algorithmic modeling for Rhino

  • Female
  • Vic
  • Australia
Share on Facebook
  • Blog Posts
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Fb's Friends

  • Matteo Lo Prete
  • Paolo Cappelletto
  • punkhead

fb's Page

Profile Information

Company, School, or Organization
Uni Melb

Comment Wall (1 comment)

You need to be a member of Grasshopper to add comments!

Join Grasshopper

At 12:59pm on November 8, 2009, Matteo Lo Prete said…
Hi Morgan,
the receiver is connected with another piece of my definizion which defines how the component's arches open. It is a parameter, for me.
You can see this part here:

Well, the first receiver (top left) is connected with the list which contains the centroids of every triangle of my mesh (my canopy, that I turned into a series of triangular surfaces). In this part of the definition I evaluate the Z coordinates (extracted form the points).
I execute some operations in order to have my values from 0 to 1 (parametrization). Then I sutracted the lower value of the list to all the data. So I obtained a new list of numbers, which stay from 0 to 1 and I can use in order to determine a gradient in the arch openings.
The result? If you look carefully to the rendering I posted you'll see that the arches are less opened near the ground and more opened near the top. It's a structural way of design the canopy. The more loads you must support, the more closed your arches will be (and the more stronger you should be).

Anyway consider this part as not important, because this parameter is just a my interpretation, it's not essential in order to obtain the canopy I posted. If you want you can just substitute that emitter with a simple number, from 0 to 1. Don't know, try to put 0.4 as an imput and let's see what happens. The result will be more similar. ;-)

Nice to meet you Morgan.





  • Add Photos
  • View All


  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2022   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service