sando las nuevas tecnologías de la información en la arquitectura para la gestión del conocimiento de sistemas que desarrollen estructuras sustentables, desde los procesos de diseño generativos o algorítmicos. Donde se contempla la P.O.O. (programación orientada a objetos) como nuevo lenguaje de expresión para el arquitecto-diseñador en el siglo XXI.Los talleres están pensados para sigan un hilo conductual en el que al mismo tiempo que se enseña se investiga y experimenta. Por primera vez se contará con diversos miembros de SEED como docentes de forma presencial y por video conferencia, logrando de esta forma acercar a los especialistas que se encuentran en Europa a los asistentes de los talleres sin encarecer los costos.+info:http://www.studioseed.net/ adn-methodology/
Los talleres están dirigidos a personas que tengan o quieran conseguir un perfil alto de innovación, creatividad, flexibilidad: profesionales con actividades de dirección, gerencia, proyectistas, investigadores, así como a estudiantes a partir de 5to semestre en adelante. Cada taller abarca perfiles diversos de profesionales, mientras unos están más orientados a directivos y gerencias, otros más a proyectistas.
LOS TALLERES:FAB DIG I / ITESM – CEM / Estado de México / 20 hrs / 8 – 11 al de diciembre 2011 (En este taller no se aplican descuentos ni becas)PARAMETRIC GREEN HOUSING / Colegio de Arquitectos del estado de Jalisco (Por confirmar Sede) / Guadalajara / 20h + 5h proyecto / 30 enero 2012 al 4 de diciembre 2012FAB DIG II / ITESM – CEM / Estado de México / 30h + 5h proyecto / 8 a 12 febrero 2012TERCERA REVOLUCIÓN INDUSTRIAL: TIC`s + SOSTENIBILIDAD. Procesos y paradigmas emergentes / Querétaro / 20 hrs / 15 al 18 de febrero 2012INTRODUCCIÓN AL DISEÑO GENERATIVO / UAM-azc / DF / 8hrs / 13, 14 de enero (Costo representativo $650, máximo 40 personas, mínimo 15 personas)INTRODUCCIÓN A: SCRIPTING CON GRASSHOPPER ( Python) Y PLUGINS / Estudio SEED México / Estado de México / 30 hrs / 23, 24, 25 febrero y 1,2, 3 de marzo 2012…
Added by SEED studio at 3:30am on November 24, 2011
Loop'. The fun part of the slower version is that you can see what it's doing while it's running. 'Fast Loop' gives no indication that it's working, so you want to test it with small numbers and be sure it's coded properly before bumping the iteration count up.
The GH profiler running the slow version showed between 1 and 1.5 seconds per loop, but the reality was more like ~10 seconds per loop toward the end of an 11 X 11 grid, or ~20 minutes total. It's easier to be patient because you know it's working.
The 'Fast Loop' finished the same grid in 1.6 minutes! An impressive improvement. I've been running it on a 30 X 30 grid (900 points) for ~23 minutes so far and see nothing yet. Not the ~12 minutes I had hoped for... Now 36 minutes on this loop for 900 points... hope it's not stuck. Not fast! Later - DONE!! Profiler says 59 minutes for 900 points but it was more like an hour and twenty minutes total. It succeeded, I have a single 'Closed Brep' from 900 extruded rings, baked to Rhino.
Another strategy to explore would be doing 'SUnion' on a smaller grid using the Anemone loop, then replicate it by moving it as needed to form a larger grid; then run the copies through another 'SUnion' loop. I went ahead and implemented that while waiting. It works and is fast! Started with 3 X 3 and ran the result again as 5 X 5 (9 X 25 = 225 total) in barely ~70 seconds!? Trying 36 X 36 now... 1,296 points appears to have succeeded in less than ten minutes! Though it seems to take quite awhile after the loop ends before control is restored to GH/Rhino. I'll let you do your own experiments and benchmarks.
I encapsulated the loop in a cluster called 'suLoop' (blue groups).
Internal of 'suLoop' cluster:
…
Added by Joseph Oster at 11:14pm on March 22, 2017
ells new products like the Firefly Interactive Prototyping Shield which mounts on top of your Arduino Uno and provides access to a number of useful input (ie. sensors) and output (ie. motors) devices. It includes features like:
Three linear slide potentiometers connected to analog pins 0, 1, and 2
Two-axis joystick connected to analog pins 3 and 4
Light sensor (photocell) connected to analog pin 5
Three push buttons connected to digital pins 2, 4, and 7
Red LED connected to digital pin 13
RGB LED connected to digital pins 3, 5, and 6
Two servo connections on digital pins 8 and 9
A connection to the Easy Stepper Driver (co-designed by Sparkfun Electronics and Brian Schmalz) to control stepper motors. The direction of the motor is controlled through digital pin 10 and the number of steps through digital pin 12
High-voltage MOSFET circuit capable of driving lights, valves, DC motors, solenoids, or anything else requiring higher voltage or current. The gate of the MOSFET is connected to digital pin 11 (PWM).
Some come take a look and let us know what you think!
