)
Problem was caused due to matching data issue.
I would strongly advice you to read these two books (1,2) about Grasshopper:
They will clear you a lot of things about grasshopper, especially the basic ones.
About your problem with text: Text marks can be rotated by clicking and holding the left mouse button on it's ends. If you would like to move it without rotating, just click and hold at the middle of the text, and then move it.About color of the group: Right click on the desired group and define the RGB components under the "Colour".
Btw, I could not open your .3dm file as I am using Rhino 4, and you Rhino 5. But it's not important as I needed only two lines.Bear in mind that you can always save your Rhino 5 .3dm files as Rhino 4 (File->Save as-> Rhino 4 3DM Models).…
oop is achieved. After initially lofting the components (see "open loft" pic) I then proceeded to change the Loft option to "Closed" (see "MU Loft Closed" pic). The result was the 20th surface being inconsistently joined to the lst rib - as depicted with the green lines.
The desired result [as indicated with yellow lines] is to have the closed lofting between the 1st and last rib be consistent with the contours of the previous 19.
I've unsuccessfully tried a way to disassociate the relationship of the "green" lofting points to allow the lofting surface connection to the desired "yellow" points - with no success.
Any help in solving my riddle is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Greg
…
might only need one (like simulate for solar panel), the results then became quite redundant.
But I think I should try 360 degrees instead of 180, that should work.
-Q…
at your original list of numbers, if I am to go through and check manually to see what I should be getting out, I think you should only get a few outputs (which is why I was confused by all the outputs at the end of the definition.
For example, just as an example I started with X1 as 279 (item index 11). When I did the math, the only indexes that I got were 15,28, and 33.
This is because:
since 279 is positive, look for next number that is at least 180 less or 360 more than X1.
the value of 78 (item index 15) is the first value to satisfy this requirement.
Then, since 78 is smaller than 279, we are looking for the next value at least 180 more or 360 less than 78.
The value 272 (item index 28) is that next value.
Then since 272 is larger than 78, we are looking for the next value at least 180 less or 360 more than 272.
The value 52 (item index 33) is the next value.
So the definition should output the following:
indexes 15, 28, 33.
Does that make sense?…
Added by Brian Harms at 4:20pm on December 10, 2011
lconcepts in parametric design and exercises using Rhino, Grasshopper, andPython. Each of the 3 workshops corresponds to learning different software skillsthe softwares and applying those skills to a creative design challenge.…