i can't figure out why with these GH settings (please check image) the loft surface generated in Rhino is splitted/divided unevenly in the V(X) -direction.
is it me, is it Rhino, GH or "only" my computer that is sooo wrong?
i'm just soo tired encountering these kinds of errors all the time.
"the progression of the domain of a surface is not linear (it might be compressed in some places and stretched in others, especially near the edges where the surface has to be clamped), the distance between isocurves is not guaranteed to be identical either."
In chapter 7 of the Primer you'll find extensive information about Nurbs curves and surfaces - be sure to take a look at it.
When you do, you will understand perfectly what is going on here:
Jacek Jaskólski
Well, it all depends on what you mean by "unevenly" ...
As David Rutten exaplains (here, p.78):
"the progression of the domain of a surface is not linear (it might be compressed in some places and stretched in others, especially near the edges where the surface has to be clamped), the distance between isocurves is not guaranteed to be identical either."
In chapter 7 of the Primer you'll find extensive information about Nurbs curves and surfaces - be sure to take a look at it.
When you do, you will understand perfectly what is going on here:
Good luck!
JJ
Sep 7, 2009
Jacek Jaskólski
It seems I've made a fool out of myself with all the off-subject smart talking :)
What you need to do is rebuild that surface directly in Rhino.
(select the surface, enter "Rebuild")
Sorry for all the commotion.
JJ
Sep 8, 2009
qiushi
still useful.
Jan 1, 2014