I found this definion created by Daniel Piker in the forum.
http://www.grasshopper3d.com/video/rheotomic-surface-flowline-relat...
The problem is, that when you define points, the rheotomic surface is created always in a boundary starting at (0,0).
How can I define the boundary/closed curve, in which the drawing of the rheotomic surfaces will take place?
Daniel Piker
Hi Lefteris,
It depends on how you want the surface to relate to the boundary.
If it should just be trimmed by it, then regular boolean operations should work.
(just extrude your boundary vertically and intersect it 'cookie-cutter' style)
However, if you want the equipotentials to actually follow the boundary then it is a rather more difficult but interesting problem. I think this would need the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation.
http://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/c2003/SchwarzChristoffelMod.html
Dec 6, 2012
Daniel Piker
also - on a side note - I was just looking at some nice images of nematic films and Schlieren textures
http://dept.kent.edu/spie/liquidcrystals/textures1.html
http://www.lci.kent.edu/polmicpic.html
which I think have some interesting links to rheotomic surfaces
(also singular opticsĀ http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-14-23-11402)
Dec 6, 2012