Andromeda

Comment

Comment by djordje on October 1, 2012 at 3:48pm

If I understood it correctly from the image preview and Emlplsn's replies, there are several attractor curves present. In that case, definition might look like this:

You might need to decrease the "S" input of the "SqGrid" component in order to get more rollers and therefor better final result. I can not do that, my PC is junk, even with this number of rollers it takes about 4,5 minutes to load.

Comment by Danny Andrés Osorio Gaviria on September 30, 2012 at 3:31pm

Awesome!!!... can we see the GH definition please!!! :O

Comment by djordje on September 30, 2012 at 2:43pm

Thank you emlplsn.
I guess the vortex curve itself is an attractor curve?
If I can see it correctly there are few vortex/attractor curves out there. Did you used the same definition just lowered the "c" parameter by 1 or 2, and in that way got those other few curves?

Comment by emlplsn on September 30, 2012 at 2:15pm

Only t is a variable with more than one value (vector). The rest of them are just constants.

Comment by djordje on September 30, 2012 at 1:15pm

Thank you for the reply.
But what range of numbers did you use for a,b,c,d,t ?
Can you post the definition screenshot? At least that part related to curve creation?

Comment by emlplsn on September 30, 2012 at 12:40pm

Thanks djordje. I generated the vortex geometry with the mathematical function-component by using the following parametric equation:

fx(t) = a*t^2*sin(b*t+c)+d;
fy(t) = a*t^2*cos(b*t+c)+d;

Nothing fancy at all. Cheers

Comment by djordje on September 30, 2012 at 12:03pm

Very interesting !!
What are those vortex patterns? A component, or?