…
dellatore nurbs, Rhinoceros. Attraverso una serie di esercizi che si svolgeranno durante il corso, si spiegheranno i temi fondamentali che stanno alla base della modellazione generativa e del design parametrico.
Il corso è rivolto a chi ha già una familiarità minima con la modellazione attraverso Rhinoceros e vuole ampliare le proprie competenze verso il campo della modellazione parametrica e generativa, e si terrà da martedì 22.10.2016 a giovedì 24.10.2016 – dalle 10:00 alle 17:00.
Potete scaricare qui il PROGRAMMA DEL CORSO.
Il calendario dei corsi è consultabile qui.
VEGA Parco Scientifico TecnologicoVia della Libertà 12 – VeneziaEdificio Porta dell’Innovazione – Piano Terra
Per iscriversi al corso è necessario essere registrati al sito.Per tesserarvi al Fablab Venezia, diventare maker, usufruire dei vantaggi, clicca qui.
Le iscrizioni chiuderanno giovedì 17.11.2016.
Il corso ha un costo di 270,00 euro + iva (329.40) per i tesserati e convenzionati,per i non tesserati il costo sarà di 330,00 + iva (402.60) euro.
Vuoi risparmiare? Iscriviti entro tre settimane dalla data di inizio corso, usufruirai automaticamente dell’offerta “early bird” ovvero uno sconto del 20% sul costo a te dedicato.
Per iscriversi:
http://www.fablabvenezia.org/parametric-design-with-grasshopper/…
n en el diseño y fabricación digital de formas complejas y euclidianas.
Tomando como plataforma Grasshopper con RHINO, se explora y optimiza el diseño y fabricación de topologías complejas bajo los entornos de "Grasshopper", "RhinoNest" y "RhinoCAM" así como la parte de renderizado tipo high-end con Brazil.
D-O-F De 8:00 AM a 12:00 PM y de 1:00 PM a 5:00 PM
Contenidos:
1. Modelado Avanzado y sus Tecnicas. Aplanado y Desarrollo de Superficies.Anidado y distribución Nesting.
2. Introducción al Diseño Paramétrico.Definiciones Avanzadas de Grasshopper,posibilidades y limitaciones. Ajustes de escala para impresión y corte.
3. Introducción a la Manufactura en CNC - RhinoCAM 2.0.
4. Guía Paso a Paso para la realización de un Renderizado usando Brazil 2.0. Presentación DIGITAL de proyectos.
Docentes:
Andrés González - CEO McNeel Miami
Ovidio Cardona - Especialista en RhinoCAM y Zebra
Juan David Moreno - Especialista en Rhino y Brazil
Inversión:
$650 000 (Incluye licencia Educativa y Certificación de McNeel)
$550 000 ( Incluye Certificación de McNeel)
Informes:
Bits LTDA Tel: 412 30 15
Laboratorio de Imagen Facultad de Arquitectura Tel: 430 94 32…
am to find the coverage for various public-transport stations and is interested under what conditions that coverage will poorly represent reality, then that would fit perfectly within your proposed forum, but the SO people will close it as off-topic before you can say directed-infrastructure-networks.
Or discussing which properties of a transport network would be sufficient to encode into a graph in order to give a model accurate enough for early design iterations.
Or discussing the fabrication costs under various manufacturing methods of elements (a, b, c, ...) with amounts (K, L, M, ...). ie. is it cheaper to manufacture façade panels using manual welding if I have 50*a + 50*b + 25*c or would it be cheaper to have 120*a + 3*b + 2*c?
Or discussing the visual aspects of various types of geometry. Do Bezier or Akima splines look more natural? What about them makes them look natural/unnatural? Can people tell the difference between a perfect circle and a circularish Nurbs curve with 12 points? Does it matter whether the Nurbs curve is small or big? Next to a perfect circle or not? Horizontal or vertical?
What equation would better describe experienced time by humans travelling from A to B rather than measured time?
How can I find out under what wind conditions this sharp edge on my building will start whistling?
How much might the potentially bad smell of this cheaper material lower the value of my building?…
ed according to list C.
I tried replace members, but it consists of geometry, so it doesn't worked.
In list C I filtered all the indices that need to be replaced.
All items in {0;0} from C need to be replaced by List B {0;0}
All items in {0;1} from C need to be replaced by List B {0;1}
And so on...
In the end everything needs to be fed into a orient component.
G is the geometry behind list B
A is the new list (but I don't know how to create)
B is the list A of all 60 panels
To wrap up the question:
I need to have entry 1 from list B in a new list on position: 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 10 11 12 15 16 21
I need to have entry 2 from list B in the same new list on position: 4 8 9 13 14 etc. etc. etc.
I wonder how I can do this :) Thanks in advance!
…
ld work.
For example there's a grid shell and I've got a number of control points (for example 3) that can move up and down.
Depending on the control points I get forms that are structurally good and some that are bad.
In my office we've got a GH-Component, which leads the geometry in structural members and solves the structural forces and so on through an external Software called Sofistik and afterwards gives back to GH some Values, for example maximum bending moments. (Like Karamba)
Now I want to create this optimization component or something like that to minimize e.g. the bending moments in the given geometry.
