.
If there is a way to make 'in-place' updates of HB components, for example updating the Honeybee_Create HB Zones in the file without having to re-wire everything from scratch, then it probably would work as the updated version will include the 'recirculatedAirPerArea' property. Otherwise, given the complexity of the scene, it appears to be impossible for me to start everything from scratch and setup the entire scene with the new version of HB components.
3- If none of the options in the last two sections (see above) would be possible, I was wondering if there is a way to open the zones' data as the outcome of the Honeybee_Solve Adjacency component (prior to feeding this data to the Honeybee_Open Studio Systems component and subsequently, to the the Hoenybee_Export to Open Studio) in a text-editor and manually add the missing recirculatedAirPerArea property to the zones' data; then probably I could do that and then eventually feed it to the Hoenybee_Export to Open Studio component.
These are the three options that I could think of in order to tackle this issue of mine. I apologize for the extended reply but I figured it would be better to give a more comprehensive description of my problem and previous attempts to solve it.
Any helps is most appreciated.
Please let me know if you need further information about the described issues in each section or the simulation scene setup in general.
Thank you,
Alireza
…
project below- should I be learning Grasshopper & Rhino or just Rhino first?
I'm trying to panel modules with low tolerances- I've prototyped regular shapes like geodesics and am now looking to experiment with irregular shapes with lots of different panel shapes.
I understand some things are best done through Grasshopper when using Paneling Tools- I'm trying to figure out if I can do what I want to achive with PT alone or should do it through Grasshopper (or some other route).
I’m on the MAC WIP - The module was built in Sketchup - all the components seem to be in order as blocks though am having problems running the ptpanel3dcustom command - thinking maybe a bug in the WIP or something wrong with my input or that I imported the sketchup file the wrong way. (I dropped it in the window) - If the 3D command is run it doesn’t do anything - if 2D (ptpanelgridcustom) it crashes.
The tileing pattern - the green rectangle is a refrence. each tile contains 4 blocks with 3 more nested in each.
How the module tiles.
The other thing I'm trying to do is specify that most of the lines in the panels don’t bend/curve when they are paneled (or something like Cage Edited). For my purposes the length & angles can change while the lines must remain straight.
These images show a test tile to be panneled on a ellipsoid. When the tile is mapped to the grid the lines curve, this is an extreme example but notice allot of tiles far from the hemespheres are also bent slightly.
These two questions have me stumped the most for now. What should I look into get a better handle on these problem areas? Maybe I should try recreating the work on a windows machine? or perhaps I should get started with Grasshopper?
Thanks for reading.
Lu…