volute Tools Pro, Plan C: C# using LibShapeOp stuff, Plan D: C# using Gegenbauer/Chebyshev "filtering"/"noise" correction). Unfortunately I have classified the latter as stuff for internal use only in my practice and ... well ... hmm ... it's not for sharing, I'm so sorry.
2. Or by offseting the hex curves on surface (dist according the attractor(s) influence) and then lofting this with that (offset not planar ... but "close" if the divisions and the topology are "suitable"). Unfortunately this is the slowest "method" known to man. Unacceptable by any means.
3. Or by modifying this C# with regard the planarity of the "inwards" loft profile (that's rather very easy):
But you have very limited time and something urgent occurred in my practice (as usual) + today is the Assen MotoGP and N46 is on pole! therefor I'm not sure that the whole combo could/would be ready on time for you.
Moral: next time > avoid doing/scheduling things ... er ... hmm ... the Greek way [i.e.: the very last moment at 23.59 that is, he he]). This method is known in Greece as "bakaliko" (don't ask what this means).…
s are not real rhino circles, they are dwg-imports from illustrator, so they dont have weighted cvs but the deviation from an ideal circle is about 6/1000 (neglectable, only to let you know).what i need is lines normal to the circle (= pointing from one circle center to the next) at the intersection points of two circles. as the circles intersect at only one point, they share the same tangent at this point. i contructed the (orange) lines in rhino to show, what i mean.the circles are the result of a circle packing algorithm, so they are not always intersecting perfectly, as shown on a separate layer.the intersection poits were generated in grasshopper. i attached the definition just as a "very beginning to the problem".if this is more complex than you expected and you dont feel like likesolving it, i wont be disappointed. otherwise i´d like to thank you in advance.cheersroberto…
ation model, and I would be very grateful if you could help me to have a look.
1. The air change rate is assumed to be 0.5 times per hour and the infiltration rate is 0.1 times per hour, so I sum these two values and set the converted infiltration rate per area as 0.0005 m3/s-m2. I don’t know whether it is appropriate to sum these numbers and input them together in the “infiltration rate per area” part?
2. I found in the latest version, there is a component called “air flow”, which can edit natural ventilation, but if I set minIndoorTempForNatVent equal to the heatingSePt as you showed once in the forum, the simulation result of heating is ridiculous high (like 7000 kwh/m2a). If the minIndoorTempForNatVent value is set to be a little higher than the heatingSePt, the heating result looks much normal (like 200 kwh/m2a). I don't know whether there is anything wrong with my model or settings, and hope you could help me.
3. I want to add the cooling and heating COP values (2.8 and 0.8) in my simulation process. I have noticed that in the forum, you mentioned that the new component "setEPIdealAir" can help to add COP, but I am still very confused about how exactly it works. I would be very grateful if you could show me again here.
4. I tried to change the WWR and the U-value of the wall, but I found the results of cooling and heating (especially cooling) vary little, which is not supposed to be like that. I guess there should be something wrong...
That's all for my questions.
Thank you so much for your time in advance. I would be very grateful if you could help me in this model. It would be very helpful for my work.
Thank you again!
Cheers,
Yao…
component and connect to L data from A and to i data from B I would like it to make tree like :
path {0,0}
a
b
c
path {0,1}
b
c
d
path {1,0}
e
f
g
path {1,1}
f
g
h
…
he same results as the component "evaluate curve" :D
By cons how can you have the length of a curve? Because the value of the domain does not give me the length.
"domain.T1" gives 27 and my length's curve is 24
I also have other small questions:
- Is it normal that the "run script" button does not work?
List <Curve> c = new List <Curve> ();
I declare a list and when I type "c." The drop-down list of available functions does not appear, is this normal?
Where can I find the functions available for these lists?
…
ion of surfaces and/or "solids" : it's a very complex assembly of "components" either bespoke or widely available in the market. This demo combo summarizes the "common" cases (but the insulation for the opaque parts is WRONG 100%):
2. Contemporary trends (a bit of nonsense) point towards "liquid" forms. These ARE NOT made via "classic" linear systems. Very few actually can do it (I mean: do it yielding a building that doesn't leak]). Here's a totally wrong take on that matter from a very reputable Swiss facade maker:
And er ... hmm ... this :
3. Facade systems (curtain walls, that is) are classified in 4 classes: (a) the good old known humble stuff like the one shown in the first image (b) semi structural [yes], (c) structural [NO] and (d) planar frame-less systems.
4. Designing any proper facade is impossible with Rhino/GH: you'll need totally different software apps to do it - in real life - despite what most people believe/hope/wish.
5. Designing anything without a proper bottom-top approach (I.e. : first do the pistons then the engine) is the best recipe for not becoming (ever) a pro .…
yet accessible features that have been well factored.
I’m impressed with the mainline experience overall. BUT, and this is a huge but, Rhino5 has an absolutely massive bug right in the middle of the engine. I, of course, refer to the Boolean Problem. I’ve put the product down cussing 4 times already after realizing that I’d just lost 3 hours trying to figure out why something doesn’t work, only to realize that I’m up against yet another derivation of The Boolean Problem.
I’m written McNeel tech support about the issue. They’ve offered file-specific workarounds in response. But these workarounds don’t allow a solution that can be used resolve generalized characterizations of the bug in Grasshopper programs. Brian, the support tech I’ve dealt with on this problems goes on to say that I shouldn’t expect any significant fixes for this problem.
I’m shocked that major revision 5 of a seemingly mature product as Rhino is has such a gigantic, mainline bug in the very core of its engine. But even more surprising is Brian’s suggestion that perhaps I’m just not ready for a product like Rhino. He further suggests that I post, as I’m doing here, to see what other people think about this bug.
So what am I missing? Where do experienced Rhino/Grasshopper users find themselves on the continuum between this being a big hairy bug that should have been fixed long ago and my just not being ready for Rhino?
I’ll accept any input and consensus that prevails.
- Bob…
Added by neobobkrause at 2:34pm on October 3, 2016
; }
DA.SetDataList(0, crvS);
distance << is "double (input)".
But... still have error.
Even all there below have error.
crvList[0].OffsetOnSurface(brep.Faces[0], distance, 0.001));
crvList[0].OffsetOnSurface(brep.Faces[1], distance, 0.001));
crvList[0].OffsetOnSurface(brep.Faces[2], distance, 0.001));
crvList[0].OffsetOnSurface(brep.Faces[3], distance, 0.001));
crvList[0].OffsetOnSurface(brep.Faces[4], distance, 0.001));
I don't know why it's still doesn't work.
…
to be used. This to me was an exercise rather than as a plugin.
I'm not sure of your question, refers to this?
Gh_transform can concatenate the transformations (which without that perhaps this component did not have much sense), and also can of course split the concatenation. If you want the step 3 (index 2), then choose the transformations 0, 1 and 2 and concatenate them. The file above (and the video, at end) has an example of this. If you mean something else, please let me know.
Oh damn, I just saw that the undo has stopped working, shit xD you meant that? Something I changed at the last time that it crashed, I will fix it soon.…