ky.exe did not accept -p parameter and made empty sky.cal file.
----
Edit: solved run problem, Bee did not download OpenStudioMasterTemplate.idf
Get it here: https://github.com/mostaphaRoudsari/Honeybee/issues/119
Now get empty HDR:
C:\ladybug\prox\imageBasedSimulation>rpict -i -t 10 -vtv -vp 245.129 -226.458 20 0.405 -vd -0.549 0.656 -0.518 -vu -0.332 0.397 0.855 -vh 42.862 -vv 26.991 -v l 0 -vs 0 -vl 0 -x 800 -y 600 -af prox_RAD_Perspective.amb -ps 8 -pt 0.15 -pj 0.6 -dj 0 -ds 0.5 -dt 0.5 -dc 0.25 -dr 0 -dp 64 -st 0.85 -ab 2 -ad 1024 -as 175 -ar 150 -aa 0.200 -lr 4 -lw 0.050 -av 0 0 0 prox_RAD.oct 1>prox_RAD_Perspectiv e.unf rpict: 0 rays, 0.00% after 0.0000 hours rpict: skybright`c__ladybug_skylib_cumulativeSkies_SINGAPORE_SGP_SINGAPORE_SGP_1 : undefined variable rpict: 1020 rays, 4.91% after 0.0000 hours
----
Hi friends,
trying to get a cumulative sky image metric to run and encountered an issue with the image-based metrics component. It throws:
Runtime error (KeyNotFoundException): honeybee_materialLib Traceback: line 768, in main, "<string>" line 1442, in script
I guess this is some sort of setup issue on my end, or I messed up the definition? Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Max
…
but the order in which K gets changed is the same order that all of the other lists get changed.
For example (I'm not at a PC with Rhino/GH so I can't post an example directly) You want to order a cloud of points from the bottom up, i.e. by Z lowest to highest. Using the PComp component to decompose a point into its separate x, Y and Z components you can plug the Z output into K of the Sort Component. Sort will then re-order the Z values from lowest to highest, but the points you wish to order haven't be changed only a list of numbers. So you can plug the points into A and they will be reordered into the same lowest to highest order that the Z component was changed to.
Similarly if each of these points had a label that you wished to be attached to it at a latter point in the definition the list would no longer be in the same sequence. For instance if the original list was ordered in the X axis from 1 to 20 with one being the closest point to X = 0 and 20 being the furthest. Since you have rearranged the points, their labels are now 1 is the lowest and 20 is the highest, but we want them to remain the same as before with 1 being the closest to X=0. This is where the extra inputs on the Sort Component come in. Plug the list into B.
K is ordered smallest number to largest number
A is ordered lowest point to highest point
B is ordered so that 1 remains closest point to X=0 and 20 is furthest from X=0 …
ted_With_Honeybee.gh" file:
Warnings:
1. Honeybee cannot find RADIANCE folder on your system.
Make sure you have RADIANCE installed on your system.
You won't be able to run daylighting studies without RADIANCE.
A good place to install RADIANCE is c:\radiance
2. Honeybee cannot find EnergyPlusV7-2-0 folder on your system.
Make sure you have EnergyPlusV7-2-0 installed on your system.
You won't be able to run energy simulations without EnergyPlus.
A good place to install EnergyPlus is c:\EnergyPlusV7-2-0
Error:
1. Solution exception:Could not find a part of the path 'c:\ladybug\HoneybeeRadMaterials.mat'.
---------------------
I now reinstalled Radiance in the C:\Radiance folder and when dropping the Honeybee_Honeybee component on the canvas, I get the following:
Runtime error (DirectoryNotFoundException): Could not find a part of the path 'c:\ladybug\HoneybeeRadMaterials.mat'.Traceback: line 253, in __init__, "<string>" line 2200, in script
----------------------
[that is also the only error that I'm now getting when opening the 000 getting started file).
There is no c:\ladybug on my PC.
Note: In order to run the Radiance installer, I had to run as administrator. My user doesn't have write rights on the c-root folder (and no chance of getting that either... :)
Thanks,
wim
…
the esphere.
not complex to understand seeing only!.
https://youtu.be/fEHPwkfTFS0
Create the grid....create a shape for this stairs/group this stairs in one shape.
”panelling tools/....panels custom 2D”
apply the shape to the surface.(but before make a “grid”with the shape/grid/
“Create grid/surface domain number/....).
(i see that the surface is not so clean,with differents curvature parts,
so to have a good result,think i,need to pay attention to the curvatures,
reform, or make the panellings tools part by part).
i am not in my pc to do that today with Rhino,sorry.
a)
first you need to do a form with the stairs form, maybe group these lines.
each line is other form by now.
b)
(panelling tools, first make the grid.... after that apply the 2D pattern to the shape,
and control the scale and angle ,part by part maybe?.
c) maybe you can apply the form to the surface with
Flow allong surface?(there are differents possibilities, not only one to do that).
you need to try one.
Greetings…
ot give any changes in which Grasshopper matches data. Is the reason for this because I am trying to match points with different number of branches? Take a look:
[img]http://imageshack.us/f/706/datamatching.jpg[/img] First list of points has following branches - A: {0;0;0;0;0;0;0} {0;0;0;0;0;1;0} {0;0;0;0;0;2;0} {0;0;0;0;0;3;0} and second list of points B: {0;0;0;0;0;0} {0;0;0;0;0;1} {0;0;0;0;0;2} What I want is to remove that last branch in list A: {0;0;0;0;0;3;0} I though I will succeed to do that, by using the Shortest list alhorythm, but as I said, nothing changes, when I switch from Longest list algorithm to Shortest list algorithm. Is the problem in different level of branches - A list has 6 subranches, and list B has 5? How can I solve this? Thank you for the help. P.S. I am apologizing for not being able to attach the files, and images. Something is wrong with my PC.…
ng on the screen isn't rendered to a third of the size it should be, Windows has a scaling function under display settings, which I currently have set at 200%. For most programs, this works well, but in Grasshopper, this is what I get...
Remember that this is not a big screen! Only a small laptop...
What seems to be happening is that fonts are scaling up correctly. However, everything else is remaining at 96ppi, meaning all of the menus and buttons are tiny! Also, because the fonts are scaling up, the fonts now look enormous relative to the components.
This is rather irritating, as at a normal viewing distance things like the icons are almost indistinguishable.
Normally, I would accept that I was the one being weird as I had bought a laptop with high resolution, but shopping in PC World, it seems most mid- and high-end laptops now have high resolution screens. I'm aware that there is no quick fix for this, likely needing a substantial rewrite of the interface, but given current development for GH2, this might be something to bear in mind if it's not too late...…
Added by James Ramsden at 11:01am on February 5, 2016
&fork=hydra_2&id=Vector-BasedShadow_Study&slide=1&scale=1&offset=0,0 )
It worked fine with basic geometries. But when I put my projects geometry in the input it was loading for ages and I had to stop it.
Than I reduced my geometry and picked up some elements from it. Curved nurbs surfaces. I have drawn it in Rhino ( _networksrf)
With the reduced geometry I got some output after a long time (although I have a fast PC) but it wasn´t well. The shadows vectors were fragmentary ( attached file)
Is the code incomplete for geometries like mine? Or is it the wrong approach for those curved surfaces? Is there any better code for my aim?Thx for your help
Leo…
Added by Leonard Kern at 9:49am on October 12, 2016