than v4.9.6.1.
Do you have administrators rights on your PC? Or is that office PC?
1) Download Revo: https://www.revouninstaller.com/start-freeware-download, install it.2) Uninstall MapWinGIS with it.3) Download MapWinGIS from here: https://github.com/MapWindow/MapWinGIS/releases/download/v4.9.6.0/MapWinGIS-only-v4.9.6.1-x64.exe4) Once the MapWinGIS file is downloaded, right-click on it, and choose: 'Run as Administrator'. Complete the installation.Does that make any difference?…
Added by djordje to Gismo at 1:07pm on January 19, 2021
s than 40% on average.2. 8gb usage is steady at 28% 3. I've been now looking at 2 blank white screen, in both Rhino and Grasshopper for well over 20 min. finally I went for a walk at 10:25am, (its a beautiful day why waste it looking at nonexistent calculations, It would help if there was a timing function in the code that would let me know how long the calculations were going to take, came back 11:25am still no results. Had to Quit Rhino in the Start manager.
I have used all sorts of window programs for well over 25 years. Rhino and Grasshopper are the only 2 programs that I have ever seen that show totally white screens in their operating windows :(
…
etry between 2 definitions).
You can use the Panel to export for example txt-files, whitch would be the linking part between 2 definitions or PC's.
Then you just need to connect both PC's via a home network and then you can send the data in the txt-file between both (it's also auto-updating).
I also tried this some time ago.
Best,
Martin.…
eone would know how to group each data position from each branch ... meaning, for instance, that I have a list of data with 3 branches, each branch containing 28 data instances (see attached image). Now, how would I get the (0;0)+(1;0)+(2;0) to be grouped in a new branch, as well as (0;1)+(1;1)+(2;1) and so on?
Also, I need for the setup to able to take in variables, so that the 3 branches might change to 6, and the 28 data instances might to change to anything between 10 and 100.
Thanks in advance,
/Claus
…
m-found gridshell, make the lengths of families of elements equal (using the EqualLength component together with the Kangaroo2 solver).
I am experiencing 2 issues:
1) After the form-finding part, the number of elements in the gridshell (which are lines running from node to node) is multiplied by 4. The resulting shape is as expected, but for some reason all elements have been duplicated 3 times (in other words there are 4 coincident elements everywhere).
2) I have previously used the EqualLength component on the similar structures, with the difference that they were existing structures modelled in Rhino (similar to the Baked output of the form-finding process described in step 1)).
In my previous experiences the Kangaroo2 solver converged impressively quickly, but now it appears a lot slower.
I am wondering whether this is related to both the Kangaroo and Kangaroo2 solvers running simultaneously (although the form-finding part only lasts for a few seconds, which I would have thought means the Kangaroo solver has finished running after that time so all my PC's ressource can be dedicated to the Kangaroo2 solver).
Does anyone have an explanation (and a remedy) for the above issues?…
at your original list of numbers, if I am to go through and check manually to see what I should be getting out, I think you should only get a few outputs (which is why I was confused by all the outputs at the end of the definition.
For example, just as an example I started with X1 as 279 (item index 11). When I did the math, the only indexes that I got were 15,28, and 33.
This is because:
since 279 is positive, look for next number that is at least 180 less or 360 more than X1.
the value of 78 (item index 15) is the first value to satisfy this requirement.
Then, since 78 is smaller than 279, we are looking for the next value at least 180 more or 360 less than 78.
The value 272 (item index 28) is that next value.
Then since 272 is larger than 78, we are looking for the next value at least 180 less or 360 more than 272.
The value 52 (item index 33) is the next value.
So the definition should output the following:
indexes 15, 28, 33.
Does that make sense?…
Added by Brian Harms at 4:20pm on December 10, 2011
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, etc
In addition to the components in the attached file, I have also tried using Cull Index but that did not do much. I tried using a number slider set to whole numbers with the range equal to the values I have set up in the integer, but it just increases the size by 1 every time. Any help on steps in the right direction would be great thanks.…