53 → 53 → 63 → 74 → 74 → 84 → 9
As you can see from the above list the connection sequence comes in waves of three, where each group of similar indices on the left is associated with a group of three incrementing indices on the right.
Some combination of Series components will probably generate this list, but it'll only work for the first ring, the second one will need a different connection pattern. It is perhaps better to just encode the integer pairs by hand. But then you cannot change your mind about the number of sides later.…
Added by David Rutten at 10:39am on October 21, 2015
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, etc
In addition to the components in the attached file, I have also tried using Cull Index but that did not do much. I tried using a number slider set to whole numbers with the range equal to the values I have set up in the integer, but it just increases the size by 1 every time. Any help on steps in the right direction would be great thanks.…
middle index, and choose that point with List Item. If even, for example 4 points (0, 1, 2, 3), you'll get 2, so subtract one and choose those two indices, 1 and 2. I only had a few minutes to play with this, so it isn't a fully-baked solution, but it should take you a little further.…
That is correct. In reality there are 3 major versions of .NET 1, 2, and 4 (different versions of mscorlib.dll)
Rhino 4 uses .NET 2 which includes 3 and 3.5.
Rhino 5 uses .NET 4