Let's start with the work of the component.
So when I've three control points that can only move in z-direction.
P1(0,0,Z1), P2(10,0,Z2), P3(5,5,Z3)
They only depend on Z, so everything depends on Z1 to Z3 which have a range between 0 and 10 f.e.
First I want to get some (between 9 and 15) random Particles, one particle consists of this 3 different Z's.
So for example the first particle Part1 is [Z1=10, Z2=5, Z3=7]
and the second particle Part2 is [Z1=7, Z2=1, Z3=9]
and so on.
I created these Start Particles in a Cluster. See attached file.
I also tried this in C#, but thought it is easier in GH.
After I've got the Start Particles I want to give out the first particle and evaluate with its including Z's the target value in GH. Therefore I had to take the first branch and graft this branch (Discussion before)
Afterwards I want to save this Target Value that depends on the first starting Particle. Then I want to give out the second starting Particle to evaluate its target Value and store it. And so on till the last target Value of the last Starting Particle got assigned.
Then I want to assign the particles with its target values. E.g. part1: t=0.9, part2: t=1.8...
Then I want to define neighborhoods or the count of the expected local minima.
These neighborhoods can look like: Each neighborhood has to include not less than 3 particles. And the particles have to be next to each other.
E.g. if there are 12 particles and I want to have a look for 3 local minima, I need 3 or 4 neighborhoods. Then I would take 3 neighborhoods, because the more particles in one neighborhood, the better.
So the Count of the neighborhoods would be N=min{(Count of Part/3)& N_min}
How to define these neighborhoods I don't know at the moment. I think it has to be searched for the distance between the particles. E.g. part1 with (9,9,9) and part2 with (9,9,8) are next to each other but part 3 with(1,1,2) is far away.
Then each StartParticle is set to Partx_localbest.
And in each Neighbourhood the best of these localbeststs is Part_NyBest. (The best ist the one with the smallest target Value)
Loop:
Now I want to create new Particles. These Particles don't change their Z-values randomly. They change their Z-Values depending on Part_NxBest and Part_localBest. Therefore it has to be evaluated a new velocityfactor with v_Partx_new=0,792*v_PartxOld+1,5*random(0,1)*(partx_localbest-partx)+1,5*random(0,1)*(part_NyBest-partx)
The new particles will then be partx_new=partx+v_Partx_new.
The new Particle partx_new will be set to partx and then set in the output.
then there has to be caught the targetValue of part1 afterwards part2 can be put out and its target value caught and so on.
Then it has to be looked for the Partx_localbest through comparing the partx_localbest and its target value with the new part_x and its target value. If the target value of the new partx is smaller than partx_localbest,
then partx_localbest is the new partx.
This has to be done for each partx. Afterwards the same for neighborhoods best (best of all partx_localbest in one neighborhood)
Endloop if velocity gets small.
Output all part_NxBest
Output all targetvalues of the part_NxBests.
So in the Input there have to be:
StartParticles if they are given through the cluster attached.
Device on the target Value like in the attached gh.file from David Rutten I found in the discussions
Count of neighborhoods
And in the output
Output particle for evaluation
Output all part_NxBest
Output all targetvalues of the part_NxBests
Hope didn’t forget anything. And hope it isn’t crushed to badly. Sorry for my bad English by the way ;-)
For more explanation, how the PSO works in other programs. There’s attached a workflow script (is it called like that?) I think for GH it should be a little bit changed like I tried in my explanations.
So if you can help me a in some parts or you have any advices would be great, otherwise thank you nevertheless!!!!
Thankfully there’s no limit for the words in the discussions :-D
Best, Heiko
…
ed four workshops, each featuring a partnership of a creator of hardware technology and a software developer. The outcomes of the four workshops will form a single structure.
Workshops:
1. Facade panels with RoboFold & Kangaroo/Lobster
2. Cantilever CNC wooden lattice with Archiwaste & SMART Form by BuroHappold
3. Corian freeform surfaces by Cutting Edge & Evolute Tools
4. Milled foam and cast concrete with Cordek & Galapagos/David Rutten
Book on the Shape To Fabrication website or via SimplyRhino on 0208 498 9900. Tickets are limited to 10 per workshop at £500+VAT (professional) and £400+VAT (student).…
Added by Gregory Epps at 5:15am on September 29, 2011
arm, controlled with a variety of sensory inputs. The project will be developed in Grasshopper and Firefly, using the Arduino microcontroller. No previous experience is required.
Workshop overview:
1 – Sensing and Actuating - Brief Introduction to Grasshopper - Brief Introduction to Arduino - Introduction to Firefly
2 – Arm simulation - Introduction to Vector Math in Grasshopper - Simulation of the multi-axis Arm
3 – Fabrication - Brief introduction to laser cutting - Laser cutting the arm components
4 – Motion Tracking to Actuation - Introduction to Motion tracking (Kinect, Leap Motion, iPhone) - Controlling the arm with various motion inputs
Please refer to this link for further information about the workshop series and registration specifics.
…