as the coordinates to move the objects vs the global system they are on by default.
If I could plug my new planes into the xyz component that might solve my problem but this is clearly not possible.
any help would be greatly appreciated...…
ase to give the same result using a graph mapper with a parabola as in the attached file
Unfortunately it never gave the same result ..... is it a mistake in the book ?!…
moved by random amounts in a random direction. The animated slider was the amount of deviation from the original points. And yes, I used culled lists.B.t.w. did you find my workaround for your loft? Did your notebook explode? ;)…
tecture. Hochbau | University of Innsbruck . A simple random, but at the same time organised growth routine. 5 iterations for this image.
Link to the course here:
http://www.exparch.at/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1054&Itemid=87
View full size...as per Pieter's suggestion…
gone with the wind topic: since this is utterly Academic the main issue here is to oversimplify LBS (in real life: a collection of columns/beams/slabs/X members + tube frame rigid members (shafts/elevators/cats/dogs)). Reason is that if we use the real "solids" (turned into meshes) as the "node" pool for the hinges required ... only HAL 9000 could solve it in "real-time" (for instance an E5 Xeon 1630 v3 takes ... several minutes). And this is ... er ... challenging I must say. This is a typical case where "simplifying" means "stupidity" almost instantly.
Spam on:
where's my collection of "bend-a-truss-that-looks-like-a-tower" K1 demo defs? Is in this workstation or in another? (blame Alzheimer).
Spam off.
More soon.…
A low-resolution work. Real time motion capture display made with an 11x8 (88) pixels iPad matrix using Grasshopper + Firefly + Pure Data + TouchOSC for iPad.
a working solution with replacing this line of code with:
Dim charList As New List(Of Char)(charArr)
Is this because of a version incompatibility (I'm using Rhino 4.0, and GH 0.8.0062)? Just curious.
Regards,
JJ…
f the mesh was self-intersecting everywhere. So instead I used Millipede (isosurface) to get the same undulations, but ignore the complex 'folds', you can see the difference in cross section thickness. I then tessellated it with the inverse pattern of the outer surface.
To make it a single 3d printable mesh, i just deleted a single face on inner and outer skin, then lofted the naked edges. (creating a tiny hole through the model). Therefore creating a single mesh that folds in on itself, not sure if there is a better way of defining the space between two meshes as the solid area...
Full GH (Kangaroo - Meshmachine - Weaverbird - Millipede)
Special thanks to Laurent Delrieu for his interesting offset mesh method that i based my approach on.
http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/offset-mesh-problems-with-3d-mesh-with-weaverbird…
Added by Nick Tyrer at 5:25am on December 10, 2015