BUG: Relative Item

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on August 10, 2011 at 5:27am

Thanks. It's indeed broken. 

 

--

David Rutten

david@mcneel.com

Poprad, Slovakia

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on August 10, 2011 at 7:06am

I think I fixed it. But I had to completely rewrite the wrapping logic. If the data tree you're operating on is clean (i.e. only consecutive path indices) it should behave completely as expected. Once you start to have gaps in the tree, like so:

 

{0;0}

{0;1}

{0;4}

{0;5}

 

then it will behave differently now, though hopefully better.

 

--

David Rutten

david@mcneel.com

Poprad, Slovakia