BUGS with commands "Sweep 1, 2 rails", "Rail revolve" with closed curves.

Explain to me please, what is wrong with that?

Attachments:

Sweep 2 rails.gh, 5 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by RhinoBridges on November 25, 2011 at 10:31am

Hi,
Just for test Fl ipa curve A with a reference curve B.
Or maybe use loft compoment

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RhinoBridges on November 25, 2011 at 10:32am

Flip a curve A With référence curve B is à goog works

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TheChosenOne on November 25, 2011 at 4:49pm

No. In this easy example no one rearrangement variants and flip curves and lines do not produce results.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TheChosenOne on November 25, 2011 at 5:44pm

I understand that the loft in this example will work fine. But if the curve will be a different number of points, the loft can already give the wrong result, and then I will need a Sweep 2 rails.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TheChosenOne on November 25, 2011 at 5:11pm

Rail revolve

Attachments:

Rail revolve.gh, 2 KB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TheChosenOne on November 25, 2011 at 5:48pm

In this case, I can not understand what the problem is just do...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TheChosenOne on November 25, 2011 at 5:27pm

Really, only at me these commands, provided the use of closed curves as a rail, do not give results?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TheChosenOne on November 25, 2011 at 5:36pm

Sweep 1 rail

Attachments:

Sweep 1 rail.gh, 2 KB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TheChosenOne on November 25, 2011 at 5:56pm

Sweep 1 rail open rail

Attachments:

Sweep 1 rail open rail.gh, 9 KB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Mims on November 25, 2011 at 6:56pm

I once had the problem where I had to have the Curve Seam of the rail lined up with the profile curve. Doing this fixed the issue. Maybe that will work for you. It isn't always reliable though.