me in 19 different pipeline components. Marginally better, but I'll still need to do this operation approx. 80 times...gulp.
Here's a wishlist request for David: expose string inputs in the Geometry Pipeline for Layer and Name. If I had that, I could change one string to swap my whole geometry set! (My layers have names like "B1 red rail", "B1 blue rail" etc., then the next time I'll want "B2 red rail", "B2 blue rail" etc.)
BTW, I'm happy to script something in C# if it will help: maybe I could write something like the Geometry Pipeline that takes a string input for layer name? Hmmm...
…
سلام آقای جان بیلی کاوه اشکوه هستم اپراتور سی ان سی از ایران وطراح دکوراسیون داخلی اگر ممکن هستش فایل اصلی میزcosinosa baram mail konid adressmail man hast
(kavehoshkooh2290@gmail.com)بسیار متشکرم
Added by kavehoshkooh at 3:25pm on September 11, 2015
gone with the wind topic: since this is utterly Academic the main issue here is to oversimplify LBS (in real life: a collection of columns/beams/slabs/X members + tube frame rigid members (shafts/elevators/cats/dogs)). Reason is that if we use the real "solids" (turned into meshes) as the "node" pool for the hinges required ... only HAL 9000 could solve it in "real-time" (for instance an E5 Xeon 1630 v3 takes ... several minutes). And this is ... er ... challenging I must say. This is a typical case where "simplifying" means "stupidity" almost instantly.
Spam on:
where's my collection of "bend-a-truss-that-looks-like-a-tower" K1 demo defs? Is in this workstation or in another? (blame Alzheimer).
Spam off.
More soon.…
rotate back to zero degree (start position) then don't rotate, then rotate to -80 degree, then back to zero degree (start position) and stay there.
I hope the you can help me.
Thank you.
…
Chris,
Again the number of curves which SubCrv gives me is different from the actual curve on the surface! for example it gives me 80 curves in which there are 20 curves!