e possible to change the component definition making possible to customize the number of outputs.Now Dispatch moves "true" values to A and "False" values to B
INPUT:
L (List to work on) -> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
D (Dispatch Pattern) -> True, False
OUTPUT:
A (List) -> 1, 3, 5, 7
B (List) -> 2, 4, 6, 8
Could it be possible/useful to modify it so it could dispatch items to several outputs, like:
INPUT:
L (List to work on) -> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0
D (Dispatch Pattern) -> A, B, C
OUTPUT:
A (List) -> 1, 4, 7, 0
B (List) -> 2, 5, 8
C (List) -> 3, 6, 9
maybe I'm missing something and there's already a component with this function... I have been searching on the forum for half afternoon, but can't find anything about it!
Thank you!…
ll these 12500 points.
Group 1 would represent the point located at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 etc.
Group 2 - 1, 6, 11, 16, 21 etc.
Group 3 - 2, 7, 12, 17, 22 etc.
Group 4 - 3, 8, 13, 18, 23 etc.
Group 5 - 4, 9, 14, 19, 24 etc.
I can create the pattern but the selection of points are all the points in row 0 and then all the points in row 5 and so on.
I would like the selection of points to start at the bottom left, and sequentially continue to the right and then continue on the 2nd row (left to right & bottom to top). i am hoping the pattern i am trying to achieve is more understood with the quick screen capture I uploaded.
the end goal is to be able to select all the points in the grid that are in each pattern.
Thanks in advance for any guidance with this. …
Added by Alyne Rankin at 6:53am on October 11, 2017
I have this :
list 3 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
list 2 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
list 1 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
list 0 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
and I want to group the points of index 0 in a branch, the points of index 1 in another branch and so on.
I attached a file in which I generated the points.
Thank you in advance for your help !
Regards
Red…
element connectivities in text, when matched with the corresponding coordinates of the nodes from dupPt, it makes all the polygons again (Green lines in the picture below), exactly as the original.
So Im thinking its like reconstructing everything again from the original shape with new relation between coordinates and element connectivities.
So in this case, eg: 0 1 2 3 4 5 makes the hexagon, 21 20 0 5 to makes the trapz.
Well here it misses the '0' in the end to close the hexagon here, the same with trapz. However the 'string join' and cset somehow close it to 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 to makes the hexagon, and 21 20 0 5 21 for trapz.
Im very glad now.
…
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, etc
In addition to the components in the attached file, I have also tried using Cull Index but that did not do much. I tried using a number slider set to whole numbers with the range equal to the values I have set up in the integer, but it just increases the size by 1 every time. Any help on steps in the right direction would be great thanks.…